Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Accountability Work Group

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Accountability Work Group"— Presentation transcript:

1 Accountability Work Group
11/16/2018 Accountability Work Group September 21, 2016 Alyssa 1

2 Agenda Welcome, Agenda and Grounding Accountability Purpose Statement
11/16/2018 Agenda Welcome, Agenda and Grounding Accountability Purpose Statement Overview- Other Indicator of School Quality and Student Success Small Group Work Requirements Feedback Next Steps Lunch and Report Out Wrap up Nazie

3 Welcome and Introductions
11/16/2018 Welcome and Introductions Alyssa

4 DRAFT 11/16/2018 Alyssa 2 DRAFT

5 Introductions Name, role, organization
11/16/2018 Introductions Name, role, organization What is your view on accountability? What brings you to this work? What are your best hopes? Worst fears? Alyssa – specify if the best hopes/worst fears are about accountability in the state or for the work of this group or something else?

6 Updates Hub Meeting on 9/12/16
Overview of the accountability requirements and decision points Input from hub committee members on areas for the AWG to investigate 6

7 Purpose and Goals of the ESSA Accountability Work Group
11/16/2018 Purpose and Goals of the ESSA Accountability Work Group Purpose: To gather input and research on the accountability decision points in the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) in order to provide options/recommendations and considerations on those decision points for the ESSA state plan. The work is focused on school and district accountability, which is tied closely to and dependent upon state assessments. However, assessment options will not be the focus of this work. End Goal: Provide options and considerations for the accountability decision points for the ESSA state plan, to be shared with the hub committee, the Committee of Practitioners (CoP) and the State Board of Education (SBE), and ultimately submitted to the U.S. Department of Education on March 6, 2017. Alyssa 7

8 Hub and Spoke Committee Process
Charge of spoke committees: Review ESSA requirements and regulations, existing Colorado state law and rules, and ESSA Listening Tour and other stakeholder feedback to: Draft, review, and revise sections of Colorado’s ESSA State Plan; Provide options on content specific decision points Identify possible areas for additional flexibility in state legislation Propose responses to and provide justifications for decisions made concerning stakeholder feedback; and, Present and submit draft sections, recommendations , and summaries of the ESSA state plan work to the Hub committee. Accountability ~ develop a “statewide accountability system that complies with the requirements” of ESSA and state laws and policies Nazie Two to three spokes will present at each hub committee meeting to cover decision points, update on draft progress, and summarize stakeholder feedback. The Hub will be asked to weigh in on decisions points and provide input and feedback on process and direction of work. Talking Points- Is this what you all need from the spokes? What else? For those of you on spoke committees, will you think about what you need from the hub, or how you’d want to work with the hub? (AP)

9 Group Norms Participate – be present and contribute
11/16/2018 Group Norms Participate – be present and contribute Control your sidebars and technology Self-monitor your balance between listening and speaking Help to ensure that all voices are heard Find the common ground Respect for people and ideas- we all have different perspectives that are crucial for this work Speak your mind – this is a safe space Shared talking points at the end of the meeting Be a problem-solver Identify both issues/concerns and possible solutions Provide feedback on the process and product There may be homework that we need you to do Alyssa Talk about level of detail in the minutes HW expectations Systems for collecting input in-between; short on time at meetings, etc. 9

10 Accountability Purpose Statement
11/16/2018 Accountability Purpose Statement A

11 11/16/2018 Purpose Statement The purpose of Colorado’s state school and district accountability system is to provide valid and actionable information regarding the progress of all students in meeting the state standards. This information should support enable districts, schools and stakeholders in evaluating and improving the effectiveness of their systems, with the goal that each and every student, regardless of background or learning need, meet state expectations for academic achievement and growth and are prepared for post-secondary and workforce success. A Talking points- aim to support districts, limit punitive nature 11

12 Overview Other Indicator of School Quality or Student Success
11/16/2018 Overview Other Indicator of School Quality or Student Success N

13 Options ESSA SEC 1005- (c)(4)(B)(v)(II): "may include measures of–
(III) student engagement; (IV) educator engagement; (V) student access to and completion of advanced coursework; (VI) postsecondary readiness; (VII) school climate and safety“ 13

