1. Comparative Study of Energy Assessments for Small and Medium-Sized Industrial Facilities
Muhannad Al-Haddad

2. Outline Introduction: Industrial Assessment Center Objectives
Methodology
Results
Conclusions

3. Industrial Assessment Center (IAC)
Funded by Department of Energy
Support small and medium-sized manufacturing companies
The professional support is NO Cost to participating companies
IAC focus
Improve energy efficiency
Reduce wastes and prevent pollution
Improve manufacturing productivity
UWM-IAC the only center in Wisconsin
Sustainable
Manufacturing

4. Objectives
Identify most significant Energy Efficiency Opportunities (EEOs)
Determine & benchmark potential energy & cost savings per SIC
Provide guidance for plant managers, energy engineers and personnel involved in energy audits 1 2 3

5. Methodology SICs Grouping EEOs Grouping (ARs) Implementation Rate
Analysis of 40 assessments for the years 2014 & 2015
SICs Grouping
Energy Savings
EEOs Grouping (ARs)
Implementation Rate
Energy Savings
Cost Savings
Cost Savings
SICs
EEOs
Payback Period

6. Results

7. Results

8. Results

9. Results

10. Conclusions
40 assessments were analyzed based on the SIC and EEO by considering Energy and Cost Savings, Payback Period and Implementation Rate.
5 assessments for Plastic products facilities, while millwork , commercial printing, metal stamping, fabricated metal products, and water supply were visited twice.
Commercial printing, sausages and other prepared meats, Aluminum die-castings, Iron and steel forgings, and plastic products facilities have the most significant energy and cost savings per year.
A total of 376 ARs were suggested. Lighting, motors, compressors and HVAC EEOs were the most contributing groups in the total of recommendations with about 74% and 26% for the rest of the groups. WMPE and motors groups were the most cost saving (in US$/year) groups, whereas heat recovery and HVAC groups were the most energy saving (in kWh/year) ones.
This study could be considered as a guide for plant managers & energy engineers

11. Thank you 120+ ASSESSMENTS 950+ Recommendations 1.0 Tbtu Energy Saving
$9.5M+ Cost Savings
50+ Students Trained