1. Impact Fee Advisory Committee January 31, 2017
Kane County
Impact Fee Advisory Committee
January 31, 2017

2. Items to be Discussed Overview of Public Hearing
Comments Received on CRIP
Responses to Comments
Modifications
Action Items
IFAC members vote to adopt, reject, or modify the CRIP

3. CRIP Public Hearing January 4, 2017
Kane County Government Center
6:00 p.m. - 8:00 p.m.
Comment period from November 11, through January 13, 2017
7 responses and comments received

4. CRIP Public Hearing Materials
Boards on Display
Welcome & Purpose of Hearing
Roadway Deficiencies
Explanation of CRIP Projects
List of CRIP Projects & Cost
Map of CRIP Projects
Components of Fee Schedule
Proposed Fee Multiplier
Existing Land Use & Fee Schedule Table
Proposed Land Use & Fee Schedule Table
Project Schedule
Documents Available for Review
Proposed CRIP Document
Proposed Technical Specification Manual
Proposed Ordinance

5. Comments Received & Response
Elgin Development Group (Mr. Tony Lucenko)
EDG is in general disagreement with the need for County impact fees
General concerns related to the development community’s perceived negative impact of impact fees on Kane County’s economic development and competitiveness
Questioned the Flex/Industrial definition and fee evaluation and usefulness for the development community
Staff Response:
The Flex Industrial hybrid land use has been added which includes a fee roughly in the middle of the fees assessed for Industrial and Warehouse.
Language has been added to allow greater degree of choice on developer’s part to determine the manner of the assessment. 
Language has been added to recognize the fee changes between previous and existing fee structures
Staff reached out to municipalities...and a number of communities responded that they did not have any comments.
Responses with No comments/ all is good actual written responses
Village of Algonquin
Village of Sugar Grove
IFAC members sent back all is good
Bill Lenert
Dale Berman
Frank Griffin
Greg Elsbree

6. Modification to CRIP and Impact Fees (Ordinance) after the Public Hearing
Staff recommends the following modification:
Section 6; Paragraph 3 - Any new development that has received site specific development approval, shall be assessed an impact fee under the terms of the Ordinance in effect at the time the impact fee became due. However, in no event shall any impact fee assessed be greater than the impact fee otherwise assessed as calculated under the most current version of this Ordinance and its attached impact fee schedules as may be amended. New development that is assessed an impact fee under Ordinance shall not be eligible for any impact fee discount provided for in Section Eighteen of this Ordinance.

7. Statutory Steps Action:
Statute requires IFAC members to take action within 30 days after the Public Hearing
Public Hearing was on January 4, 2017
Action must be taken by February 3, 2017
Per statute, IFAC shall vote on a recommendation that will be sent to the County Board for consideration
Adopt – the CRIP and Impact Fees (Ordinance) presented at the Public Hearing
Reject in whole or in part – the CRIP and Impact Fees(Ordinance) presented at the Public Hearing
Modify – the CRIP and Impact Fees (Ordinance) presented at the Public Hearing (including changes proposed by staff following the Public Hearing)
Action:
Staff recommends IFAC to modify the CRIP and Impact Fees (Ordinance) for County Board Consideration

8. CRIP Approval - Schedule
Date
Description
Dec. 2016
IFAC Review of CRIP and Ordinance for PH
Jan. 4, 2017
Public Hearing: Draft CRIP and Fee Structure
Jan. 13, 2017
Close of Public Comment period on Draft CRIP, Fee Structure and Ordinance
Jan. 31, 2017
IFAC Meeting: Review Draft Public Hearing Comments
Feb. 21, 2017
Transportation Committee Meeting: CRIP & PH Comments
Mar. 14, 2017
County Board Consideration of Proposed CRIP and Impact Fees (Ordinance)
Advisory Committee approval must be within 30 days after the PH
County Board Resolution (Not <30days nor >60 days) of Advisory Committee recommendation

9. Thank you!