14 Requirements for the “Other Indicator”
11/16/2018 Requirements for the “Other Indicator” The indicator must be the same measure for all schools at a grade level The indicator must be disaggregated by student group The indicator must differentiate performance The indicator must be valid, reliable and comparable Proposed regulations require evidence that it increases student academic achievement or graduation rates. Proposed regulations do not allow this measure to not identify a school for comprehensive or targeted support, unless significant progress made on other indicators At least one indicator (could be more than one) (1) Demonstrate that performance on the indicator or indicators of School Quality or Student Success may not be used to change the identity of schools that would otherwise be identified for comprehensive support and improvement under § (a) unless such a school is also making significant progress, for all students consistent with § (a)(1), on at least one of the indicators described in paragraph (c)(1)(i) through (iii) of this section; 14

15 Timeline Proposed regulations indicate that the “other indicator” would need to be in place for 2017 accountability determinations (one year from now) Feedback has been provided to suggest that 2018 is more appropriate ESSA State Plan is due in March, but the plan can be amended at any time in the future. We can think about short and long term options 15

16 Considerations Value Add Colorado Priorities Unintended consequences?
How does the proposed measure aid in understanding the performance of a school/district and provide actionable information for continuous improvement? Colorado Priorities Does the proposed measure reflect Colorado’s priorities for school performance? Unintended consequences? How does inclusion in accountability determinations impact the data? Burden What is the reporting/operational burden to state, districts, and/or schools 16

17 What states have done to include this new area in accountability
11/16/2018 What states have done to include this new area in accountability GA: Basket of indicators: school climate perceptions, student discipline, schoolwide attendance, safe and substance-free learning environment indicators. Each school receives a 1-5 star rating on this which is reported separately and does not impact accountability ratings. UT: Alternative schools accountability – school climate survey; certify that action plan in place. Has a 10% influence in the model. NV: School climate improvement actions, credit earning for 9th and 10th graders, attendance. Credit earning part of PWR, school climate and attendance grouped as “other” and weighted at 10% in the model. CO: AEC frameworks – Student engagement consisting of truancy and attendance. Has a 20% influence in the model. Note: this is animated so each point should pop up with each click. 17

18 What is already in place in Colorado?
For high schools, we include: Dropout rate College Entrance Exam Matriculation Rate (Would need to disaggregate) For elementary/middle schools: Adequate growth indicators could be considered 18

19 Feedback Received from Listening Tour Events
11/16/2018 Feedback Received from Listening Tour Events Climate & Culture Examples included gauging teacher satisfaction, professional learning opportunities for staff and leadership, access to post-secondary readiness opportunities, student health and wellness, student behavior and discipline, and parent and community engagement. Capture Climate & Culture indicators through surveys (student, parent, TELL, etc.). Attendance or chronic absenteeism Engagement (student, parent/family, community) Growth Other Non-academic Factors Health and Wellness Social-Emotional Learning “Whole Child” Other Academic Factors Graduation and/or completion rates College and career readiness Use existing measures and repurpose what we are already collecting. Hesitance of adding any additional assessment or evaluation as well as additional time and effort requirements on school and district staff. Again, we need to add the context (requirements) and that not all of these are allowed (or may already be included) 19

20 Feedback from Co. Ed. Voice
20

21 Small Work Groups 21

22 Membership Identification and exit criteria for comprehensive support schools and targeted support schools Nazie English learners- progress metrics and 1st year in US testing Marie “Other” Indicator of School Quality or Student Success Dan, Elena Participation Alyssa N size, long-term goals and interim measures Tina, Donna

23 Goals for Today Build deeper understanding of the requirements around the decision points Review the feedback that has been collected so far Brainstorm around the additional information (research, data, current practices) needed for the group to provide considerations and options for decisions. 23

24 Lunch and Report Out

25 11/16/2018 Wrap - Up N

26 11/16/2018 Shared Talking Points N

27 Meeting Evaluation What worked? Small group dive
11/16/2018 Meeting Evaluation What worked? Small group dive Facilitation and having staffing at each table Food What would make the meeting more effective? Reading materials earlier Work kits (posters, markers, cow bells) N

28 Upcoming Meetings Dates
11/16/2018 Upcoming Meetings Dates ESSA AWG Meetings Other Meetings October 6th- Committee of Practitioners October 19th November 2nd November 16th November 30th (if needed) December 12th- Hub Meeting (present options) December 14 or 15- State Board of Education (present options) N 28


Download ppt "Accountability Work Group"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google