1. Alamo Colleges District
Performance Update
Dr. Tom Cleary, Vice Chancellor
Planning, Performance, and Information Systems Alamo Colleges District

4. Fall Headcount Enrollment College by Location (full term and flex 1)*
Z:\Projects\Student Profile\Fall 2017\Certified\Student Profile Fall 2017-Certified.xlsx
* By location

5. Student Profile Fall 2017
19% (11,954) Full-Time, 81% (49,461) Part-Time
57% (35,289) Female, 43% (26,126) Male
Ethnicity
62% (38,341) Hispanic
8% (4,961) African-American
24% (14,697) White
3% (1,616) Asian
3% (1,800) Other
53% Economically Disadvantaged for Fall 2016*; 20,895/(51,349-11,792 dual credit)
72% Receive Financial Aid for Fall 2016*; 28,456/(51,349-11,792 dual credit)
20% (12,494) Dual Credit Students
FT/PT, gender, ethnicity from Z:\Projects\Student Profile\Fall 2017\Certified\Student Profile Fall 2017-Certified.xlsx
*original document lists Asian separate from Other
Econ. dsadvtgd., fin. aid., and DC from Z:\Projects\Performance Updates\DATA\FY 2017 Financial Aid and Economically Disadvantaged Data.xlsx

6. Course Completion Rates
Z:\Projects\Grade Distribution\GradeDistributionwPrimaryFaculty\Reports\Fall 2017 Preliminary\Fall 2017 Preliminary Grade Distribution - Totals - Excluding Dual Credit.pdf
*Preliminary

7. Productive Grade Rates
Z:\Projects\Grade Distribution\GradeDistributionwPrimaryFaculty\Reports\Fall 2017 Preliminary\Fall 2017 Preliminary Grade Distribution - Totals - Excluding Dual Credit.pdf
*Preliminary

8. Number of High Risk Courses
Z:\IRES Users\BCaro\Student Profile\Performance Updates\AC High Risk Courses Fall forward
*Preliminary

9. CCSSE Results 2009 2011 2013 2015 2017 Student Engagement Domain
Active & Collaborative Learning
53.6
49.8
50.1
51.1
50.8
Student Effort
51.0
50.0
48.9
48.8
52.6
Academic Challenge
50.9
49.9
48.0
47.9
50.2
Student/Faculty Interaction
50.6
49.0
49.2
48.6
49.7
Support for Learners
51.5
51.4
53.5

10. CCSSE Results by College (2017)
Benchmark
SAC
SPC
PAC
NVC
NLC
Active & Collaborative Learning
47.5
48.1
49.4
57.7
52.2
Student Effort
51.7
52.1
55.8
54.2
47.9
Academic Challenge
50.3
48.8
51.6
50.4
50.2
Student/Faculty Interaction
47.3
48.3
53.0
51.8
48.0
Support for Learners
50.8
56.0
58.2
52.8
49.7

11. Percentage of students rating their entire educational experience as “good or excellent”?
Spring 2017 data

12. Would you recommend this college to a friend or family member?
Spring 2017 data

13. Fall-to-Fall FTIC Persistence Rates
12-13
13-14
14-15
15-16
16-17
FTIC
Persisted FT
3523
2212
3622
2235
3438
2265
2902
1967
3196
2241 PT
4713
2421
4176
2152
4389
2249
4714
2420
4351
2315
THECB Accountability System as of
2017 Cert KPI: CERTIFIED Measure 11-12: One-Year Fall to Fall Persistence

14. FT FTIC Comparative Persistence Rates
THECB
THECB Accountability System as of

15. Three-Year FTIC Graduation Rates
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
FTIC
Grads FT
4975
464
3963
563
3336
575
3289
655
3482
860 PT
5075
274
5528
393
4734
425
4185
389
4421
501
THECB Accountability System as of
Please note that colleges submit SSN changes to the THECB which the THECB then matches to its list from other colleges. FTIC cohort numbers change accordingly. As a result, cohort counts for the same cohort may be different at different timepoints.
2017 Cert KPI: Driver 3 CERTIFIED Measure 18: FTPT FTIC Graduates 3 years
In June 2017, the THECB issued a memo stating they had not included summer enrollees for their Fall 2012 cohort. Therefore, graduation rates were corrected in the Accountability System and in these data.
Source: THECB Accountability System (Rates from C03C-Graduation Rates and raw counts from Interactive); Rate=Total rate-Bachelor’s degree rate
THECB Accountability System

