Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Debris Accumulation in Loads of Mechanically Harvested Oranges

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Debris Accumulation in Loads of Mechanically Harvested Oranges"— Presentation transcript:

1 Debris Accumulation in Loads of Mechanically Harvested Oranges
Timothy M. Spann Michelle D. Danyluk, Robert C. Ebel and Jacqueline K. Burns

2 Does mechanical harvesting increase the debris in loads of fruit?
Potential for damage to processing equipment Economic costs of transporting debris instead of fruit

3 Objectives How much debris is actually entering the processing stream?
Is there more debris as a result of MH? How can debris be reduced or eliminated?

4 Harvest Methods Sampled
All methods were sampled on 3 separate dates, 20 samples per date Valencia in spring 2008 Hamlin Winter Hand Harvest (control) Oxbo 3220 with & without destemmer Oxbo 3210 with hand pickup Oxbo 3210 with Oxbo pickup unit (only 1 sampling date)

5 Sampling Method All harvest systems have one common element
Transfer of fruit from the “goat” to the trailer 50 – 60 kg samples are collected as the goat dumps fruit into trailer Sample is weighed, debris is removed, sorted, weighed, dried and weighed

6 Valencia Debris

7 Hamlin Debris

8

9 What about sand?

10 Can the use of the abscission agent 5-chloro-3-methyl-4-nitro-pyrazole (CMNP) reduce the amount of debris from mechanical harvesting?

11 CMNP Trials Parson Brown Valencia Hamlin
December 2007 and January 2008 Harvest w/ and w/o CMNP Valencia Two trials April 2008 300 ppm 0, 100, 200 and 300 GPA May 13 and 27, 2008, May and June 2009 Speed (0.5 and 1.0 mph) × CPM (145 and 185) × CMNP (+ or −) March and April 2009 Shaker frequency x CMNP rate Hamlin December 2008 and January 9 and 30, 2009 Data collected was the same, except debris was separated into adhering (attached to fruit) and loose (not attached)

12 Parson Brown – Jan 2008

13 Hamlin – January 2009

14 Valencia – March 2009

15 Conclusions Mechanical harvesting increases debris 2x over hand harvesting Leaves are the largest debris component (60%) followed by small stems (38%) The use of the abscission compound CMNP can reduce debris to levels equivalent to or below hand harvesting Due to reduction in adhering debris


Download ppt "Debris Accumulation in Loads of Mechanically Harvested Oranges"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google