1. State Tracker Program Feedback
State Tracker program – launched in Fall 2013.
July 2016 – Sought feedback from State Trackers.
32 respondents = 30% response rate
Goal: Determine satisfaction level with program.
Goal: Identify improvements in anticipation of the 2017 legislative session.
Goal: Gauge interest of current State Trackers in the continuation of duties in 2017, as well as the need to recruit new State Trackers.

2. State Tracker Program Feedback

3. 1 = too many irrelevant bills
State Tracker Program Feedback
1 = too many irrelevant bills
5 = optimal relevance
Note: Efforts already underway to modify our search terms, while still ensuring keys bills are captured!

4. State Tracker Program Feedback

5. State Tracker Program Feedback
1 = Very Dissatisfied
5 = Very Satisfied

6. State Tracker Program Feedback
Note: Efforts already underway to identify those State Trackers planning to step down for New recruits will be needed!

7. Summary of Feedback
Checking Reports: 40% are doing it daily, while most check intermittently.
Monthly calls: 21% participate every month, while most do it 1-3 times per session (6 calls held each year).
Time Commitment: 75% are fine with the commitment. 25% are not.
Relevance of bills: 50% are satisfied. 50% are not.
Top Issue: Scope of Practice – 80% of responses.
Memberships: 88% are members of their State OTO Society, while 66% are members of their State Medical Society.
Satisfaction: 94% are satisfied or very satisfied with the program. Only 2 people gave the program a low grade.
2017 Service: 40% are likely to track next year. 26% are unsure. 34% will not likely continue to serve.