1. Derry-Londonderry I-93 Exit 4A Public Officials/Information Meeting/NHDOT Design-Build Public Hearing
July 25, 2018

2. Purpose of Meeting Purpose and Need Current Project Status
Alternatives Overview
Preferred Alternative A
Design Build Procurement
Project Schedule
Questions and Comments

3. Project Purpose & Need Purpose 1of 2:
To reduce congestion and improve safety along NH 102 from I-93 easterly through downtown Derry.
Needs:
Traffic is diverting to local road network to avoid NH 102 backups
Several Exit 4-area intersections projected to operate or near capacity in 2040, as well as the Exit 4 southbound off-ramp (Ignore congestion at Exit 4 on the graphic as the interchange is under construction)
Exit 4
Traffic Conditions
Green = Free Flow Traffic
Orange = Slow Moving Traffic
Red = Stop/Go Traffic
Wednesday, January 24, 2018 AM

4. Project Purpose & Need Purpose 2 of 2:
To promote economic vitality in the Derry/Londonderry area.
Needs:
Heavy through-traffic in downtown Derry inhibits pedestrian appeal and business access
Inadequate interstate access to the east of I-93 for commercial and industrially zoned lands in both Derry and Londonderry

5. Current Project Status
In the process of completing the Supplemental Draft Environmental Impact Statement (SDEIS)
Five Build Alternatives from 2007 DEIS have been reassessed based on updated information (current base mapping, 2040 traffic projections, anticipated 2040 land development and socio-economic conditions, full 8- lane buildout of I-93, etc.)
Alternative A has been re-affirmed as the Preferred Alternative

6. Alternatives Overview

7. Alternative A Facts New I-93 interchange 1 mile north of Exit 4
Diamond shape with on and off ramps north and south
Connection to the east only
Connector Road will tie in at North High Street/Folsom Road
Improvements to local roads and intersections along Folsom Road and Tsienneto Road east to NH 102 (Gap sections eliminated)
Total length: approximately 3 miles

8. Alternative A (continued)
Acquisitions: 12 Residences, 5 business units (involving 25 businesses)
Construction Cost: Approximately $41 M
Transmission Line Relocation Cost: Approximately $850,000
Wetland Mitigation, Right-of-Way, Preliminary and Construction Engineering Cost: To be determined
State of NH Approved 2019 Ten Year Transportation Plan has budgeted approximately $56.6 M of total project funding.

9. Alternative A Typical Sections

10. Alternative A
PDF of plans mounted on wall to be projected for review

11. Section 106 Consulting Parties
Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act requires federal agencies to consider effects on historic properties.
Consulting parties in the Section 106 process may include the State Historic Preservation Officer, Tribes, local governments, local historic preservation groups, local property owners, and others with a demonstrated interest in the project.
Consulting parties actively participate in an advisory capacity, in the Section review process.
Contact Marc Laurin or Jamie Sikora if you are interested in potentially being a consulting party for this project.

12. Preliminary Engineering & Environmental Project Schedule
Draft Supplemental EIS: Publish in October 2018
Public Hearing: November 2018
Notice of Availability for Final SEIS/Record of Decision: March 2019

13. FINAL DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION PROCUREMENT ACTION PLAN
Planned procurement for final design and construction upon Environmental Approval through:
Design-Bid-Build Or
Design-Build
Public Hearing for Design-Build

14. DESIGN-BUILD VS DESIGN-BID-BUILD
Design-Bid-Build (D-B-B)
Project delivery in which NHDOT completes final design, obtains environmental clearance, acquires ROW & Utility relocations, prepares Contact Plans and Contract Specifications for construction
NHDOT solicits for Design team for design and preparation of contract documents
NHDOT acquires necessary Right-of-Way (ROW), clears utility relocations and develops project construction sequencing for advertising
NHDOT seeks bids from qualified construction contractors for the “lowest bid price.”
NHDOT provides Quality Control and Quality Assurance throughout project

15. DESIGN-BUILD VS DESIGN-BID-BUILD
Design-Build (D-B)
Project delivery in which one qualified entity consisting of contractor and designer works under single contract with NHDOT to provide final design and construction services through a unified flow of work for implementation of the “technical base concept” as approved through NEPA.
Design-Build selection based upon RFQ and RFP solicitation with scoring of technical proposal through best value.
Design-Build team provides Quality Control with NHDOT administering independent Quality Assurance oversight for design, Right-of-Way acquisition and construction.
NHDOT provides sequential approval for construction project(s) based upon earlier project clearance for design, ROW clearance and contract provisions.

