Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byWilla Carson Modified over 6 years ago
1
IEEE 802.1 OmniRAN TG December 12th, 2017 Conference Call
Max Riegel, Nokia Bell Labs (TG Chair)
2
Conference Call Tuesday, December 12th , 2017 at 09:30-11:00am ET
September 2012 doc.: IEEE /0996r3 Conference Call Tuesday, December 12th , 2017 at 09:30-11:00am ET Join WebEx meeting Meeting number: Meeting password: OmniRAN Join by phone US Dallas UK London , China Beijing Access code: Global call-in numbers Stephen McCann, RIM
3
Agenda proposal Review of minutes Reports
September 2012 doc.: IEEE /0996r3 Agenda proposal Review of minutes Reports Editorial review results of P802.1CF-D0.7 Corrections going into P802.1CF-D1.0 for WG ballot WG ballot plan Agenda proposal and plan for January interim in Geneva, CH AOB Next meeting Stephen McCann, RIM
4
Participants, Patents, and Duty to Inform
All participants in this meeting have certain obligations under the IEEE-SA Patent Policy. Participants [Note: Quoted text excerpted from IEEE-SA Standards Board Bylaws subclause 6.2]: “Shall inform the IEEE (or cause the IEEE to be informed)” of the identity of each “holder of any potential Essential Patent Claims of which they are personally aware” if the claims are owned or controlled by the participant or the entity the participant is from, employed by, or otherwise represents “Should inform the IEEE (or cause the IEEE to be informed)” of the identity of “any other holders of potential Essential Patent Claims” (that is, third parties that are not affiliated with the participant, with the participant’s employer, or with anyone else that the participant is from or otherwise represents) The above does not apply if the patent claim is already the subject of an Accepted Letter of Assurance that applies to the proposed standard(s) under consideration by this group Early identification of holders of potential Essential Patent Claims is strongly encouraged No duty to perform a patent search
5
Patent Related Links All participants should be familiar with their obligations under the IEEE-SA Policies & Procedures for standards development. Patent Policy is stated in these sources: IEEE-SA Standards Boards Bylaws IEEE-SA Standards Board Operations Manual Material about the patent policy is available at If you have questions, contact the IEEE-SA Standards Board Patent Committee Administrator at or visit This slide set is available at
6
Call for Potentially Essential Patents
If anyone in this meeting is personally aware of the holder of any patent claims that are potentially essential to implementation of the proposed standard(s) under consideration by this group and that are not already the subject of an Accepted Letter of Assurance: Either speak up now or Provide the chair of this group with the identity of the holder(s) of any and all such claims as soon as possible or Cause an LOA to be submitted
7
Participation in IEEE 802 Meetings
Dorothy Stanley, HP Enterprise November 2016 doc.: ec EC Participation in IEEE 802 Meetings All participation in IEEE 802 Working Group meetings is on an individual basis Participants in the IEEE standards development individual process shall act based on their qualifications and experience. ( section 5.2.1) IEEE 802 Working Group membership is by individual; “Working Group members shall participate in the consensus process in a manner consistent with their professional expert opinion as individuals, and not as organizational representatives”. ( section 4.2.1) You have an obligation to act and vote as an individual and not under the direction of any other individual or group. Your obligation to act and vote as an individual applies in all cases, regardless of any external commitments, agreements, contracts, or orders. You shall not direct the actions or votes of any other member of an IEEE 802 Working Group or retaliate against any other member for their actions or votes within IEEE 802 Working Group meetings, see section and section 3.4.1, list item x By participating in IEEE 802 meetings, you accept these requirements. If you do not agree to these policies then you shall not participate.
8
Other Guidelines for IEEE WG Meetings
All IEEE-SA standards meetings shall be conducted in compliance with all applicable laws, including antitrust and competition laws. Don’t discuss the interpretation, validity, or essentiality of patents/patent claims. Don’t discuss specific license rates, terms, or conditions. Relative costs, including licensing costs of essential patent claims, of different technical approaches may be discussed in standards development meetings. Technical considerations remain primary focus Don’t discuss or engage in the fixing of product prices, allocation of customers, or division of sales markets. Don’t discuss the status or substance of ongoing or threatened litigation. Don’t be silent if inappropriate topics are discussed … do formally object. See IEEE-SA Standards Board Operations Manual, clause and “Promoting Competition and Innovation: What You Need to Know about the IEEE Standards Association's Antitrust and Competition Policy” for more details.
9
Resources – URLs Link to IEEE Disclosure of Affiliation
September 2012 doc.: IEEE /0996r3 Resources – URLs Link to IEEE Disclosure of Affiliation Links to IEEE Antitrust Guidelines Link to IEEE Code of Ethics Link to IEEE Patent Policy Clint Chaplin, Chair (Samsung)
10
Business#1 Call Meeting to Order Minutes taker: Roll Call
Meeting called to order by chair at 09:30 AM ET Minutes taker: Hao is taking notes Roll Call Name Affiliation Max Riegel Nokia Walter Pienciak IEEE Wang Hao Fujitsu
11
Call for Potentially Essential Patents
If anyone in this meeting is personally aware of the holder of any patent claims that are potentially essential to implementation of the proposed standard(s) under consideration by this group and that are not already the subject of an Accepted Letter of Assurance: Either speak up now or Provide the chair of this group with the identity of the holder(s) of any and all such claims as soon as possible or Cause an LOA to be submitted Nothing brought up.
