1. Medication, Treatment, Evaluation, and Management MedTEAM
An Evidence-Based Practice

2. What Are Evidence-Based Practices?
Services that have consistently demonstrated their effectiveness in helping people with mental illness achieve their desired goals
Effectiveness was established by different people who conducted rigorous studies and obtained similar outcomes

3. Examples of Evidence-Based Practices
Medication, Treatment, Evaluation, and Management (MedTEAM)
Assertive Community Treatment
Family Psychoeducation
Illness Management and Recovery
Integrated Treatment for Co-Occurring Disorders
Supported Employment

4. Why Implement Evidence-Based Practices?
According to the New Freedom Commission on Mental Health:
State-of-the-art treatments, based on decades of research, are not being transferred from research to community settings

5. Why Implement Evidence-Based Practices? (continued)
According to the New Freedom Commission on Mental Health:
If effective treatments were more efficiently delivered through our mental health services system … millions of Americans would be more successful in school, at work, and in their communities
—Michael Hogan, Chairman

6. What Is MedTEAM?
MedTEAM is a systematic, evidence-based approach for offering medication management to people with mental illnesses
It helps those who prescribe medications to integrate the best current research evidence, clinical expertise, and consumer experience

7. Practice Principles of MedTEAM
The latest scientific evidence guides medication decisions
Medication management requires a team approach
Systematically assessing medication-related outcomes is key to evaluating clinical progress
High-quality documentation provides a record of medication response over consumers’ lifetime
Consumers and prescribers share in the decisionmaking process

8. Informed Medication Decisions
Mental health systems and agencies develop a systematic plan to ensure that decisions integrate the latest scientific evidence, consumer experience, and clinical expertise

9. Informed Medication Decisions
Medication choice
Scientific evidence
Consumer experience
Clinical expertise

10. Team Approach
Consumers and prescribers work together with a team of practitioners to systematically gather the information needed for effective medication management
Integration is important because you are treating “the whole person.” Studies have found if you broker services, communication breaks down and important tasks are not done in a coordinated fashion.
Integration includes the following:
Supported employment works best if offered by same agency that provides mental health treatment.
Employment specialists attend and participate in treatment team meetings.
They are in continuous contact with case managers. Co-locating offices with case managers facilitates communication.
Employment specialists are informed of medication changes. Medication changes are based in part on work functioning.
Treatment team and supported employment unit are “thinking together.” All staff help to identify job leads and contacts.
All staff share in a work culture.
This principle is strongly supported by numerous studies comparing integrated programs to brokered programs (Drake, McHugo, 1996; Drake, 1999; Mueser, submitted; McFarlane, 2000; Chandler, 1997; Meisler, 2000)
Despite these findings, a survey of over 125 supported employment programs in 6 states found this was the main evidence-based principle of supported employment most often not implemented (Bond, Vogler, 2001).

11. Medication-related Outcomes
The routine use of medication-related outcome measures helps prescribers and consumers evaluate whether medications have the desired effect
Research has been published on the conversion of 6 different day treatment programs to supported employment in New Hampshire, Rhode Island, and Massachusetts. The findings have been consistent:
Better employment outcomes, especially for regular attenders of day treatment (If you can make it to day treatment, you probably are going to be conscientious about making it to a job.)
No negative outcomes (no increase in hospitalizations, dropouts, symptoms, homelessness, etc.)
Programs that treat supported employment as an add-on while retaining other vocational options have poorer employment outcomes (Drake, 1998; Gowdy, 2000)
Agencies that devote resources to sheltered workshop, agency-run businesses, and other noncompetitive work options often become diverted from the goal of competitive employment (Mank, 1994).

12. High-Quality Documentation
Mental health systems and agencies evaluate current paperwork requirements and streamline documentation to ensure that the team has access to all information needed to make effective medication decisions

13. High-Quality Documentation
Developing a systematic plan for high-quality documentation includes improving transferring information after visits to:
Hospitals
Emergency rooms
General medical practitioners
Other mental health providers

14. Shared Decisionmaking
Consumers are given information about their medications, share in the decisionmaking process, and are involved in evaluating their progress
Studies dating from the 1980s have consistently shown that helping consumers to find real jobs is more effective than requiring them first to attend prevocational training (Dincin, 1982; Bond, 1986; 1995; Drake, Becker, 1996; 1999; Mueser, submitted).
Most consumers prefer the rapid job search approach over stepwise approaches, such as work units, transitional employment (Lucca,1998; Bond, 1995; Bedell, 1998). If we really believe in designing services consistent with consumer preferences, then we should be hesitant to promote lengthy pre-employment services.
Requiring a consumer to attend prevocational training first appears to be demoralizing for some.
Once a consumer begins attending a prevocational work crew, they paradoxically are rated as less work ready than those who begin paid employment immediately (Bond, 1987).
Consumers are assisted in making contact with employers usually within one month of entering the supported employment program and at a pace consumers determine.

15. Systematic Plan for Medication Management
Good medication management
Consumer education materials
Treatment team integration
Quality improvement program
Monitoring prescriber practices
Monitoring consumer outcomes
Evidence-based guidelines
Rapid access to internal and external records
Electronic records
User-friendly documentation
Flexible scheduling

16. Summary
Effective medication management requires integrating the best current research evidence, clinical expertise, and consumer experience into the decisionmaking process
MedTEAM offers an evidence-based approach to help mental health systems and agencies develop systematic plans to guide medication management

17. Additional Resources
For more information about MedTEAM and other evidence-based practices, visit: