Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byDanielle Auger Modified over 6 years ago
1
Chicago’s Transition to an Integrated Planning Council
November 15, 2017 H.L. Anderson Peter McLoyd Sara Zamor CDPH Administrator Community Co-Chair Community Co-Chair Peter McLoyd Introduction of the Chicago EMA team
2
Chicago’s Transition to an Integrated Planning Council
Hana L. Anderson – Former Government Co-Chair / CDPH Peter McLoyd Slide 4
3
Chicago’s Transition to an Integrated Planning Council
Peter McLoyd – Community Co-Chair Peter McLoyd Slide 3
4
Chicago’s Transition to an Integrated Planning Council
Sara Zamor – Community Co-Chair Peter McLoyd Slide 5
5
Chicago’s Transition to an Integrated Planning Council
David Kern – Deputy Commissioner, CDPH Peter McLoyd Slide 6
6
Chicago Area HIV Integrated Services Council
Chicago’s Transition to an Integrated Planning Council Chicago Area HIV Integrated Services Council CAHISC Peter McLoyd The name of the integrated council CAHISC Slide 7
7
Presentation Overview
The Chicago EMA Prevention & Care Planning Activities Impetus for Integrated Planning Process for Integrated Planning Challenges Support & Endorsement Integration Work Group Selection Committee Tasks Peter McLoyd Slide 8
8
Presentation Overview
New Configuration Initial Phase – Year 1 Initial Phase – Year 2 (proposed) Final Configuration Committee Structures Resources Lessons Learned Moving Forward Peter McLoyd Slide 9
9
Chicago EMA Like other Eligible Metropolitan Areas
(EMAs), the Chicago EMA is comprised of urban, suburban and rural communities. The Chicago EMA consists of 9 counties. Of the EMA's residents, 94% live in urban areas, 2% live in suburban areas and 4% live in rural areas. 85% of PLWHA in Illinois live in the EMA. There are 33,856 people living with HIV and AIDS (PLWHA) in Illinois. Eighty five percent (28,741) reside in the EMA and 64.5% (21,844) reside in the city of Chicago. Peter McLoyd Slide 10
10
Prevention and Care Planning Activities in Chicago from 1999 - 2006
Consider value of joint Community Planning Increase understanding between Prevention / Care Create and implement a Strategic Plan Identify data to create collective outcomes Ensure the continuous involvement of all stakeholders Identify and evaluate best practices Prevention & Care Work Groups established Peter McLoyd Slide 11
11
Impetus for Integration
November 2009 Test Linkage to Care + Treatment (TLC Plus) (HPTN 065) (RM Granich, et al) December 2009 HHS Revised Treatment Guidelines March 2010 ACA signed into law July 2010 White House release National HIV/AIDS Strategy (NHAS) 2010 ECHPP /12 Cities Project February 2011 CROI - Can Lowering Community Viral Load Decrease New HIV Infections? March 2011 Gardner Cascade Aug. 2011 HPTN 052 (M. Cohen et al) June 2012 ACA and Supreme Court decision July 2012 CDC Revised HIV Planning Guidance Peter McLoyd Slide 12
12
Peter McLoyd Slide 13
13
Challenges Community Support Ryan White Part A / Prevention balance
How to Integrate Housing? Integrated Membership By-laws Synchronize Planning Cycles Prevention & Care Planning Guidance Respectful transition of current members Peter McLoyd Slide 14
14
Level of Support HIV Stakeholders: Planning Council, HPPG, and other partners Federal Partners (HRSA & CDC) Community Co-Chair Leadership CDPH Leadership: STI/HIV Division and staff commitment Peter McLoyd Slide 15
15
Endorsement H.L. Anderson Slide 16
16
Integration Work Group
Composition: Twelve CDPH Employees: Prevention, Care, Housing, and Public Information Fourteen Community Representatives: Leadership from PC and HPPG: 50% Consumers Tasks: Review Prevention and Care Models Create Integration Model Hand-off charge to Selection Committee H.L. Anderson Slide 17
17
Selection Committee Tasks
Review Ryan White Primer Review CDC Prevention Planning Guidance Develop Scoring Criteria Review and Score Candidate Applications Identify candidates slated for interviews Present slate for review and vetting by CDPH Present final slate to Steering Committee H.L. Anderson Slide 18
18
Initial Phase – Year 1 May 2011: Integration Workgroup
Membership recruitment put on hold recognizing imminent changes Dec 2011: Interim Bylaws, call for applications and new name – CAHISC Jan 2012: Selection Committee: New Applications Feb 2012: Joint Meeting – the Council and HPPG The Chicago Area HIV Services Council and the HIV Prevention Planning Group voted on February 17, 2012 to dissolve both planning groups to create a streamlined planning process and ultimately a unified plan for the Chicago EMA. H.L. Anderson May 2011 December 2011 January 2012 February 2012 Slide 22
19
CAHISC Processes Prevention NA/GA Eval/QM Priority setting Care
Steering Committee Initial Phase – Year 1 Prevention NA/GA Eval/QM Priority setting Care Housing Member Services Processes Governance OUTREACH H.L. Anderson - Pilot Project to assess and evaluate the effectiveness of the new planning body. Capacity Building Slide 23
