1. IEEE P802.22 Motions at the July Plenary EC Meeting
Month Year
doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0
July 2010
IEEE P Motions at the July Plenary EC Meeting
IEEE P Wireless RANs Date:
Authors:
Notice: This document has been prepared to assist IEEE It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein.
Release: The contributor grants a free, irrevocable license to the IEEE to incorporate material contained in this contribution, and any modifications thereof, in the creation of an IEEE Standards publication; to copyright in the IEEE’s name any IEEE Standards publication even though it may include portions of this contribution; and at the IEEE’s sole discretion to permit others to reproduce in whole or in part the resulting IEEE Standards publication. The contributor also acknowledges and accepts that this contribution may be made public by IEEE
Patent Policy and Procedures: The contributor is familiar with the IEEE 802 Patent Policy and Procedures including the statement "IEEE standards may include the known use of patent(s), including patent applications, provided the IEEE receives assurance from the patent holder or applicant with respect to patents essential for compliance with both mandatory and optional portions of the standard." Early disclosure to the Working Group of patent information that might be relevant to the standard is essential to reduce the possibility for delays in the development process and increase the likelihood that the draft publication will be approved for publication. Please notify the Chair
Apurva N. Mody < > as early as possible, in written or electronic form, if patented technology (or technology under patent application) might be incorporated into a draft standard being developed within the IEEE Working Group. If you have questions, contact the IEEE Patent Committee Administrator at
>
Apurva N. Mody, BAE Systems
John Doe, Some Company

2. Motion 1
Motion for a Conditional Approval to forward the IEEE P to the IEEE SA RevCom
Slide 2
Apurva N. Mody, BAE Systems

3. Motion for a Conditional Approval to forward the IEEE P802. 22
Motion for a Conditional Approval to forward the IEEE P to the IEEE SA RevCom
Rules
Motions requesting conditional approval to forward
when the prior ballot has closed shall be accompanied by:
• Date the ballot closed
• Vote tally including Approve, Disapprove and Abstain votes
• Comments that support the remaining disapprove votes and Working Group responses.
• Schedule for confirmation ballot and resolution meeting.

4. Motion for a Conditional Approval to forward the IEEE P802. 22
Motion for a Conditional Approval to forward the IEEE P to the IEEE SA RevCom
Number of People in the Sponsor Ballot Pool = 174
IEEE Sponsor / Re-circ Ballot
Response Ratio
Approval Ratio
Negative Votes
Number of Negative Comments Received
Comment Resolution Status
Draft Status
Sponsor Ballot #1
Open – Feb , Closed – Mar 23, 2009
77%
91%
with 15 abstains
10 negative votes with comments, 1 negative vote without comments
= 41
Comments addressed & resolved
P Draft 7 prepared
Sponsor Ballot Re-circ #1
Open – Jun 7, 2010, Closed Jun 22, 2010
79%
93% with 16 abstains
8 negative votes with comments,1 negative vote without comments 13
No new dis-approves
P Draft 8 being prepared
Slide 4
Apurva N. Mody, BAE Systems

5. Motion for a Conditional Approval to forward the IEEE P802. 22
Motion for a Conditional Approval to forward the IEEE P Draft Standard to the IEEE SA RevCom
Negative Comments and Commentor Details
13 Comments were received from Peter Ecclestine during the P Draft 7 Sponsor Ballot Re-circ #1
Remaining 7 Negative Voters did not submit any comments during Re-circ #1
The Comments were addressed and resolved. The comment resolutions are incorporated here-in entirely and can also be found at
Negative comments resolved but carried forward from the SB and the comment resolutions are also included in the references at the end of this presentation.
The comment resolutions were circulated in the WG Electronic Confirmation ballot and we received >75% approval ratio for the proposed resolutions
Peter Ecclestine and Shulan Feng have agreed to change their dis-approve vote to APPROVE, based on the comment resolutions during SB and Re-circ #1.
Slide 5
Apurva N. Mody, BAE Systems

6. Motion for a Conditional Approval to forward the IEEE P802. 22
Motion for a Conditional Approval to forward the IEEE P Draft Standard to the IEEE SA RevCom
Negative Comments from Peter Ecclestine Received During SB Re-circ #1 and the P WG Responses
Slide 6
Apurva N. Mody, BAE Systems

