Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

CH EN 5253 – Process Design II

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "CH EN 5253 – Process Design II"— Presentation transcript:

1 CH EN 5253 – Process Design II
Heat Integration, Part 2 February 16, 2018

2 Books Product and Process Design Principles: Synthesis, Analysis and Evaluation by J. D Seader, Warren D. Seider and Daniel R. Lewin Chapter 9 Chemical Engineering Design: Principles, Practice and Economics of Plant and Process Design by Gavin Towler, and Ray Sinnott Section 3.5

3 Minimum Utility Target
Temperature Interval (TI) Method Graphical Method: Composite heating and cooling curves Linear Programming (LP) method

4 Linear Programming (LP) method
Qsteam - R = ….. (LP.1) R1 - R = ….. (LP.2) R2 - R = ….. (LP.3) R3-R4+75= ….. (LP.4) R4-Qcw-15= ….. (LP.5) Qsteam ,Qcw , R1 , R2 , R3 ,R4  …..(LP.6) Qsteam=0, R3=-50

5 Linear Form All values are positive
When Qsteam is minimum, Qcw is also minimum Solution 1 Qsteam =0 R1 =30 R2 =32.5 R3 =-50 R4 =25 Qcw =10 Solution 2 Qsteam =50 R1 =80 R2 =82.5 R3 =0 R4 =75 Qcw =60 Solution 3 Qsteam =100 R1 =130 R2 =132.5 R3 =50 R4 =125 Qcw =110

6 Comparison ( Minimum Utilities)
Simple HEN HEN with Min. Utilities HE = 6 ( 3 Interior + 3 Auxiliary) HE = 7 ( 4 Interior + 3 Auxiliary) Saves CW e4 BTU/hr Steam 7.5e4 BTU/hr

7 Solution to reduce number of HE
NHx,min= Ns + NU – NNW Break Heat Exchanger Loops Stream Splitting 4+2-2=4

8 Solution 1: Break Heat Exchanger Loops
Simplest Change Eliminate HE 1 Transfer Heat duty to HE 2 Heat duty C1 stream + H @Heater C2 stream - H @ Heater

9 Solution 1: Break Heat Exchanger Loops
Attack small Heat Exchangers First Cp=K an where 1>n  0.6 Case 1: small HE = 20 m2, large HE = 80 m2 Cp = K K = 19.9 K Case 2: Single HE= 100 m2 ( combined area) Cp= K =15.8 K

10 Solution 2: Stream Splitting
Two streams created from one In principle, splitting of heat capacity mass flowrate, mCp Example: Design minimum number of HE ΔTmin =10 OC MER target for hot utility : 300 KW

11 No Splitting HEN NHx,min= Ns + NU – NNW =3+1-1=3
Simple Network without splitting Where is the problem?

12 Violation of 2nd law of thermodynamics
Cold Stream, C1 Hot Stream, H2

13 Stream Splitting X (T1-90)=500 (10-x) (T2-90)=200 and
200-T1  ΔTmin i.e., T1  190 150-T2  ΔTmin i.e., T2  140 T2= 140 T1= 173.3 x= 4 T2= 135 T1= 180 x= 5.56 T2= 130 T1= 190 x= 5 Many Solutions

14 Hot Stream, H2 Cold Stream, C1

15 Stream Splitting: Solution
OC OC Non-isothermal mixing == maximize lost work

16 Improved design: Minimization of Lost work
Isothermal mixing Location of Heater moved for isothermal mixing Mixing split streams isothermally minimizes lost work

17 Optimization of HEN CP=K(Area)0.6

18 Effect of ΔTmin on total cost
True pinch is approached Area of heat transfer  ∞ Utility  minimum ΔTmin  ∞ Area of heat transfer  0 Utility  maximum Tradeoff between Capital cost and Utility cost

19 ΔTmin > ΔTthres Threshold ΔTmin
If ΔTmin is such that no pinch exists Either hot or cold utility to be used, not both ΔTthres = minimum ΔTmin below no pinch exists A chemical company wants to design a HEN with a pinch so that both hot/cold can be used ΔTmin > ΔTthres

20 Threshold ΔTmin ΔTmin=10C ΔTmin=105C Case 1 Case 2 S T(C) T(C) C Q(kW)
Qsteam, min = 0 Kw Qcw, min = 46 Kw Case 2 Qsteam, min = 6 Kw Qcw, min = 52 Kw

21 Sensitivity of ΔTmin CP=K(Area)0.6 Area=Q/(UF ΔTmin)
ΔT =UA/Q Utilities increase due to Lost work since it increases as ΔT increases Tradeoff between Capital cost and Utility cost

22 Optimization based on total cost
Minimum Capital cost goes down when A is less. This is caused by delta T being larger for Q to remain the same.

23 Distillation Columns F HF+ Qreb= D HD+B HB+Qcond Q  Qreb  Qcond
F HF-D HD-B HB 0 If Q is reduced Utility cost reduced number of trays / height of packing increased Tradeoff between operating cost and capital cost

24 Heuristic “Position a Distillation Column Between Composite Heating and Cooling Curves”
When utility cost is high Adjust pressure level to position T-Q between hot and cold composite curves Hot streams to reboiler Condenser to cold streams Difficult to position When utility cost is high and separating close boiling points Hot utility to reboiler Condenser to cold streams Difficult to position

25 Multi-effect Distillation
When position a Distillation Column Between Composite Heating and Cooling Curves not possible Feed split Two towers operating at different pressures

26 Adjust Pressure in C2 for ΔTmin
Good when utility cost high Down side Purchase cost for two towers pump cost process complexity

27 Variation on two-effect distillation
Feed Splitting (FS) Light Splitting/ forward heat-integration (LSF) Light Splitting/ reverse heat-integration (LSR)


Download ppt "CH EN 5253 – Process Design II"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google