Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
1
Zen and the art of nuisance variable maintenance
Timothy Verstynen Keck Center for Integrative Neuroscience Neurosciences Imaging Center, UCSF Jörn Diedrichsen Department of Psychology University of Wales, Bangor Wales Vibhas Deshpande Siemens and Neuroscience Imaging Center, UCSF
2
Why use nuisance variables in your fMRI analysis?
The BOLD signal is inherently noisy, even after accounting for task related trends. Two types of extraneous factors: Movement Artifacts (common) Physiological (new)
3
Movement artifacts vs. your signal
Fluctuations in voxel position influence the detected signal. If movement is correlated with your task, then the mechanical fluctuations in voxel signal can get mistaken for task-related BOLD responses. Luckily, most analysis packages already account for movement signals GLM-based analyses Movement Direction voxel blood vessel
4
Physiology parameters vs. your signal
The BOLD response itself is a physiological signal! Related to breathing (oxygenation) and vascular performance (blood flow) Particularly important in areas with high blood vessel to tissue ratio. Heeger and Ress (2002)
5
Question: Why should I worry about physiological signals if they are often much faster than my sampling rate? Answer: Because of aliasing, high frequency signals may emerge as slowly fluctuating trends which may appear to be relevant signals.
6
Identifying Physiological Artifacts
7
Event Identification and phase information
8
Identifying the phase of the physiological signal
Distance = 2p Event Mark time Distance = 2*2p Distance = 3*2p For all events in the scan, the “unwarped” phase distance for each inter-event interval was calculated as: Distance = Nintervals * 2p The sine and cosine of this series approximates the first Fourier expansion of this series.
9
Phase-locked Waveforms
Respiration phase centered on the peak of the pressure wave. - i.e. peak expansion of lungs ECG phase centered on the R-component of the QRS waveform. - i.e. contraction of lower ventricles.
10
Identifying heart-rate related voxels
Circle of Willis (F’s > 20)
11
What does a true physiological artifact look like in the BOLD signal?
Voxels in the Circle of Willis Predicted = bphysio * Xphysio Residual = bphysio * Xphysio + e
12
What covariates are important to use in your analysis?
13
PhLEM: Physiological Log Extraction for Modeling
What: Transforms physiologcal event markers into regressors to be used in your GLM analysis (optimized for SPM5). How: Using the phase unwarping method described above and downsampling to the sampling rate of your TR. Where: PhLEM can be downloaded with loader functions for NIC data, examples and help files at
14
The Experiment 500ms TR 1000ms TR 2000ms TR Task: Event-related visual-motor task (variable ITI). Move your hands when you see a flashing checkerboard. Recorded Parameters: Movement using SPM realign routines ECG and Respiration using the Siemen’s physio recording system
15
The Models Simple Physio Movement
16
Spatial Statistics Simple Full
17
Spatial Statistics
18
The Region of Interest The primary visual cortex
Active voxels in the Calcarine Fissure Identified as task related voxels in the 500ms experiment with full covariate model (t > 3.5)
19
Comparing models with different numbers of parameters
Deviance: D(y,u) = -2*log([L(u)/L(y)]) = 2*(l(u)-l(y)) A residual measure on the likelihoods Hypothesis testing with Deviance: Given two models f(x), g(x) with Nf and Ng number of parameter respectively (where Ng > Nf), the difference in deviance follows a c,2 distribution. e.g.- Df(x) – Dg(x) ~ c2 Ng - Nf
20
Results: Model Comparisons
Simple Vs. Physio
21
Results: When do physiological parameters help?
Better improvement of model fits the closer the average physiological signal matches the sampling rate (e.g. the TR).
22
Results: When do physiological parameters help?
This improved model fit increases the power of task-related statistics as well.
23
Results: Model Comparisons
Simple Vs. Move
24
Results: When do movement parameters help?
The greater the movement error, the more likely incorporating it in the model will improve the model fits; however it does not appear to improve overall task-related statistics.
25
Does adding in nuisance terms like movement and physiological parameters really help improve your signal? Yes… but it depends on your imaging parameters At faster TRs, both ECG and Respiration phases help to improve the signal in task relevant voxels. This happens because the sampling rate approaches the inherent signal rate. Incorporating movement error in the GLM, however, will improve overall model fits but still impairs the strength of task-relevant contrasts.
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.