16. DESIGN-BUILD PROCUREMENT
Procurement Process Allowed Through Authority Under RSA 228:4 (State Transportation Projects)
Projects Over $25M need to be demonstrate benefits
Design-Build results in benefits to State more than Conventional Process (D-B-B)
Requires Design-Build Procurement Public Hearing
Hearing Date on July 25, 2018
Requires 30-day Comment Period Following Public Hearing
Comment Period will close at end of business day on August 27, 2018
Submission to Governor and Executive Council (G&C) for Approval to Use Design-Build Procurement
Anticipate G&C Resolution to be presented at October Meeting
Department Reports to Captial Budget Overview Committee within 90 days of Project Completion

17. DESIGN-BUILD BENEFITS
The Design-Build Advantage:
Faster Delivery — collaborative project management means work is completed faster with fewer problems.
Cost Certainty — an integrated team is geared toward efficiency and innovation.
Quality — design-builders meet performance needs, not minimum design requirements, often developing innovations to deliver a better project than initially imagined.
Singular Responsibility — one entity is held accountable for cost, schedule and performance.
Decreased Administrative Burden — owners can focus on the project rather than managing disparate contracts.
Reduced Risk — the Design-Build team assumes additional risk.

18. NHDOT Design – Build Procurement Time Savings
Prelim
Design/
NEPA
Final Design
Development
Working Drawings &
ROW Acquisitions
Contractor
Award
Select
Engineer
Construction
Builder
Construction Drawings &
Design • Build
Design • Bid • Build
Consultant Selection
Notice to Proceed
Contractor Bid with Construction Drawings & G&C Award
Time savings
Up to one year!
Design-build procurement was selected as the best contract method due to:
Shorten the time to getting the new bridge in-place;
Allow for innovation construction approaches to be competitively be evaluated for cost-effective means to address environmental restriction
Legislative authority was granted to the Department to allow Design-Build
Procurement in addition to Design-Bid-Build. Governor and Executive Council
approved NHDOT to proceed with Design-Build on December 20, 2010 due to
amount exceeding Legislative Authority of $25 million
Design/ROW Acq. & Construction Overlap
RFQ
RFP (Contractor & Designer G&C Award)

19. DESIGN – BUILD TWO STEP PROCESS
Request for Qualifications (RFQ)
Identification of qualified teams
Request for Proposals (RFP)
Technical proposal and determination of best value award
Process involves two steps;
Qualifying teams; and
Selection of best value award team

20. I-93, Exit 4A Design – Build RFQ Procurement Schedule
Request for Qualifications (RFQ) by NHDOT - Fall 2018
Statement of Qualifications (SOQ) from Design-Build - Winter 2018/19
Selection of Short Listed Design Build Teams by NHDOT – Spring 2019

21. I-93, Exit 4A Design – Build RFP Procurement Schedule
Industry draft Request for Proposals (RFP) - Spring 2019
Final Submission of Technical and Price Proposals - Winter 2019/20
Price Proposal Opening, Best Value Determination - Winter 2019/20
G&C Contract Approval – Spring 2020

22. I-93, Exit 4A Anticipated Design-Build Schedule
Possible Award in March 2020
NTP Construction Phase I – Exit 4 Interchange through Folsom Road: Summer 2020 (Completion fall 2021)
NTP Construction Phase II – Folsom Road through NH Rte. 28 Intersection: Spring 2021 (Completion summer of 2022)
NTP Construction Phase III – NH Rte. 28 Bypass along Tsienneto Road to NH Rte. 102: Spring of 2021 (Completion fall of 2022)

23. DESIGN-BUILD PROCUREMENT PUBLIC HEARING COMMENTS
Written Comments for Use of Design-Build to:
Peter Stamnas, P.E.
Director of Project Development
7 Hazen Drive
P.O. Box 483
Room 200
Concord, NH
Design-Build Comment Period Ends
Monday, August 27, 2018 at Close of Business Day

24. I-93 Exit 4A Overall Project Schedule
Draft Supplemental EIS: Published in Fall 2018
Design-Build Request for Qualification: Fall 2018
Special Committee Public Hearing: Fall 2018
Design- Build Short List Teams: Spring 2019
Notice of Availability for Final SEIS/Record of Decision: Spring 2019
Design- Build Best Value Determination: Winter 2019
Construction: Summer 2020 to Fall 2022

25. TO GIVE FEEDBACK PLEASE VISIT:
i93exit4A.com

26. Questions?