1. Planning the Audit Engagement: key ingredients
Manfred van Kesteren
Tashkent, October 2017

2. Planning the audit engagement
Planning is part of internal auditing’s systematic, disciplined, and risk-based approach and is mandated by the International Standards for the Professional Practice of Internal Auditing (ISPPF);
Planning internal audit engagements involves considering the strategies and objectives of the area or process under review, prioritizing the risks relevant to the engagement, determining the engagement objectives and scope, and documenting the approach
Tashkent, October 2017

3. Relevant International Standards (mandatory)
2200 – Engagement Planning
Internal auditors must develop and document a plan for each engagement, including the engagement’s objectives, scope, timing, and resource allocations. The plan must consider the organization’s strategies, objectives, and risks relevant to the engagement;
2201 – Planning Considerations
In planning the engagement, internal auditors must consider:
The strategies and objectives of the activity being reviewed and the means by which the activity controls its performance. The significant risks to the activity’s objectives, resources, and operations and the means by which the potential impact of risk is kept to an acceptable level. The adequacy and effectiveness of the activity’s governance, risk management, and control processes compared to a relevant framework or model. The opportunities for making significant improvements to the activity’s governance, risk management, and control processes.
Tashkent, October 2017

4. Planning the audit engagement: the steps
Understand the context and purpose of the engagement;
Gather information to understand the area or process under review;
Conduct a preliminary assessment of relevant risks;
Form engagement objectives;
Establish engagement scope;
Allocate appropriate and sufficient resources;
Document the plan.
Tashkent, October 2017

5. Objectives for assurance and consulting engagements
The engagement objectives articulate what the engagement is specifically attempting to accomplish; therefore, the objectives should have a clear purpose, be concise, and be linked to the risk assessment (Standard 2210.A1);
Internal auditors should ensure that the objectives of the assurance engagement align with the business objectives of the area or process under review;
Internal auditors must also identify adequate criteria to evaluate the governance, risk management, and controls of the area or process under review and determine whether the business objectives and goals have been accomplished  Reference frameworks
Tashkent, October 2017

6. Scope for assurance and consulting engagements
The engagement scope sets the boundaries of the engagement and outlines what will be included in the review. Internal auditors must carefully consider the boundaries of the engagement to ensure that the scope will be sufficient to achieve the objectives of the engagement (Standard 2220 – Engagement Scope);
The scope may define such elements as the specific processes and/or areas, geographic locations, and time period (e.g., point in time, fiscal quarter, or calendar year) that will be covered by the engagement, given the available resources;
If the assurance engagement scope is limited in any manner or if access to necessary sources of information is restricted, internal auditors must disclose these situations to senior management and/or the board. Such situations would be considered impairments to internal audit independence (Standard 1130 – Impairment to Independence or Objectivity).
Tashkent, October 2017

7. Allocating appropriate and sufficient resources
After establishing the engagement objectives and scope, internal auditors must determine appropriate and sufficient resources to achieve the engagement objectives, as required by Standard 2230 – Engagement Resource Allocation;
appropriate refers to the mix of knowledge, skills, and other competencies needed to perform the engagement, and sufficient refers to the quantity of resources needed to accomplish the engagement with due professional care;
Timing/overall planning (stages of the audit) should also be considered.
Tashkent, October 2017

8. Documenting the engagement planning
During planning, internal auditors document information in engagement workpapers. This information becomes part of the engagement work program that must be established to achieve the engagement objectives, as required by Standard 2240 – Engagement Work Program;
The results of the preliminary risk assessment, the engagement objectives, and the engagement scope should be discussed with management of the area or process under review and key stakeholders across the organization;
Internal auditors may create an engagement planning memorandum (planning memo), to communicate the objectives, scope, and timing of the engagement.
Tashkent, October 2017