20
Housing & Other Services
CAHISC Steering Committee Initial Phase – Year 2 (Proposed) NA/GA Prevention Care Housing & Other Services Eval/QM Priority Setting Member Services Processes Governance OUTREACH H.L. Anderson Capacity Building Slide 24
21
Phase 2 March 2012: Select applicants
April/May 2012: The first CAHISC planning body, strategic planning meeting January 2013: The CAHISC steering committee held a two-day strategic planning meeting to review integration progress Reviewed epidemiological data Membership survey results on integration process Compared HRSA and CDC community planning requirements 7 new models were considered H.L. Anderson March 2012 April/May 2012 January 2013 Slide 27
22
Current HIV Continuum of Care* Chicago EMA, 2010
Sara Zamor: We used this as a foundation for final model Test Link & Treat Prevent Slide 28 *Continuum revised 9/12 CDPH – STI/HIV Surveillance, Epidemiology and Research Section – 09/2012
23
CAHISC Council Model, 2/2013 Needs Assessment
Primary Prevention and Early Identification Linkage and Retention to Care Adherence/Access to ART &Viral Suppression Membership and Community Engagement Gap Analysis Priority Interventions/Services Needed resources QM Gap Analysis Priority Interventions/Services Needed resources QM Gap Analysis Priority Interventions/Services Needed resources QM Sara Zamor Gap Analysis Ensure parity, inclusion and representation of all sectors affected by HIV and contributing to the solution Slide 30
24
Final Configuration . . . the CAHISC Structure
CAHISC Vision: “Develop a city-wide plan that identifies and addresses how housing, treatment, substance abuse, mental health and other essential services can prevent HIV infection through suppressed viral load and behavioral interventions” Sara Zamor Slide 29
25
Primary Prevention and Early Identification
Goals: Decrease the number of new HIV infections. Increase number of people living with HIV who know their status. Sara Zamor Slide 31
26
Linkage and Prevention
Goals: Increase number of people linked to care. Increase number of people retained in care. Re-engaged people lost to care. Sara Zamor Slide 32
27
Adherence/Access to ART & Viral Suppression
Goals: Increase number of people accessing ART Increase number of people adhering to ART Increase number of people virally suppressed Sara Zamor Slide 33
28
Membership and Community Engagement
Goal: Ensure parity, inclusion and representation of all sectors and stakeholders affected by HIV. Promote governance though bylaws. Assure engagement of membership and other stakeholders in process. Sara Zamor Slide 34
29
Steering Committee Goal: Activities:
Ensure the achievement of CAHISC’s deliverables. Promote integration across committees. Govern CAHISC and its activities. Activities: Lead the development of a comprehensive plan. Promote communication and collaboration across committees. Organize monthly full body meetings and presentations. Monitor committee work plans. Review and approve letters of support. Establish need-based ad hoc committees (when necessary). Sara Zamor Slide 35
30
CAHISC Resources Resources outlined in the MOU with budget
Multi-program approach to support and funding Deputy Commissioner guides CDPH roles with CAHISC : Governmental Co-Chair Program Directors &liaisons support committees Special units provide support: Evaluation and Surveillance Units Consultant Un-Doing Racism Workshop H.L. Anderson Slide 36
31
Lessons Learned Need more time to complete and validate slate
Generated robust applications Brought new leadership with new perspectives & need for training Standardized community planning process for all HIV funding sources Directly supports objectives of NHAS Peter McLoyd: Conversation Slide 37
32
Lessons Learned Initially perpetuated “silos” but changed model to address this issue Selection of members was completely objective Time constraints and competing priorities for integration and funder requirements How does Housing factor into HIV planning? Peter McLoyd: Conversation Slide 38
33
Lessons Learned How do we ensure that all members of CAHISC have equal voice and a “level playing field of knowledge” Commitment and stability of leadership critical (both CDPH and Steering Committee) Reasonable timelines to accomplish all work Grantee staff have to be involved and at the table every step of the way Peter McLoyd: Conversation Slide 39
34
Where are we now? We have antiretroviral (ARV) medications that significantly reduce HIV transmission – HIV treatment and pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP). Modeling suggests we could reach functional zero in the next decade if we use treatment and PrEP in a coordinated fashion. Yet… New HIV infections have plateaued (921 new diagnoses in 2015). < 50% of people living with HIV are in care and virally suppressed. Only 1 in 10 HIV-negative individuals are on PrEP. We’re not making sufficient progress even though we have to tools to do so.
