1. The human first cell cycle: impact on implantation
Jesús Aguilar, Yamileth Motato, María José Escribá, María Ojeda, Elkin Muñoz, Marcos Meseguer 
Reproductive BioMedicine Online 
Volume 28, Issue 4, Pages (April 2014)
DOI: /j.rbmo
Copyright © 2013 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Terms and Conditions

2. Figure 1
Implanting embryos according to fertilization timing events. Asterisks indicate optimal time range for each parameter (A) 2PB (∗P=0.022); (B) PN fading (∗P=0.009); (C) length of the S-phase (∗P=0.012).
Reproductive BioMedicine Online  , DOI: ( /j.rbmo )
Copyright © 2013 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Terms and Conditions

3. Figure 2
Timings of implanted and nonimplanted embryos according to fertilization timing events. (A) 2PB; (B) PN fading; (C) length of the S-phase.
Reproductive BioMedicine Online  , DOI: ( /j.rbmo )
Copyright © 2013 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Terms and Conditions

4. Figure 3
Implanting known implantation data (KID) embryos according to Z-score classification. Z1=zygotes having 3–7 polarized NPB; Z2=zygotes with homogeneously dispersed NPB; Z3=all the zygotes with a NPB distribution not included in groups 1, 2 or 4 (i.e.>7 polarized NPB, one PN polarized and the other dispersed or both dispersed but not homogeneously); Z 4=zygotes with only one or two NPB. Differences were not significant.
Reproductive BioMedicine Online  , DOI: ( /j.rbmo )
Copyright © 2013 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Terms and Conditions

5. Figure 4
Percentage of implanting known implantation data (KID) embryos according to pattern of pronuclear appearance. Differences were not significant.
Reproductive BioMedicine Online  , DOI: ( /j.rbmo )
Copyright © 2013 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Terms and Conditions

6. Figure 5
Percentage of implanting known implantation data (KID) embryos according to pronuclear fading patterns. Differences were not significant.
Reproductive BioMedicine Online  , DOI: ( /j.rbmo )
Copyright © 2013 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Terms and Conditions