Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byΛαφιδὼθ Γερμανού Modified over 6 years ago
1
Agenda Item 8(b): Progress with data collection template
Progress with dangerous substances questionnaire- Main Findings
2
Main points of the presentation
The questionnaire Overview of results Some preliminary findings Substances of common interest EQS/benchmarks ELVs Exceedence Monitoring issues and data collection Follow up
3
Questionnaire Following October EAF and Workshop
Finalised and sent to MS on December, 20th Accepted answers until February,16th Designed to collect relevant information on chemical substances of concern for water A compilation of all the lists of substances of concern at EU level in order to help MS .
4
The questionnaire, benchmark values
EQS and Benchmarks : EQS should correspond to legally binding values, whereas Benchmarks do not (these are typically informal guideline values or draft EQS). ELV : emission limit values Exceedence (of EQS// good status): to help the identification of substances to be considered for the future EU wide monitoring programme.
5
The questionnaire, data monitoring aspects
'yes' means : monitoring data available for the given substance from 2000 to 2006 Category of metadata : 'yes' means that metadata are available (at least category 1, as defined in the "template"), Missing elements : was meant to help improvement of the data collection template before the data collection exercise.
6
GENERAL OVERVIEW 18 answers , 1 in preparation Substances of concern : a line in the file correspond to a substance Austria : 101 Bulgaria : 60 Cyprus : 80 Czech republic : 2038 Denmark : 253 Finland : 80 France : 122 Hungary : 38 Ireland : 31 Latvia : 23 Lithuania : 74 Poland : 56 Portugal : 124 Slovakia : 58 Slovenia : 123 Spain : 74 Sweeden : 325 United Kingdom : 143
7
Substances of interest in Europe
9
EU relevant substances (except « WFD » substances)
13
EQS for fresh water : the example of Zinc
Austria : 7,8 to 52 µg/l Bulgaria : 1 to 10 mg/l Czech republic : 0,1 mg/l Denmark : 110 µg/l Spain : 30 to 500 µg/l France : Background +3,1 to 7, 8 µg/l UK : 30 to 700 µg/l Depending on hardness From 3,1 µg/l to 10 mg /l Need for harmonisation
14
Range of EQS for substances of common interest.
15
EQS and Benchmark for sediment
LITHUANIA : 2 substances UK : 1 substance Benchmark CZECH REPUBLIC : 9 for metals FINLAND : 26 for organic substances LITHUANIA : 6 for metals SLOVENIA : 134 ?? SPAIN : 8 substances with assessment of temporal trends
16
EQS and Benchmark for biota
CZECH REPUBLIC : Mercury 0,1 mg/kg LITHUANIA Lindane : 0,05 mg/kg HCH : 2,5 mg/kg Portugal Mercury 0,3 mg/kg Benchmark LITHUANIA lead and cadmium SPAIN : 29 substances with assessment of temporal trends Finland : 27 substances
17
Emission limit values : 14//18 answers
18
Exceedence Answers from 10 MS No Answers from 8 MS
UK : « Don ’t know » answers for the 143 substances of concern
20
Exceedence Substances for more than 5% of stations impacted
Copper 4 Mercury 4 Zinc 3 Ammonia 2 Cadmium 2 Chromium 2 Cyanides 2 Substances for less than 5% of stations impacted Copper Chloroform : 5 Lead 5 Nickel 5 Zinc 5 Arsenic 4 Cadmium 4
21
Substances of interest for EU-wide data collection
22
EU-wide data collection for other substances than WFD ’s
COPPER : 7 MS ZINC : 7 MS CHROMIUM : 6 CYANIDES : 5 ARSENIC and its mineral compounds : 4
23
Monitoring data (2000-2006) available in more than 6 MS
No WFD Substances
24
Monitoring data available in more than 3 MS (No « WFD » substances)
25
14 MS answers for category 1 data available
26
Category 1 metadata missing
14 MS answered on available monitoring data 8 answered on « category 1 » available: What about the 6 others ? 6 MS underlined what are the missing categories Portugal : analysed fraction ?? Austria : Uncertainty and Laboratory name Czech republic : country code, CAS number and LoD ( LoQ ??) Finland : Uncertainty Hungary : Uncertainty Lithuania : Uncertainty
27
inorganic substances from 76/464 list II
Follow up Some MS are still preparing answers or addition to answers (Germany, France, Norway, ...) The database has to be checked and cleaned for : numerical values for EQS and Benchmarks CAS numbers Some answers have to be checked with MS (Yes , No, significance of « No answers » Main conclusion for substances of interest in term of EU relevance (monitoring or EQS ): inorganic substances from 76/464 list II
28
Thank you for your attention
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.