35
Why are we here? Insufficient access to HIV healthcare services for HIV PrEP and treatment. Insufficient access to essential supportive services, including housing. Inflexibility and lack of coordination in current service delivery system that puts burden on clients. Inconsistent public education and marketing about HIV prevention and treatment. Uncertainty with new Administration’s and Congress’ policies, including ACA replacement and human rights protections.
36
Where are we going? Vision: Getting to zero new HIV infections
Impact: A significant and rapid reduction in HIV transmission Outcomes: Suppress viral load in the population of PLWH (99% efficacy) Increase use of PrEP among persons at increased risk for HIV infection (92-99% efficacy) Endorsed by: National HIV/AIDS Strategy Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Health Resources and Services Administration Many local and state jurisdictions, including City and County of San Francisco, City and State of New York and State of Washington
37
ARV for PrEP/HIV Treatment Successful PrEP Use*/ Viral Suppression
How do we get there? ARV Pathway ARV for PrEP/HIV Treatment Successful PrEP Use*/ Viral Suppression *Sufficient concentration of ARV to confer protection
38
A New Direction HIV Services Portfolio
Marketing – Raise awareness in communities most impacted by HIV by building a consistent and relatable brand that educates and promotes healthy behaviors. Community Development – Address the intersections of HIV and other community needs, such as employment, violence, healthcare access and housing. Population-Centered Health Homes – Ensure people have access to high-quality, effective healthcare, including supportive services, to increase the number of persons who successfully use ARVs for PrEP and HIV. Housing – Ensure people have access to safe and secure housing, including those who don’t currently receive these supporting services: working class PLWH and HIV-negative persons vulnerable to infection. Drug-User Health – Leverage HIV resources to help address the opioid epidemic by responding to health needs of persons who inject drugs, including HCV, overdose and substance use disorders. HIV Services Portfolio Public Awareness Campaign and Health Promotion Housing Drug User Health Population-Centered Health Homes Community Development H.L. Anderson/Peter/Sara: CAHISC business must align with new direction, assessing current structure
39
How do we get there? Population-Centered Health Homes
PURPOSE: To create comprehensive and coordinated programs that help populations access and utilize healthcare and ARVs. Integrates clinical care and supportive services at the client level. Expands access to HIV treatment, PrEP and supportive services. Services reflect each step along the ARV pathway from recruitment to ARV use AND essential supportive services that help individuals successfully navigate the pathway.
40
How do we get there? Population-Centered Health Homes
Integrate funding across HIV prevention, care, treatment and housing Integrate services for HIV-negative persons and persons living with HIV – ARV Pathway and essential supportive services Can be composed of multiple organizations Can act as an amplifier for responses to co-morbidities and social determinants of health
41
How do we get there? Population Centered Health Home
Person/ Population Medical care / RX Care coordination/ management Navigation to/ through systems Health insurance / financial assistance Housing Behavioral Health (integrated into medical care) Other medical and supportive services Population Centered Health Home The specific strategies or interventions are examples. The important part of this is in looking at the impact any given service has on that particular step in the path toward ARV use for PrEP or viral suppression. While ARV use is biomedical in nature, essential supportive services are important to linking and retaining people in healthcare.
42
Moving Forward Integrated Comprehensive Plan Strategic Planning
Consider new Healthcare Landscape Invite content experts as needed to inform the plan Multi-agency / multi-funding approach: HIV Services Portfolio Create an innovative community engagement plan Peter McLoyd: Conversation Slide 40
43
Moving Forward Integrated Comprehensive Plan represents a true health department / community partnership for Prevention, Care & Housing Creating the plan affords us the opportunity to listen, share, and ask important questions to get us to the collective/common goal The plan’s focus are the desired achievements above & beyond usual funding sources Peter McLoyd: Slide 41
44
H.L. Anderson Hannah.Anderson@cityofchicago.org 312-745-0537
Contact Information H.L. Anderson H.L. Anderson Slide 42
45
Slide 43
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.