Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Hydrogen storage Different approaches(results consistent with other numerical results) Single tube,T=265 Three tubes,T=265 Three tubes,T=77 Physisorption:

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Hydrogen storage Different approaches(results consistent with other numerical results) Single tube,T=265 Three tubes,T=265 Three tubes,T=77 Physisorption:"— Presentation transcript:

1 Hydrogen storage Different approaches(results consistent with other numerical results) Single tube,T=265 Three tubes,T=265 Three tubes,T=77 Physisorption: Results suggest that tubes should be kept mechanically separated. After simulation Storage inside nanotube: Potentially very effective (Here at 14.3wt%). Interesting flow dynamics issues at ends. After simulation After simulation Chemisorption inside and outside tube: inside is not stable but outside is stable After 15ps isothermal simulation At the beginning(5,5) d=7.82A

2 Hydrogen storage Mechanical approaches towards adsorption and desorption A B C D E

3 Hydrogen storage Smashing nanotubes into hydrogen molecular at high speed: (Van der Waals force is ignored)

4 Hydrogen storage

5 Hydrogen storage

6 Hydrogen storage

7 Scientific Issues Surface Forces: May affect the entire domain
Chemisorption Free path length May become global Geometric Restrictions Rotational motions, anisotropies, locking Interpolation Ensemble Averages Virial Stresses Stress-strain relationship Benchmark flows Poisseuille flows Couette Flows After 15ps isothermal simulation At the beginning(5,5) d=7.82A


Download ppt "Hydrogen storage Different approaches(results consistent with other numerical results) Single tube,T=265 Three tubes,T=265 Three tubes,T=77 Physisorption:"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google