1. The same on log-log scale
For starters c axis vs B
We have a lot of this, here there is Selva’s sample compared to old BZO SP and no BZO Sp
The same on log-log scale
sample M MS
norm to 12mm, thickness 2.15 um
sample M MS
norm to 12 mm thickness 1.5 um

2. SP26
SP27 (former 25)
SP20

3. In contrast to 77 K , at T =4.2 K different YBCO CC have similar Jc(, B)
No c-axis maximum
Cusp-like ab maximum ab ab
Narrow channel to
reduce current below 500 A

4. For the above angular, maybe:
1 show that these with BZO wider
That exp fits for high fields
That GL fits for low fields-we have 1 T sometimes
If what Alex said is true, anizotropy for 1 T for NO BZO should be lower than for BZO
I did not checked yet…
And maybe something about scaling, like starting from 1 T and vs B calculate how it departs from GL
For higher fields

5. I very like this, but this is MetOx
Same data, vertical scale log
It seems that Zr samples have wider maxima than Y doped
FWHM shown in the legend are larger for Zr doped, indeed

6. (there is a better version
Is it good for paper?
Would SP be happy?
(there is a better version

7. Magneto-optical visualization reveals defects
RESULTS
Magneto-optical visualization reveals defects
All perfect
defects
perfect
bad
How macroscopic defects in substrate, coating copper etc etc
influence growth, performance? Is there any correlation?

8. Figure as this??? SP26 should look better here
Ic vs. 0/60/70/80/85/90 deg: different tapes 90 90 90 90 85 85 85 85 80 80 80 80 70 70 70 60 60 70 60 60 I c ( A / 4 m w i d t h )
0 deg
0 deg
0 deg
0 deg B ( T ) B ( T ) B ( T ) B ( T )
At 20 deg off plane: upto 200 A at 30 T
BZO doped sample: the highest Ic at 5 deg off