Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
1
The First Amendment On Campus
Ian Bartrum, Professor of Law January 5, 2018
2
Goals For Today Brief overview of recent events.
Some first principles. Free Speech Doctrine: General rules. Schools & Universities Closing Thoughts.
3
Recent First Amendment Events
NFL Anthem Protests:
4
Recent First Amendment Events
NFL Anthem Protests:
5
Recent First Amendment Events
NFL Anthem Protests:
6
Recent First Amendment Events
Charlottesville Protests:
7
Recent First Amendment Events
Charlottesville Protests:
8
Recent First Amendment Events
Charlottesville Protests:
9
Recent First Amendment Events
Berkeley Protests:
10
Recent First Amendment Events
Berkeley Protests:
11
Recent First Amendment Events
Berkeley Protests:
12
Some First Principles
13
Some First Principles Why Value Free Speech? For the speaker?
For the audience? For society? At what cost or danger? For community? For government?
14
Some First Principles Self-Governance: Alexander Meiklejohn
Value to speaker of political activism Value to audience of information. Value to community of engagement and participation.
15
Some First Principles Discovering Truth:
Oliver Wendell Holmes: “marketplace of ideas”; natural selection. Intellectual, artistic, scientific value to all stakeholders.
16
Some First Principles Advancing Autonomy
Primarily concerned with freedom of will, expression, fulfillment of the speaker. Also, however, education of audience.
17
Some First Principles Promoting Tolerance:
Primarily concerned with effect on audience of thickening skin. Forces community to confront all ideas.
18
Some First Principles Costs & Criticism
19
Some First Principles
20
Doctrine: General Rules
State Action: First Amendment applies only to actions that we can attribute to the government. Laws, regulations, executive orders, court decisions. Circumstances in which government and private actors are entangled.
21
Doctrine: General Rules
Content: Is restriction content-based? Viewpoint-based? Subject-matter based? Super strict scrutiny. Is restriction content-neutral? Time, place, or manner? “Secondary effects”? Intermediate scrutiny.
22
Doctrine: General Rules
Forum: Traditional Public Forum Designated Public Forum Limited Public Forum Non-public Forum
23
Doctrine: General Rules
Speaker: Individual Corporation Government
24
Doctrine: General Rules
Type of Speech: Political General Symbolic Less protected: Incitement of illegal activity. Fighting words / Hate Speech Defamation
25
Doctrine: General Rules
Symbolic Speech / Conduct: Intended to convey a specific message. Likely to be understood. Regulation must target non-speech elements of conduct.
26
Doctrine: General Rules
Incitement: Clear and Present Danger Brandenburg Test: Intended and Likely to cause Imminent Lawless behavior Unprotected
27
Doctrine: General Rules
Fighting Words / Hate Speech: Words whose very utterance tend incite violence or inflict harm. Modern hate speech: “Intent to intimidate” must be element of crime. Unprotected.
28
Doctrine: General Rules
Defamation: Public or private figure? Plaintiff Burden of Proof Mens Rea: Compensatory Mens Rea: Punitive Public Official Clear and Convincing Evidence Actual Malice Public Figure Clear and Convincing Evidence Private Figure/ Matter of Public Concern Preponderance of the Evidence Negligence Private Figure/ Matter of Private Concern
29
Doctrine: General Rules
Permits / Licenses: Content-neutral: Time, place, or manner. Important government purpose. Clear criteria / no discretion Provide for judicial review.
30
Doctrine: Schools & Universities
Early Cases: Barnette, Tinker, Papish: Court clearly extends First Amendment protections to students. Not as clear about faculty, but strong sense of academic freedom supports applying constitutional principles.
31
Doctrine: Schools & Universities
Modern Recent Cases: More deference to administrators: Fraser: Punishment for lewd speech. Hazelwood: Censor articles on student pregnancy (students w/ faculty advisor). Morse: Can punish “Bong Hits 4 Jesus”
32
Doctrine: Schools & Universities
Freedom of Association: Schools can place some conditions on receipt of funding or support. Roberts v. Jaycees: Still subject to anti-discrimination law. But note: Boy Scouts v. Dale: Permits discrimination against homosexuals. CLS v. Martinez: University can require a “take all comers” membership policy.
33
Closing Thoughts “In those wretched countries where a man cannot call his tongue his own, he can scarce call anything his own. Whoever would overthrow the liberty of a nation must begin by subduing the freeness of speech.” — Benjamin Franklin
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.