Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
1
Naval Facilities Engineering Command
Southwest CDR Mark Geronime, CEC, USN Assistant Operations Officer Central IPT June 26, 2008 1
2
CNO View of Shore Readiness
Past Behavior: CNO Mullen QFR to Congress (Mar 07) “Navy has failed to pursue a systematic, deliberate, and consistent approach to assessing the material condition of our shore facilities. I have directed efforts to … develop a comprehensive investment strategy, and to make the prioritized resource requirements clear in our POM-10 submission.” We have habitually transferred funds from the Shore Infrastructure to other priorities. Shore readiness and QOS are in a compromised condition. CNO reaffirmed 1/10/08 Future Vision: CNO Roughead (Dec 07) “I am committed to making the Navy a “Top 50” workplace during my tenure. Shore readiness is central to this goal” POM 10 is Critical to Strategic Execution
3
The NAVFAC SW Mission Provide facilities acquisition, installation engineering/support and Seabee/contingency engineering services to the Navy, Marine Corps and other Department of Defense and federal agencies
4
Navy and Air Force Installations
Navy Installations Reserve Centers Air Force Bases AFB Travis NMCRC Reno NMCRC Sacramento NMCRC Alameda NMCRC San Jose NAS Fallon NMCRC Denver NMCRC Salt Lake City NAS Lemoore NAWS China Lake NPS Monterey NMCRC Fort Carson NRC Las Vegas NB Ventura County NWS Seal Beach NMCRC Encino NMCRC Los Angeles NMCRC Moreno Valley NMCRC Albuquerque NMCRC Phoenix AFB Los Angeles NB Coronado NB San Diego NB Point Loma NMCRC Tucson NAF El Centro
6
Central (USMC) IPT
7
NAVFAC Southwest So what’s going on in our business lines?
Asset Management Public Works Environmental Capital Improvements
8
Asset Management Asset Utilization
Navy Facilities Assets Data Base is the key data source FCAP; Basic Facility Requirements (BFRs); Engineering Evaluations (EEs); Geo Spatial Information & Systems (GI&S) Global/regional Shore Infrastructure Plans (GSIPs/rSIPs) GSIPs: Underwater, Surface, Air, Expeditionary, ForceNet, Manpower, Warehousing, Training and Fleet Readiness. Establish Big Navy vision and strategy first, then feed “Top-Down” into regional Shore Infrastructure Plans and Activity master plans. Navy & Marine Corps special planning studies and project documentation: Base specific or geographic/complex specific (i.e. mini Master Plans), DD1391s, Facility siting analysis, Anti-Terrorism, Noise, Traffic/parking, Installation Appearance Plans, other misc. studies Global Mater Plans (GSIPs) - NAVFAC working with enterprise commands to identify the strategy and vision for the future - GSIPs to be executed out of LANT - GSIPs will line out the need and vision for local Master Plans (either Activity Overview Plans AOPs, Functional Plans FPs) Marine Corps still use the term “Master Plan”. - MC not doing global enterprise plans like Navy - still by base or by specific area/complex -maybe in the future as they get settled into their “Regionalization”, it may be more of a global effort verses base specific Accurate Inventories - Navy big push to get our info correct in infads - next few years, money being put into BFRs and EE updates
9
Asset Management Enhanced Use Leasing (EUL)
Projects leverage private developer expertise and debt placement for construction, repair and improvements, and maintenance services in exchange for entitlements to DoN property Broadway Complex Redevelopment 2.9 M SF Master plan Hotel/Retail/Office/Museum Uses 375 K SF Government Admin Facility Public Private Venture Partnership between a private company and the Navy that utilizes private sector resources to finance, construct, own, operate, and maintain military housing Pacific Beacon BQ PPV First Large Scale Privatization of its Kind Housing for 1,800 Sailors in 941 “market style” suites story high-rise towers Amenities include courtyard, pool/deck, Clubhouse & off-street parking
10
Asset Management Encroachment Studies/Encroachment Action Plans
Assessments of “encroachment” threats to military bases, ranges and military air training routes May lead to “Encroachment Partnering” Encroachment Partnering (EP) Systematic encroachment identification, quantification and prevention. Partnerships are created for the purpose of acquiring parcels to create protective buffer zones. NAS Fallon MCB Camp Pendleton Agricultural Out-grant Leases Contracting Officer authority for 11 Bases, 109 leases, 104,496 Acres, generating over $4M in revenue. Still have our normal bread and butter for preparing misc studies Encroachment Studies: -For next 2 years, will have some Encroachment studies -Encroachment Studies will lead into Real Estate actions with Nature Conservations groups Planning Contracts: - foresee a need to have 2 ongoing $7.5 M Planning IDIQ contracts - we also have 2-3 other IDIQ contracts that we tap into (Env NEPA contract and CI 1391/cost contract) - LANT doing “Mega contracts” that FECs can tap into: GSIPs, GI&S, BFRs. -Mega contracts, criticism from local firms is that this favors the larger firms and the little guy cannot complete. My issue is that I don’t think our customers should have to pay extra to have the firm travel to SD
11
Public Works Renewable Energy Action Plan
Renewable in place as of FY08 = 5.4MW NAS Fallon PV in development = 3MW MCAS Miramar Landfill gas to electric MCLB Barstow 1.25MW wind turbine: ground breaking 10 Jul 08 Utilities Operation Major Maintenance Projects FY 08 $21.5M program Ship Board Energy Management Pilot project to reduce utilities consumption on ships in cold-iron. $4M savings achieved. Program to continue.
12
Public Works Facility Service Contracts
Regional Acquisition Strategy Plan (RASP) Standard templates for FSC contracts Reduce and consolidate contracts Initial: Dec contracts Interim: Sep contracts Goal: Sep contracts; a 51% reduction Innovations include IDIQ umbrella contracts, price-to-budget, multiple award service contracts, commercial items acquisition Regional NISH…Operations & Maintenance (O&M) MASC…Elevator Maintenance Contract…Installation Support Service Contract (ISSC)…NAF El Centro BOS…NAWS China Lake BOS
13
Environmental Program
TYPE FY08 Program Current Contract Cap FY08/09 Planned Solicitations Restoration (BRAC & ERN) $226M $415M $1,024M Compliance $24M $47M $123M NEPA/NCR $20M $209M $98M NAF El Centro Environmental monitoring NWS Seal Beach Wildlife protection Next lets look at our Environmental business line – and you can see the division of the types of work we accomplish. This is important because we have different fund sources for each of these groups… Compliance addresses many of the day-by-day environmental functions such as Air Emission Studies, Air Toxics, Asbestos, lead based paint, storm water, solid waste, and water permits. Restoration addresses areas such as community relations plan, base closure cleanups, environmental baseline surveys, feasibility studies, remedial actions and removal actions. Environmental Planning or NEPA includes EA, EIS, Cat Exclusions, Milcon project reviews, dredging permits, encroachment and Aicuz studies, and clean water act permits. Natl/Cultural resources include integrated natural resource mgmt plans, forestry, agricultural outleases, endangered species, wetlands determinations, historic preservations, critical habitat studies and ecological consultation. MCAS Miramar Water Quality Monitoring NALF San Clemente Island Shrike protection
14
Planned Environmental Contracts
Environmental Remediation Environmental Compliance, NCR, Planning Contract CLEAN-4 A/E 8(a) CERCLA/RCRA/UST UR EMAC 8(a) EMAC EMAC (MRP Capable) SB EMAC EMAC (RAD Capable) A/E CERCLA Admin Record PERMAC-2 Contract A/E Storm Water A/E Water Quality Operational Range EMAC Nat Resources Marine Habitat A/E NEPA In-Water/Coastal A/E NEPA In-Land/Desert A/E NEPA Infrastructure A/E NEPA Ops 11/18/2018
15
NAVFAC SW MILCON Program
Capital Improvements NAVFAC SW MILCON Program $M NAVFAC Southwest Historical Execution NAVFAC Southwest Budgeted Projections Execution Year, FY08 $ 430M $ 453M $333M $250M $276M $ 422M $1.3B $1.7B $2.3B $1.5B
16
Capital Improvements NAVFAC SW construction program is rapidly rising. Major acquisition actions include: Marine Special Ops Command Establishment (FY06-08, 6 proj, $87M) Marine Corps Barracks Recapitalization (FY08-12, 45 proj, $1.5B) Marine Corps Grow the Force Initiative (FY07-11, 50+ proj, $1B+) Base Realignment and Closure Construction (FY07-10, 31 proj, $325M) Air Force C-17 Program at Travis (FY06-08, 9 proj, $116M) DLA Fuel Farm at Pt Loma (FY , incremental funding, $140M) CVN Homeporting at Coronado (FY09, 1 proj, $37M) Naval Coastal Warfare Expansion (FY05-09, 5 proj, $50M)
17
FY08 Regional Construction Contracts