7. Motion for a Conditional Approval to forward the IEEE P802. 22
Motion for a Conditional Approval to forward the IEEE P Draft Standard to the IEEE SA RevCom
Negative Comments from Peter Ecclestine Received During SB Re-circ #1 and the P WG Responses
Slide 7
Apurva N. Mody, BAE Systems

8. Motion for a Conditional Approval to forward the IEEE P802. 22
Motion for a Conditional Approval to forward the IEEE P Draft Standard to the IEEE SA RevCom
Negative Comments from Peter Ecclestine Received During SB Re-circ #1 and the P WG Responses
Slide 8
Apurva N. Mody, BAE Systems

9. Motion for a Conditional Approval to forward the IEEE P802. 22
Motion for a Conditional Approval to forward the IEEE P Draft Standard to the IEEE SA RevCom
Negative Comments from Peter Ecclestine Received During SB Re-circ #1 and the P WG Responses
Pile-on comment from Shulan Feng from the SB. Since then, Shulan has agreed to change his vote from Disapprove to Approve for this comment.
Slide 9
Apurva N. Mody, BAE Systems

10. Motion for a Conditional Approval to forward the IEEE P802. 22
Motion for a Conditional Approval to forward the IEEE P Draft Standard to the IEEE SA RevCom
Negative Comments from Peter Ecclestine Received During SB Re-circ #1 and the P WG Responses
Slide 10
Apurva N. Mody, BAE Systems

11. Motion for a Conditional Approval to forward the IEEE P802. 22
Motion for a Conditional Approval to forward the IEEE P Draft Standard to the IEEE SA RevCom
Negative Comments from Peter Ecclestine Received During SB Re-circ #1 and the P WG Responses
Slide 11
Apurva N. Mody, BAE Systems

12. WG Motion P802.22 WG Motion 10 – Document – 22-10-0127 Rev2
Motion: Request that the IEEE P TG Chair issue the P Draft 8.0 by July 22nd and launch the Sponsor Ballot Recirculation Ballot #2 based on P Draft v7.0 as modified by the comment resolutions contained in Rev 1, to start by July 22nd, 2010 and that the WG Chair request Conditional Approval to forward P to the IEEE SA RevCom.
Move:
Second:
Slide 12
Apurva N. Mody, BAE Systems

13. Time-line for the Launch of IEEE SB Re-circ #2
Motion for a Conditional Approval to forward the IEEE P Draft Standard to the IEEE SA RevCom
Time-line for the Launch of IEEE SB Re-circ #2
July 22nd - Issue IEEE P Draft 8.0
July 22nd – August 5th – Re-circulation #2
Slide 13
Apurva N. Mody, BAE Systems

14. Second: _________________ For: ___________ Against: __________
Motion for a Conditional Approval to forward the IEEE P Draft Standard to the IEEE SA RevCom
Motion to grant conditional approval as per the IEEE 802 Operations Manual to forward IEEE P to the IEEE Standards Review Committee.
Move: Apurva N. Mody,
Second: _________________
For: ___________
Against: __________
Abstain: _________
Motion Passes / Fails
Slide 14
Apurva N. Mody, BAE Systems

15. Motion to Extend the PAR of the IEEE P802.22 Standard by Two Years
Slide 15
Apurva N. Mody, BAE Systems

16. IEEE P802.22 Current Status of the Draft
IEEE WG Letter Ballot
Launch Date
Response Ratio
Approval Ratio
# of Comments Received
Comment Resolution Status
Draft Status
WG LB #1
(P Draft v1.0)
April 2008
59%
<75%
978 (526 T, 452 E)
Comments were addressed and Resolved
P Draft v2.0 Prepared
WG LB #2
(P Draft v2.0)
July 2009
80%
1383 (942 T, 707 E)
P Draft v3.0 Prepared
WG LB #3
(P Draft v3.0)
March 2010
76%
78%
725 (432 T, 286 E)
Comments are being addressed and Resolved
P Draft v4.0 Being Prepared
Based on the Resolution to the Comments as contained in Document Rev 13
As per the IEEE P WG P&P as contained in Rev 0
IEEE P is ON TRACK to reach the Sponsor Ballot in Nov and to Complete the Sponsor Ballot Process by Jun 2012
Slide 16
Apurva N. Mody, BAE Systems

17. Reasons why Extension is Requested
The IEEE P WG is responsible for three Projects. P (WG Letter Ballot Stage), P (Sponsor Ballot Re-circ Stage and likely to be sent to IEEE RevCom this year), P (Contributions Stage) – We have made progress.
The regulatory rules for the targeted spectrum are still evolving and not finalized as yet –
IEEE P has had two changes in leadership since the beginning.
IEEE P highly motivated to complete this standard is ON TRACK to reach the Sponsor Ballot in Nov and to Complete the Sponsor Ballot Process by Jun 2012
Slide 17
Apurva N. Mody, BAE Systems

18. Second: _________________ For: ___________ Against: __________
Motion for Extension of the IEEE P PAR by Two Years and Submission of the PAR Extension Request Form (Doc: Rev2) to IEEE NESCOM
Move: Apurva N. Mody,
Second: _________________
For: ___________
Against: __________
Abstain: _________
Motion Passes / Fails
Slide 18
Apurva N. Mody, BAE Systems

19. Motion to Extend the PAR of the IEEE P802.22.2 Standard by Three Years
Slide 19
Apurva N. Mody, BAE Systems

20. Reasons why Extension is Requested
The development of IEEE P is dependent upon the advancement of IEEE P Standard
The regulatory rules for the targeted spectrum are still evolving and not finalized as yet
IEEE P plans to launch its WG Letter Ballot 1.0 in August 2010.
We talked to Lisa Yacone from IEEE-SA and she advised us to ask for a three year extension for this standard
Slide 20
Apurva N. Mody, BAE Systems

21. Second: _________________ For: ___________ Against: __________
Motion for Extension of the IEEE P PAR by Three Years and Submission of the PAR Extension Request Form (Doc: Rev2) to IEEE NESCOM
Move: Apurva N. Mody,
Second: _________________
For: ___________
Against: __________
Abstain: _________
Motion Passes / Fails
Slide 21
Apurva N. Mody, BAE Systems

22. References
P Negative Comments from SB that were resolved but where the commentors have maintained their negative vote during SB Re-circ #1
Slide 22
Apurva N. Mody, BAE Systems

23. References
P Negative Comments from SB that were resolved but where the commentors have maintained their negative vote during SB Re-circ #1
Slide 23
Apurva N. Mody, BAE Systems

24. References
P Negative Comments from SB that were resolved but where the commentors have maintained their negative vote during SB Re-circ #1
Slide 24
Apurva N. Mody, BAE Systems

25. References
P Negative Comments from SB that were resolved but where the commentors have maintained their negative vote during SB Re-circ #1
Slide 25
Apurva N. Mody, BAE Systems

26. References
P Negative Comments from SB that were resolved but where the commentors have maintained their negative vote during SB Re-circ #1
Slide 26
Apurva N. Mody, BAE Systems

27. References
P Negative Comments from SB that were resolved but where the commentors have maintained their negative vote during SB Re-circ #1
Slide 27
Apurva N. Mody, BAE Systems

28. References
P Negative Comments from SB that were resolved but where the commentors have maintained their negative vote during SB Re-circ #1
Slide 28
Apurva N. Mody, BAE Systems

29. References
P Negative Comments from SB that were resolved but where the commentors have maintained their negative vote during SB Re-circ #1
Slide 29
Apurva N. Mody, BAE Systems

30. References
P Negative Comments from SB that were resolved but where the commentors have maintained their negative vote during SB Re-circ #1
Slide 30
Apurva N. Mody, BAE Systems

31. References
P Negative Comments from SB that were resolved but where the commentors have maintained their negative vote during SB Re-circ #1
Slide 31
Apurva N. Mody, BAE Systems

32. References
P Negative Comments from SB that were resolved but where the commentors have maintained their negative vote during SB Re-circ #1
Slide 32
Apurva N. Mody, BAE Systems

33. References
P Negative Comments from SB that were resolved but where the commentors have maintained their negative vote during SB Re-circ #1
Slide 33
Apurva N. Mody, BAE Systems

34. References
P Negative Comments from SB that were resolved but where the commentors have maintained their negative vote during SB Re-circ #1
Slide 34
Apurva N. Mody, BAE Systems

35. References
P Negative Comments from SB that were resolved but where the commentors have maintained their negative vote during SB Re-circ #1
Slide 35
Apurva N. Mody, BAE Systems

36. References
P Negative Comments from SB that were resolved but where the commentors have maintained their negative vote during SB Re-circ #1
Slide 36
Apurva N. Mody, BAE Systems

37. References
P Negative Comments from SB that were resolved but where the commentors have maintained their negative vote during SB Re-circ #1
Slide 37
Apurva N. Mody, BAE Systems