1. P802.11w report to EC on request for approval to proceed to RevCom
June 2009
doc.: IEEE /0674r0
July 2009
P802.11w report to EC on request for approval to proceed to RevCom
Date:
Authors:
Jesse Walker (Intel Corporation)
Bruce Kraemer, Marvell; Adrian Stephens, Intel

2. June 2009
doc.: IEEE /0674r0
July 2009
Introduction
This document contains the report to the IEEE 802 Executive Committee in support of a request for approval to send IEEE P802.11w to RevCom.
Document 11-09/0795r1 was approved during the closing plenary session of the working group on July 17, 2009.
Passed in the Comment Resolution Committee: 7 yes, 0 no, 0 abstain
Passed in the Working Group <result>
Jesse Walker (Intel Corporation)
Bruce Kraemer, Marvell; Adrian Stephens, Intel

3. IEEE 802 Sponsor Ballot Results – P802.11w
June 2009
doc.: IEEE /0674r0
July 2009
IEEE 802 Sponsor Ballot Results – P802.11w %
QTY %
QTY %
QTY %
QTY %
Key:
“with” = “with comments”
“w/o” = “without comments”
Jesse Walker (Intel Corporation)
Bruce Kraemer, Marvell; Adrian Stephens, Intel

4. Comments by Ballot July 2009 June 2009 doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0674r0
Key:
SB0 = Initial sponsor ballot. SB1 = 1st recirculation ballot, etc.
Coordination: comment supplied by a Mandatory coordination entity
Not Required: comment indicated as not required to satisfy voter
Satisfied: comment required to satisfy voter that is indicated as satisfied either by the voter indicating satisfaction with the specific comment, or by voting yes in a subsequent ballot
Known Unsatisfied: a comment that is indicated to be “required” by the voter, and the voter is maintaining a “no” vote, and the voter has indicated they are unsatisfied with the comment resolution.
Assumed Unsatisfied: comment not meeting any of the above criteria – i.e., a comment that is indicated to be “required” by the voter, and the voter is maintaining a “no” vote, and the voter has not responded when asked about their satisfaction with the comment resolution.
Jesse Walker (Intel Corporation)
Bruce Kraemer, Marvell; Adrian Stephens, Intel

5. Mandatory coordination
June 2009
doc.: IEEE /0674r0
July 2009
Mandatory coordination
Coordination Entity
Draft
Date
Status
IEEE-SA Editorial (MEC)
D6.0
D9.0
Sept 08
May 09
“Meets all editorial requirements. “
Quantities, Units and Letter Symbols
(SCC14)
Not required
Terms and Definitions (SCC10)
Registration Authority Committee (RAC)
Jesse Walker (Intel Corporation)
Bruce Kraemer, Marvell; Adrian Stephens, Intel

6. June 2009
doc.: IEEE /0674r0
July 2009
Note
In subsequent slides, “Unsatisfied comments” includes both “Known Unsatisfied” and “Assumed Unsatisfied” comments.
Jesse Walker (Intel Corporation)
Bruce Kraemer, Marvell; Adrian Stephens, Intel

7. Unsatisfied Comments July 2009 June 2009 doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0674r0
The table shows the count of unsatisfied editorial comments and technical comments separately. The comments are then classified into:
A – Accepted. The comment was accepted and the change indicated by the commenter was approved.
P – Accepted in Principle. The comment was accepted in principle, but a different change to the one indicated by the commenter was approved.
D – Disagree. The comment was declined and no change to address the comment was approved.
U – Unresolvable.
S – Out of Scope.
Jesse Walker (Intel Corporation)
Bruce Kraemer, Marvell; Adrian Stephens, Intel

8. Unsatisfied comments by commenter
June 2009
doc.: IEEE /0674r0
July 2009
Unsatisfied comments by commenter
Jesse Walker (Intel Corporation)
Bruce Kraemer, Marvell; Adrian Stephens, Intel

9. Unsatisfied Comments by Topic
June 2009
doc.: IEEE /0674r0
July 2009
Unsatisfied Comments by Topic
Jesse Walker (Intel Corporation)
Bruce Kraemer, Marvell; Adrian Stephens, Intel

10. June 2009
doc.: IEEE /0674r0
July 2009
Unsatisfied comments
The composite of all unsatisfied comments and the resolutions approved by the comment resolution committee received during P802.11n sponsor ballot is attached.
Double click on the icon to the right to open this.
A copy of this same data presented using MyBallot access database report format is attached.
Double click on the embedded .pdf to the right to open this.
Jesse Walker (Intel Corporation)
Bruce Kraemer, Marvell; Adrian Stephens, Intel

11. June 2009
doc.: IEEE /0674r0
July 2009
Note
Having filled in the blanks, the following slide will be brought to motion in the July EC meeting.
Jesse Walker (Intel Corporation)
Bruce Kraemer, Marvell; Adrian Stephens, Intel

12. 802.11 EC Motion – Approval to send P802.11w to RevCom
June 2009
doc.: IEEE /0674r0
July 2009
EC Motion – Approval to send P802.11w to RevCom
Request the IEEE 802 Executive Committee to forward P802.11w D11.0 to RevCom.
P802.11w had a 94% approval on the last Recirculation Sponsor Ballot. There are 6 disapprove voters representing 44 unsatisfied comments.
Working Group vote on the Motion Passed: <for> y, <against> n, <abstain> a
Moved: Bruce Kraemer nd: <tbd>
Yes No Abstain
Jesse Walker (Intel Corporation)
Bruce Kraemer, Marvell; Adrian Stephens, Intel