Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byHendri Tan Modified over 6 years ago
1
Status of the VEPP-2000 Collider Project at Novosibirsk
ISTC 1928 Status of the VEPP-2000 Collider Project at Novosibirsk VEPP-2000 team Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, 630090, Novosibirsk, Russia 30th Advanced ICFA Beam Dynamics Workshop, SLAC 14 October 2003
2
Layout of the VEPP(-2M)-2000 collider complex
ILU 3 MeV Linac B -3M 200 M eV synchro- betatron BEP e,e booster –+ 900 M VEPP-2M SND 180–700 M RF cavity SC wiggler CMD -2 ee – + convertor e VEPP-2M ( ) ILU 3 MeV Linac B -3M 200 M eV synchro- betatron BEP e,e booster –+ 900 M SND CMD -2 ee – + convertor 2 m ♦ E 1 GeV (per beam) ♦ L 1×1032 cm-2 sec-1 (1×1 bunch)
3
Tasks for VEPP-2000 e+ + e- p + anti-p ; n + anti-n .
1. To study “peculiarities” above 1.4 GeV (total). 2. To measure with good enough precision total hadron cross-section in GeV (total) - for hadron contribution to muon g-2. 3. To measure form-factors (in time-like region) for protons and neutrons e+ + e- p + anti-p ; n + anti-n . 4. For accelerator physics: “Round Beams”!
4
Increasing the Luminosity
Number of bunches Bunch-by-bunch luminosity Round Beam: Geometric factor Beam-beam limit enhancement
5
(V.V.Danilov et al, Frascati Physics
Concept of Round Beams Conservation of the z-component of angular momentum Round cross-section of beams at IP Machine optics has rotational symmetry Requirements: 4×4 transfer matrix Motion in central field with additional integral of motion reduces the transverse oscillations from 2D to 1D! (V.V.Danilov et al, Frascati Physics Series Vol. X (1998), p.321)
6
Practical Realization of Round Beams: Options for VEPP-2000
7
Practical Realization of Round Beams
Conversion of conventional machine using beam adapters Touschek problem for low energy: worse life time! (A.Burov, S.Nagaitsev, Ya.Derbenev, FERMILAB-Pub-01/060-T)
8
View of the Collider
9
Lattice
10
Weak-Strong Beam-Beam Simulation
Emittance of the weak beam vs. the beam-beam parameter. Sextupoles off. 1,2 – two codes.
11
Weak-Strong Beam-Beam Simulation
Emittance of the weak beam vs. the beam-beam parameter. Sextupoles on. 1,2 – two codes.
12
Strong-Strong Beam-Beam Simulation
Macroparticles/bunch Np = 50000, transverse mesh 128x128; Field calculated via FFT (K.Ohmi, Phys. Rev. E 59, 7287 (2000))
13
Strong-Strong Beam-Beam Simulation
Beam size and luminosity vs. the nominal beam-beam parameter ( PAC’2003 )
14
Strong-Strong Beam-Beam Simulation
Comparison of the sextupoles on and off options.
15
Main Parameters of VEPP-2000
16
Dipole Magnet (2.4 T)
17
Dipole: Magnetic Measurements
Gs
18
Dipole: Magnetic Measurements
Guiding field 2.38 T х, cm Guiding field 0.6 T х, cm
20
Quadrupole
21
Quadrupole: Magnetic Measurements
22
Vacuum Chamber
23
Single-Mode RF Cavity (172 МHz)
24
Calculated main mode & HOM
25
RF cavity parts
26
Solenoid 13.0 T
27
Solenoid: Coils Nb-Sn Nb-Ti
28
Assembly of the Nb-Ti and Nb-Sn coils
Assembly of the Nb-Ti and Nb-Sn coils
29
VEPP-2000 Luminosity
30
POSITRON SOURCE target debuncher electron gun 300 MeV linac
Damping ring To VEPP-2000 subharmonic target photo-gun linac to VEPP-4
31
hall of MeV linacs
32
510 MeV dampintg ring
34
Summary ♠ Start of VEPP-2000 construction – January 2000
♠ Dipole, quads, sextupoles, skew-quads, steering coils, 6 from 8 vacuum chamber are ready, tested and installed ♠ 13 T field is achieved in solenoid prototype ♠ Weak-strong and strong-strong simulation show high ξ for the round beams ♠ Construction of transfer line from e+ source is going on ♠ Beam → at the end of 2004 ♠
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.