12
Agenda Review of minutes Reports
September 2012 doc.: IEEE /0996r3 Agenda Review of minutes Postponed to January F2F meeting Reports .. Editorial review results of P802.1CF-D0.7 Included into this slideset on slide 14 and 15 Corrections going into P802.1CF-D1.0 for WG ballot Conclusion on editorial review 6 contributions to correct specific attributes subsections WG ballot plan Agenda proposal and plan for January interim in Geneva, CH AOB Next meeting Stephen McCann, RIM
13
Business #2 Review of minutes Reports
Review postponed for the upcoming F2F meeting Reports Walter briefly reported about the IEEE SA awards ceremony in Piscataway, where received an award for ‘emerging technology’. Editorial review results of P802.1CF-D0.7 Editorial review comments listed on the following 2 slides. Shortly introduced the comments to the editor with going through the list and pointing to the demanded modifications in the document. Implementation will be performed off-line through the editor.
14
Editorial review comments #1
L463: replace chapter 4.2 by text given in L1152: insert text as highlighted in L1496: insert text as highlighted in L2254: should be itemized and indented; ‘TT traffic’ is a further item aside of BE traffic and RC traffic L2297: figure 39 is not displayed properly. L2299: The text ‘Streams …’ is a continuation of the text above the figure and requires indentation as the text flow above the figure. If challenging, the figure 39 could be moved to the end of the text. L2368: should be ‘and guides fault diagnosis and maintenance’ L2392: Figure title should be kept on same page as figure. L2447: ‘E.g.’ belongs to the begin of the line L2460: ‘E.g.’ belongs to the begin of the line L2663: Text belongs to the indented text of ‘fully centralized TSN configuration model’ above and should be copied directly into line L2681: ‘ID’ changed to ‘ServiceFlow-ID’ L2682: there is one new paragraph from DCN , as follows, missing between L2681 and L2682. ”For time sensitive networking, service flows are denoted as ‘Streams’ starting at a ‘Talker’ and ending at a ‘Listener’. Talker and listener are end stations in the notation of IEEE 802 networking and are represented by Terminal and Access Router in this specification.”
15
Editorial review comments #2
L2738: should be ‘QoS policy control should allow for both intserv, and diffserv as well as TSN QoS models.’ L2758: should be ‘Usage limits (time, volume, delay)’ L2781: the texts in chapter is not up-to-date. (although figure 54 is good) Refer to DCN for inclusion the revisions. L2800: the texts in chapter is not up-to-date. L2812: part of Figure 55 is not displayed. L2841: figure 57 is not shown in complete. L2854: figure 58 is not shown in complete. So is figure 59. L2864: ‘This section’ should be ‘The following section’ L3250: left part of figure 63 should be deleted. (keep the right part only) L3508: Insert the introductory text for ‘8. Network softwarization functions’ as given by L3512: change ‘in sharing’ through ‘to provide’ L3539: Figure 70 is cropped to its left side. Reduce size of picture to make it fully appearing on the page. L3548: figure 72 is wrong, the correct one is the figure 8-4 in DCN L3569: Figure 77 is outdated; please insert instead figure 8-9 of L3570: chapter is not included: Refer to DCN for more details. L3610: ‘Figure 74’ should reference to ‘Figure 78’ above. L4344: Remove line; no PICS proforma in this document as explained in 5. Conformence L4345: Remove Annex A, as there is no annex
16
Business #3 Corrections going into P802.1CF-D1.0 for WG ballot
Walter will send out draft for review to Hao and Max before uploading the document to the private filespace. Hao and Max will respond to Walter through with final hints for editorial clean-up, if necessary. Corrections of the specific attributes sub-sections in chapter 7.2 – 7.7 Agreed to be included into D1.0 by Walter.
17
Business #4 WG ballot plan
Latest next Monday, if possible end of this week, to provide sufficient time for reviewers and make WG members aware who are leaving early for holidays. Agenda proposal and plan for January interim in Geneva, CH See next two slides Chair explained that OmniRAN session on Thursday depends on DCB demand for early start. Agenda proposal agreed. No amendments brought up. AOB Next meeting January 2018, F2F meeting at ITU site in Geneva FYI: IEEE 802 dress-code applies for the meeting. Adjourned by chair at 10:50 AM ET
18
January 2018 Agenda Graphics
Mon 1/22 Tue 1/23 Wed 1/24 Thu 1/25 Fri 1/26 09:00 10:30 OmniRAN opening 11:00 12:30 OmniRAN closing 14:00 15:30 16:00 17:30 18:15 19:15 All editors’ web meeting New Editors training
19
Agenda proposal for Jan 2018 F2F
Review of minutes Reports Result of P802.1CF WG ballot Comment resolution on P802.1CF-D1.0 New content for P802.1CF Plan for 802.1CF-D2.0 draft IC NEND contributions review Conference calls until Mar 2018 F2F Status report to IEEE 802 WGs Next meeting AOB
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.