1. PARCC Results: Spring 2018 Administrations

2. Change in Level 4 and 5 2016 to 2018**
Comparison of Washington Township School District’s Spring 2016, Spring 2017 & Spring 2018 PARCC Administrations English Language Arts/Literacy - Percentages
Grade
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Change in Level 1 and to 2018
Change in Level 4 and to 2018** 3
6.6
1.6 2
6.3
5.9
27.9
22.2
25.5
50.8
58.7
54.9
8.2
11.1
11.8
5.3
7.7 4
2.8
4.8
1.5
11.3
3.2
4.5
19.7
25.4
20.9
42.3
54.0
50.7
23.9
12.7
22.4
8.1
6.9 5
2.9
8.3
10.1
14.9
13.9
14.5
58.3
63.8
11.9
16.7
8.7
9.4
9.9 6
2.7
12.9
12.3
9.5
25.9
24.7
24.3
47.1
46.6
45.9
16.4
17.6
Notes: Percentages may not total 100 due to rounding.

3. Change in Level 4 and 5 2016 to 2018**
Comparison of Washington Township School District’s Spring 2016, Spring 2017 & Spring 2018 PARCC Administrations Mathematics - Percentages
Grade
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Level
Change in Level 1 and to 2018
Change in Level 4 and to 2018** 3
4.9
0.0
9.8
6.3
16.4
18.8
17.6
62.3
50.0
58.8
6.6
25.0
13.7
3.6 4
3.2
21.1
4.4
36.6
34.9
30.9
40.8
52.4
55.9
1.4
8.8
16.7
22.5 5
1.5
4.3
11.1
7.2
29.9
41.7
30.4
44.8
40.3
55.1
7.5
6.9
2.9
6.4
5.7 6
1.2
20.0
11.0
12.2
37.6
35.6
23.0
38.8
46.6
2.4
5.5
6.8
7.6
24.4
Notes: Percentages may not total 100 due to rounding.

4. Comparison of Washington Township School District’s to 2018 Spring PARCC Administrations English Language Arts/Literacy – Percentage Changes
Grade
Levels 1 & 2
District
Trend
State
Level 3
Levels 4 & 5
District Trend 3 -
5.3%
2.4%
1.6% +
7.7%
4.1% 4
8.1%
1.8%
1.2%
2.7%
6.9%
4.5% 5
9.4%
1.9%
0.4%
2.9%
9.9%
4.7% 6
6.6%
1.7%
2.2%
8.2%
3.9%
Notes: Percentages may not total 100 due to rounding.
The plus sign (+) indicates an increase of the % change from the previous year where a minus sign (-) arrow shows a decrease of the % change from the previous year.

5. Comparison of Washington Township School District’s to 2018 Spring PARCC Administrations Mathematics – Percentage Changes
Grade
Levels 1 & 2
District
Trend
State
Level 3
Levels 4 & 5
District Trend 3 -
4.9%
0.7% +
1.2%
0.6%
3.6%
1.3% 4
16.7%
2.2%
5.7%
0.5%
22.5%
2.8% 5
6.4%
0.2%
1.5%
1.6% 6
7.6%
14.6
24.4%
Notes: Percentages may not total 100 due to rounding.
The plus sign (+) indicates an increase of the % change from the previous year where a minus sign (-) arrow shows a decrease of the % change from the previous year.

14. Comparison: Washington Township vs State Proficiency Levels 2015 – 2018
Above State Average
Below State Average
At State Average
2014/15
%Met or Exceeds Standard
Grade
Math
LAL
State % (Math/LAL) 3
64.00%
66.00%
(45/43) 4
33.00%
58.00%
(40/51) 5
30.00%
45.00%
(41/51) 6
32.00%
49.00%
(41/49)
2015/16
%Met or Exceeds Standard
Grade
Math
LAL
State % (Math/LAL) 3
70.50%
57.30%
(52/47) 4
41.40%
63.80%
(46/54) 5
53.70%
61.20%
(47/53) 6
41.20%
55.30%
(43/52)
2016/17
%Met or Exceeds Standard
Grade
Math
LAL
State % (Math/LAL) 3
75.00%
70.00%
(53/50) 4
55.00%
67.00%
(48/56) 5
47.00%
(46/59) 6
52.00%
63.00%
(44/53)
2017/18
%Met or Exceeds Standard
Grade
Math
LAL
State % (Math/LAL) 3
72.50%
66.70%
(53/52) 4
64.70%
73.10%
(49/58) 5
58.00% 6
63.50%
(44/56)

16. Areas of Focus: Mathematics: Solving multi-step problems
Continue to develop math lessons to support students’ number sense
ELA:
Citing appropriate text, analyzing multiple texts
Continue to increase reading level of materials utilized in daily instruction (increased reading Lexile Levels, differentiated materials for students as needed)

17. Plans to Address PARCC Focus Areas:
Mathematics:
Implement new math series – GoMath (K – 5th Grade)
Series contains more rigorous problems, more multi-step problems than previous serious.
Professional development for staff members
GoMath, math assessment and questioning techniques
Staff to continuously reviews math standards and revise math pacing guides.
Continue to incorporate problem solving strategies into Makerspace / STEM lessons to support mathematics and reasoning strategies.
Continue grade level planning to identify and address areas in need of improvement.
Continue RTI & Basic Skills programs to support students in need.
ELA:
Continue to review ELA standards with staff members.
Incorporate multiple texts into ELA lessons, utilize Read Works & Newsela to support readers at multiple levels.
Review MAP Data to monitor student Lexile Levels and utilize appropriate materials in daily lessons.

18. Questions?