16. 3-Year FT FTIC Graduation Rates
THECB Accountability System as of

17. Four-Year FTIC Graduation Rates
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
FTIC
Grads FT
4779
592
4975
735
3963
798
3336
797
3661
938 PT
4252
380
5075
481
5528
689
4734
713
4185
686
THECB Accountability System as of
Please note that colleges submit SSN changes to the THECB which the THECB then matches to its list from other colleges. FTIC cohort numbers change accordingly. As a result, cohort counts for the same cohort may be different at different timepoints.
2017 Cert KPI: Driver 3  CERTIFIED Measure 19: FTPT FTIC Graduates 4 years
In June 2017, the THECB issued a memo stating they had not included summer enrollees for their Fall 2012 cohort. Therefore, graduation rates were corrected in the Accountability System and in these data.
Source: THECB Accountability System (Rates from C03C-Graduation Rates and raw counts from Interactive); Rate=Total rate-Bachelor’s degree rate
THECB Accountability System

18. 4-Year FT FTIC Graduation Rates
THECB Accountability System as of

19. Degrees Conferred

20. Degrees and Certificates Awarded
KPI 2017: Driver 3  CERTIFIED Measure 16: Degrees and Certificate Awards

21. Growth Rate in Degrees Conferred
One Year Growth Rate (FY16-FY17)
Three Year Growth Rate (FY14-FY17)
NLC
14%
271%
NVC
-11%
83%
PAC
67%
SAC
15%
90%
SPC
12%
49%
Alamo Colleges 6%
78%
AC: FY ; FY  (( )/12009)= 6.22%
 FY ; FY  (( )/7147)= 78.48%

22. Alamo College Degree Actuals and Targets

23. Transfer Rate (FTIC students)

24. Where Alamo Students Transfer
UTSA
Texas State University
University of the Incarnate Word
Texas A&M University
Texas A&M SA
UT-Austin
Fall 2006-Jan 2018

25. Success at Transfer Institutions F12 Transfers Graduating F13-F16
SAC
63.5%
NVC
61.6%
PAC
61.2%
NLC
60.0%
SPC
55.7%
Alamo
61.8%
Peer Group Avg.
60.5%
State Avg.
THECB report not updated as of

26. Students Employed and/or Enrolled within 6 Months of Graduation
Not updated as of

27. Fall 2014 FT FTIC 3-Year Tracking*
Updated as of ; grades are preliminary

28. Personal Assessment of the College Environment (PACE) Results

29. Four Climate Factors Factor 2014 2015 2016 2017 3.44 3.54 3.61 3.83
Institutional Structure
3.44
3.54
3.61
Supervisory Relationship
3.83
3.89
3.90
3.88
Teamwork
3.91
3.94
3.96
3.92
Student Focus
4.02
4.06
4.12
4.11

30. Funding for the Alamo Colleges

31. Bond Rating
Moody’s
AAA
S&P

32. Foundation Assets

33. 100%

34. SACSCOC
100%

35. 67%

36. CIP Bond Community Approval
67%

37. 2017 Highlights
NLC: ???
NVC:
PAC:
SPC:
SAC:

38. 2017 Highlights
NLC: Accredited
NVC:
PAC:
SPC:
SAC:

39. 2017 Highlights
NLC: Accredited
NVC: ???
PAC:
SPC:
SAC:

40. 2017 Highlights NLC: Accredited NVC: Best Community College in Texas
PAC:
SPC:
SAC:

41. 2017 Highlights NLC: Accredited NVC: Best Community College in Texas
PAC: ???
SPC:
SAC:

42. 2017 Highlights NLC: Accredited NVC: Best Community College in Texas
PAC: “Top 15” College in US in Teaching
SPC:
SAC:

43. 2017 Highlights NLC: Accredited NVC: Best Community College in Texas
PAC: “Top 15” College in US in Teaching
SPC: ???
SAC:

44. 2017 Highlights NLC: Accredited NVC: Best Community College in Texas
PAC: “Top 15” College in US in Teaching
SPC: Best Online School in Texas
SAC:

45. 2017 Highlights NLC: Accredited NVC: Best Community College in Texas
PAC: “Top 15” College in US in Teaching
SPC: Best Online School in Texas
SAC: ???

46. 2017 Highlights NLC: Accredited NVC: Best Community College in Texas
PAC: “Top 15” College in US in Teaching
SPC: Best Online School in Texas
SAC: Nationally Ranked as “Top 10” Best Community College for Hispanics

48. 2018 Priorities Student Success Agenda AlamoADVISE AlamoINSTITUTES
AlamoENROLL
AlamoCONFIDENCE
ACOL

51. Appendices

52. High Risk Courses* ASTR 1303 BIOL 1406 CHEM 1305, 1312, 1411, 1412
ITCC 1414
MATH 0100, 0105, 0320, 0410, 1314, 1324, 1332, 1414, 2412, 2413, 2414
*Preliminary

53. High Risk Courses*
SGNL 1301
SPAN 1300
*Preliminary

54. Degrees & Certificates Awarded by Ethnicity
Degrees and Certificates Awarded by Ethnicity-Duplicated
THECB Interactive Accountability System
Other = International + Other

55. Degrees & Certificates Awarded by Gender
Degrees and Certificates Awarded by Gender-Duplicated
THECB Interactive Accountability System
Other = International + Other