Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
1
National Center for Atmospheric Research
EVALUATION OF DYNAMICAL CORES INTENDED FOR GLOBAL ATMOSPHERIC CLIMATE MODELS David L. Williamson National Center for Atmospheric Research Boulder, Colorado, USA
2
Global NWP Models = Global Climate Models
Climate = statistics of weather NWP – deterministic evolution from observed Initial Conditions before predictability is lost to chaos Climate – statistics of a calculated evolution after predictability is lost to chaos (IC irrelevant) and when model has developed its own equilibrium NWP – very high resolution, short time periods (weeks) detailed fine scales Climate – low resolution, very long time periods (decades – centuries) large scale statistics
3
Climate models conceptually divided into:
Dynamical core – resolved fluid flow Sub-grid scale parameterizations – forcing What numerical method is “best” for the dynamical core? Climate models not in a convergent regime Climate models are in a forced-dissipative equilibrium Solutions depend on both dynamical core and parameterizations
4
With a given parameterization suite:
What resolution of one scheme is equivalent to what resolution of a different scheme?
5
AQUA-PLANET SIMULATIONS
Atmospheric model with complete parameterization suite Idealized surface no land (or mountains), no sea ice specified global sea surface temperatures everywhere longitudinally symmetric latitudinally well resolved Free motions, no forced component
6
SEA SURFACE TEMPERATURE
7
Community Atmosphere Model (CAM3) Eulerian Spectral Transform
Finite Volume CAM3 Parameterization Package T85 setting of adjustable constants 5 minute time step 14 month simulations, analysis over last 12 months
8
2 degree Finite Volume is equivalent to
T42 Spectral Transform with 2.8 degree transform grid 1 degree Finite Volume is equivalent to T85 Spectral Transform with 1.4 degree transform grid
9
GLOBAL AVERAGE, TIME AVERAGE
LONGITUDINAL AVERAGE, TIME AVERAGE TEMPORAL EDDY COVARIANCES TROPICAL WAVE ACTIVITY FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION OF TROPICAL PRECIPITATION (A brief diversion on double versus single ICTZ) KINETIC ENERGY SPECTRA (?)
19
PRECIPITATION
21
PRECIPITATION
22
Meridional average |7.5| to |17.5|
Examine averages over the subsidence region poleward of the upward branch of the Hadley cell Meridional average |7.5| to |17.5| Zonal average
23
RELATIVE HUMIDITY CLOUD LONGWAVE RADIATION
24
PBL MOIST PROCESSES
25
Evolution of 60-level simulation
starting from a state from a 26-level simulation T – T(0) q – q(0) RELATIVE HUMIDITY
26
CLOUD CLOUD LIQUID RADIATION
27
PBL SHALLOW PROG CLOUD WATER
28
FRACTION OF UNSTABLE POINTS
26 levels 60 levels
30
Evolution of 60-level simulation from a 26-level simulation
Shallow convection initially turns off PBL continues to deposit water vapor between 850 and 900 mb Relative humidity clouds increase between 850 and 900 mb Longwave radiation cooling increases and destabilizes atmosphere Shallow convection turns back on BUT ATMOSPHERIC STATE IS NOT REALISTIC CANNOT INCREASE VERTICAL RESOLUTION NEED PARAMETERIZATIONS WHICH ARE NOT DEPENDENT ON GRID
32
EULERIAN SPECTRAL FINITE VOLUME
From Figures 5.5 and 5.7 of Jablonowski and Williamson, NCAR TN-469+STR, 2006
33
T85 EULERIAN SPECTRAL DAY 9 DEL 4 DEL 4 DEL 6 DEL 6 DEL 8 DEL 8
35
2 degree Finite Volume is equivalent to T42 Spectral Transform
In CAM3 2 degree Finite Volume is equivalent to T42 Spectral Transform 1 degree Finite Volume is equivalent to T85 Spectral Transform Proportional relation does not hold at lower resolution 4 degree Finite Volume is not equivalent to T21 Spectral Transform
36
With aqua-planet can establish equivalent resolutions
of different schemes for unforced component But must use same parameterization suite Has been used with additional cores e.g. Mark Taylor with spectral element Need method for forced component
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.