Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Quality Assurance Measures for High Frequency Radar Systems

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Quality Assurance Measures for High Frequency Radar Systems"— Presentation transcript:

1 Quality Assurance Measures for High Frequency Radar Systems
Hugh Roarty , Ethan Handel, Erick Rivera, Mike Smith, Colin Evans, John Kerfoot, Josh Kohut ,Scott Glenn Coastal Ocean Observation Laboratory Institute of Marine & Coastal Sciences Rutgers University Quality Assurance Measures for High Frequency Radar Systems ABSTRACT MEASURED VS. IDEAL RADIALS USE OF OPTIMAL INTERPOLATION A High Frequency radar network is a major component of the Mid-Atlantic Regional Association Coastal Ocean Observing System (MARACOOS). This network has provided hourly surface current measurements to the US Coast Guard since In order to ensure that the data that is being sent to the Coast Guard for search and rescue is of the highest quality, a study of the radial vector generation and the combination of those radials into totals was conducted. The options available to the user were examined for their potential benefit. Initial findings indicate the use of measured antenna patterns gives improved results. Kohut and Glenn (2003) and Paduan et al. (2006) have shown that the use of measured patterns improves results. The use of measured antenna patterns comes at an additional cost to the operator. We must understand the benefit of using measured antenna patterns to see if the cost is warranted. This will hold implications for the ~120 radars deployed around the country. OI Settings Sx 10 km Model Variance 420 cm2/s2 U error < 0.6 Sy 10 km Error Variance 66 cm2/s2 V error < UWLS Settings Spatial Threshold 10 km GDOP < 1.25 + toward the radar - Away from Two outliers Zero outliers UWLS OI Gulf of Maine Coverage 26% RMS U 15.9 15.2 RMS V 22.8 20.1 Mid Atlantic Bight 53% 65% 7.4 8.4 9.8 11.8 South Atlantic Bight West Florida Shelf 50% 41% 11.7 11.5 13.4 12.9 Gulf of Mexico 49% 47% 14.0 13.7 11.1 USE OF THE ANGSEG.TXT FILE Several options exist to the SeaSonde operator when measuring surface currents. Through the use of the AngSeg.txt file, radials over user defined sectors can be removed or radial velocities sent to the MUSIC direction finding algorithm can be forced over water. The potential benefit of these options is explored below. Drifters from NOAA NEFSC Spectra Read In Spectra Apply phases.txt to the ideal pattern , SeaSondeRadialSetup Apply sea-echo amplitudes factors to the spectra, averaging the last 6hrs of amplitude calculations from the CSS Pattern Method Default Water Only Spectra analyzed using MUSIC algorithm Radial File AngSeg applied to Radial File Filtered Radial File AngSeg applied to pattern RadialSlider Apply amplitude correction factors for Loops 1 and 2, Line 17 of header.txt, default value 1.0 and 1.0 The two boxes in yellow are skipped for the Measured pattern since the measured phases and amplitudes of the antenna are in the measured pattern. Samples 1849 R 0.70 RMS Diff 13.7 cm/s Y=0.62x-5.1 Samples 1483 R 0.70 RMS Diff 13.5 cm/s Y=0.68x-3.7 Radial grid from the WILD HF Radar site overlaid with the location of the four moorings deployed as part of the 2007 Mid Shelf Front experiment. The data from these moorings was used as validation comparison against the settings changes on the HF radar. T_Tide Analysis of the Ideal Radials, Measured Radials and the ADCP (4.4 m below the surface) Gulf of Maine Mid Atlantic Bight WILD Radial Velocities and ADCP Comparison Radial Shorts, Every 30 minutes, 1 degree Major reason why operators don’t use measured radials, gaps in coverage Case Radial Type Pattern Method Corr RMS Diff Sample Size 11 Ideal Water Only 0.77 24.7 cm/s 14 Meas 0.84 19.0 cm/s 15 Anywhere 0.78 25.0 cm/s 13 Water Only Radials Anywhere West Florida Shelf Radial Shorts, Every 30 minutes, merged to 5 degree Ideal Radial Coverage – 3 days Measured Radial Coverage – 3 days Case Radial Type Pattern Method Corr RMS Diff Sample Size 11 Ideal Water Only 0.44 27.5 cm/s 38 Meas 0.72 23.3 cm/s 37 14 Anywhere 0.51 26.7 cm/s 35 Case 9 Case 11 Case 12 Case 13 Case 14 Coverage Time 180 min 120 min 240 min Output Interval 60 min Doppler Interpolation Did not exist Off Pattern Method 2 water only 0 Anywhere AngSeg On Type of Pattern Measured 2006 (170° coverage) Gulf of Mexico S. Atl. Bight RECOMMENDATIONS FOR NATIONAL NETWORK Use measured antenna patterns when available Develop a Best Practices Document for measuring and processing an antenna patterns


Download ppt "Quality Assurance Measures for High Frequency Radar Systems"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google