Southern California 8(a) General Construction MACC $100 Million over 5 Years - $500K-3.5M Task Orders Northern California 8(a) General Construction MACC Airfield Pavement MACC $250 Million over 5 Years - $500K - $20M Task Orders Southern California Vertical Hubzone MACC Southern California Non Industrial MACC Fire Protection MACC 2
18
FY 08 Regional Architectural/Engineering Contracts
Architectural Indefinite Quantity (IQ) Contract, Unrestricted Multi-discipline 8(a) IQ Contract Electrical 8(a) IQ Contract Mechanical Electrical Plumbing IQ 8(a) Contract Civil 8(a) IQ Contract Civil IQ Contract, Unrestricted Waterfront IQ Contract Surveying IQ Contract AE MILCON Planning Above are all $7.5M/5yrs. ($1.5M Task Orders) Facility Planning & Environmental Documentation (Asset Mgmt) $40M/5yrs. ($5M Task Orders) 2
19
MCI East & MCI West MILCON Programs Camp Lejeune/New River
(By Installation & FY) MCW FY08 FY09 FY10 Camp Pendleton $366M ($173M) $800M ($646M) $1112M ($42M) MCAS Miramar/MCRD $32M $120M $80M MCAGCC 29 Palms $152M ($34M) $146M ($125M) $536M MCAS Yuma $34M ($23M) $19M $29M MCLB Barstow $8M ($7.8M) $21M Total Program $584M $1093M $1778M MCE FY08 FY09 FY10 Camp Lejeune/New River $374M ($85M) $442M ($254M) $765M ($301M) MCAS Cherry Point $12M $30M ($30M) $148M ($74) Blount Island MCLB Albany $20M $15M ($15M) MCAS Beaufort $10M $6M $13M Total Program $416M $641M $936M BQ Program shown in parenthesis 19 19 19 19
20
NAVFAC Mid-Atlantic USMC MILCON Program $M 20 20 20
21
NAVFAC Southwest USMC MILCON Program $M 21 21 21
22
East Coast BQ Laydown FY08-10
# Projects: $ Value: $654M MCAS New River – 2008/2009 3 $85M (1 package) MCAS Cherry Point – 2009 ↓ 1 $30M (1 package) MCB Camp Lejeune 3 $85M (2 packages) MCB Camp Lejeune – 2009/2010 ↓ 13 projects ($454M) (2 packages)
23
West Coast BQ Laydown FY08-10
# Projects: 32 $ Value: $1,051M MCLB Barstow 1 $8M (Stand-alone contract) MAGTFTC 29 Palms /2009 1 $34M (stand alone contract) 3 $124M (1 package) 09 MCB Camp Pendleton – 2008/09 24 $792M (6 Packages) 1 $23M Wounded Warrior (Stand-alone contract) 08 09 09 09 WW08 08 08 08 08 08 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 MCAS Yuma 1 $23M (Stand-alone contract) 09 09 09 09 10 MCB Camp Pendleton 1 $43M (stand alone contract) 08 FY11-12 BQ Laydown & Execution Strategy TBD 23 23 23
24
West Project Laydown FY08
44 Projects $740M 08 BEQ Project Other MILCON Project 08 8 $174M 08 08 08 08 08 08 28 $425M 5 $66M 08 3 $35M 24 24 24
25
West Project Laydown FY09
40 Projects $1.1B 09 BEQ Project Other MILCON Project 1 $8M 09 09 09 09 4 $146M 30 $800M 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 8 $120M 1 $19M 25 25 25
26
West Project Laydown FY10
51 Projects $1.8B MCMWTC Bridgeport 2 $7M BEQ Project Other MILCON Project 10 1 $21M 21 $536M 30 $1105M 10 3 $80M 2 $29M 26 26 26
27
OICC MCIWEST New NAVFAC Echelon V Commands:
OICC MCIWEST at Camp Pendleton OICC MCIEAST at Camp Lejeune OICC Bethesda Mission: Oversee the field execution of projects in Yuma, Barstow, 29 Palms, Camp Pendleton, Miramar, San Diego, and Bridgeport OICC MCIWEST Staffing: CAPT Campbell and 16 personnel Location: Camp Pendleton, collocated with MCIW AC/S Facilities Standup Ceremony: 15 Aug 08 This is truly a joint MCIWEST and NAVFAC effort to support “Grow the Force”
28
SAME -- Thank you for the opportunity!
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.