Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

NIC v3.0 Mechanical Discussion

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "NIC v3.0 Mechanical Discussion"— Presentation transcript:

1 NIC v3.0 Mechanical Discussion
12/1/2017 Joshua Held, Mechanical Engineer, Facebook Yueming Li, Thermal Engineer, Facebook John Fernandes, Thermal Engineer, Facebook Jia Ning, Hardware Engineer, Facebook

2 NIC v3.0 Configuration Small NIC with Straddle Mount
Straddle Connector Chassis Face MB NIC v3.0 Module Snap-in card guides, both sides Small NIC with Straddle Mount

3 NIC v3.0 Mechanical Goal: Requirements:
Develop universal form factors which shall include mechanicals and EMI containment. Requirements: The same NIC design must work in both straddle and right angle configurations NICs might be oriented horizontally or vertically Retention and guidance must work with specified NIC v3.0 MB thicknesses Common mechanical features used across small and large form factors Some form of mechanical mechanism is required for seating large form factors due to mating forces Design of PCB should be flexible enough to support many component and connector configurations without need of mechanical changes Recommended mechanical designs will be included in the specification to simplify and reduce barriers to adoption

4 Survey Results Requests/Updates
Small form factor ports Large form factor ports Partner Top Side KO (mm) Bottom Side KO (mm) Using QSFP Heatsink EMI Concept QSFPs SFPs 1G RJ45 10G RJ45 Fastner Use large NIC A 11 Defer to NIC vendors No Spring Finger 2 2 or 4* 2 or 4 SCR or 1/4 Yes (x32) B 1.9 Not effective 4 4 or 8* 1/4 Maybe (x32) C 11.75 2.2 Yes Latch/Ejct Yes (x24) D 11/11.5* 2/2.25* - E 12.5/25* 2.67/2.0* F 12/24* 2.25/2.67* 1 or 2 1, 2, 4 TBD G 14.47/34.8 2.67/3* 4/6* 6/8* 4/8* SCR Latch/Ejct H 11.5/12.5* 2.67/2.25* No/Yes* Yes (x32,4x8) Current Spec 11.5 ? X32 ONLY * indicates stretch goal 11.5mm 2mm 11.5mm Top Side KO 2mm Bottom Side KO Dell EMC X FB HPE Lenovo Quanta Requests/Updates Added additional survey responses (A-D system vendors, E-H NIC vendors) Current spec proposal can be seen above in the last row Added .25mm thick isolator within 2mm bottom side keep out

5 Straddle Mount Small/Large
Mounting Variants Straddle Mount Small/Large Right Angle (RA) Small/Large

6 Components of Variants
Straddle Style All form factors share same card guide Symmetric design - 1 PN, QTY 2 Guides include integrated latch pull point Three versions needed to support NIC v3.0 MB thicknesses (62,79,93) No additional components needed for vertical orientation Right Angle Style All form factors share same card guide Symmetric design - 1 PN, QTY 2 Guides include integrated latch pull point No additional components needed for vertical orientation Straddle Style Small BOM example Component QTY NIC PCBA 1 Faceplate Gaskets 2 Screws Isolator System Straddle CG 062 6

7 Module Versions Small w/ Latch 2x QSFP Large 1 w/ Latch 4x SFP 4x RJ45
Connector 1 Connector 2 Mating Force Unmating Force Small Size 4C + OCP Bay NA 64N (6.5kgf) (14lbf) 20N (2kgf) (4.5lbf) Large Size 1 2C 96N (9.8kgf) (21.6lbf) 30N (3kgf) (6.7lbf) Large Size 4C 116N (11.8kgf) (26.1lbf) 37N (3.8kgf) (8.3lbf) 4x RJ45

8 Top/Bottom Component Placement
Sizing Details Available Space PCB Size Top/Bottom Component Placement Routing Inner Layers Small Size 76x115 72x109 Large Size 1 120x115 116x109 Large Size 139x115 135x109 2mm card guide keep out - 4mm to width (card guide) - 6mm to length (edge connector) 2mm card guide keep out Requests/Updates Large Size 2 has been met with some opposition due to overall width. We would appreciate any thoughts on this. Is 142mm width not feasible? In regards to the above form factors. Is this enough usable space for expected configurations?

9 Current Small Designs FB Latch Concept 80.76mm total width
NIC depth set by latch/CG Simple card guides DELL Single Screw Concept 84.78mm total width NIC depth set by FP/CG Complex card guides Not compatible with latch concept FB Single Screw Concept 84.78mm total width NIC depth set by connector Same card guides as latch Compatible with latch concept

10 RJ45 Heights/Construction
11.5mm tall RJ at 10mm above PCB .8mm thick faceplate do-able Good clearance to latch 11.45mm tall RJ at 9.7mm above PCB .8mm thick faceplate shown Tight clearance to latch 11.3mm tall RJ at 9.5mm above PCB .6mm thick faceplate required Tight clearance to latch

11 Large Size Latching Forces
Large Size 8xRJ45 Large Size Latch Style Working Length Force/Latch Approx. Usable FP Space RJ Ports 2 Short Left/Right 15mm 5lbf 98mm na 25mm 3.2lbf 78mm x6 2 Middle Left/Right 63mm 1.3lbf 78mm split x4 or x6? 1 Large Left 129mm 1.6lbf 122mm x8 Small Size 1 Left Full Width 68mm 1.2lbf 59mm x4

12 Straddle Mount Small/Large
Vertical Stack-up 12mm 2.25mm Straddle Mount Small/Large 12mm 2.75mm Right Angle (RA) Small/Large

13 Next Steps Review DFM with vendors, feed back received
Continue concept development Collect feedback on current spec configuration Continue to close on keep outs, board size, stack up heights, EMI shielding, connector options

14 Supporting

15 Narrow Versions Lenovo card guide Optimize faceplate New card guides
Faceplate Width CG to CG Width Top Side KO Current 89 92.75 72x11.5 Lenovo CG 87 Narrow 80 80.75 See Below All 76mm wide PCB Lenovo card guide Optimize faceplate New card guides Remove FP venting Thumb screws pushed in Heatsink width reduced 5mm Chassis opening changed 63mm 11.5mm 2.5mm 72mm

16 New Large FF Double Latch
Faceplate architecture allows for latch/ejectors on both sides for more secure mounting Touch point size can be optimized for better faceplate utilization Likely needed for wide Large 2 form factor

17 RJ45 Issues Delta and Luxshare have 1x4 RJ45 sink mount designs available at 10mm height Requests/Updates Redesigned the faceplate with hems top and bottom that contact RJ45 grounding fingers, and provided stiff rib opposing grounding finger pressure Concern: if we go below 11.5mm we will be forced to a single material thickness which will cause upper flange to bow significantly in the center Need to verify that 1x2 RJ45s are available in the same height.


Download ppt "NIC v3.0 Mechanical Discussion"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google