1. The Mechanism of the vdW-to-Covalent Well Transitions
We found that a small group of trajectories (~10% of the sample) make the dominant contribution to the stabilization (~65% of the cross section). They describe the super-collision events:
t = a.u.

2. The Mechanism of the vdW-to-Covalent Well Transitions
We found that a small group of trajectories (~10% of the sample) make the dominant contribution to the stabilization (~65% of the cross section). They describe the super-collision events:
t = a.u.

3. The Mechanism of the vdW-to-Covalent Well Transitions
We found that a small group of trajectories (~10% of the sample) make the dominant contribution to the stabilization (~65% of the cross section). They describe the super-collision events:
t = a.u.

4. The Mechanism of the vdW-to-Covalent Well Transitions
We found that a small group of trajectories (~10% of the sample) make the dominant contribution to the stabilization (~65% of the cross section). They describe the super-collision events:
t = a.u.

5. The Mechanism of the vdW-to-Covalent Well Transitions
We found that a small group of trajectories (~10% of the sample) make the dominant contribution to the stabilization (~65% of the cross section). They describe the super-collision events:
t = a.u.

6. The Mechanism of the vdW-to-Covalent Well Transitions
We found that a small group of trajectories (~10% of the sample) make the dominant contribution to the stabilization (~65% of the cross section). They describe the super-collision events:
t = a.u.

7. The Mechanism of the vdW-to-Covalent Well Transitions
We found that a small group of trajectories (~10% of the sample) make the dominant contribution to the stabilization (~65% of the cross section). They describe the super-collision events:
t = a.u.

8. The Mechanism of the vdW-to-Covalent Well Transitions
We found that a small group of trajectories (~10% of the sample) make the dominant contribution to the stabilization (~65% of the cross section). They describe the super-collision events:
t = a.u.

9. The Mechanism of the vdW-to-Covalent Well Transitions
We found that a small group of trajectories (~10% of the sample) make the dominant contribution to the stabilization (~65% of the cross section). They describe the super-collision events:
t = a.u.

10. The Mechanism of the vdW-to-Covalent Well Transitions
We found that a small group of trajectories (~10% of the sample) make the dominant contribution to the stabilization (~65% of the cross section). They describe the super-collision events:
t = a.u.

11. The Mechanism of the vdW-to-Covalent Well Transitions
We found that a small group of trajectories (~10% of the sample) make the dominant contribution to the stabilization (~65% of the cross section). They describe the super-collision events:
t = a.u.

12. The Mechanism of the vdW-to-Covalent Well Transitions
We found that a small group of trajectories (~10% of the sample) make the dominant contribution to the stabilization (~65% of the cross section). They describe the super-collision events:
t = a.u.

13. The Mechanism of the vdW-to-Covalent Well Transitions
We found that a small group of trajectories (~10% of the sample) make the dominant contribution to the stabilization (~65% of the cross section). They describe the super-collision events:
t = a.u.

14. The Mechanism of the vdW-to-Covalent Well Transitions
We found that a small group of trajectories (~10% of the sample) make the dominant contribution to the stabilization (~65% of the cross section). They describe the super-collision events:
t = a.u.

15. The Mechanism of the vdW-to-Covalent Well Transitions
We found that a small group of trajectories (~10% of the sample) make the dominant contribution to the stabilization (~65% of the cross section). They describe the super-collision events:
t = a.u.

16. The Mechanism of the vdW-to-Covalent Well Transitions
We found that a small group of trajectories (~10% of the sample) make the dominant contribution to the stabilization (~65% of the cross section). They describe the super-collision events:
t = a.u.

17. The Mechanism of the vdW-to-Covalent Well Transitions
We found that a small group of trajectories (~10% of the sample) make the dominant contribution to the stabilization (~65% of the cross section). They describe the super-collision events:
t = a.u.

18. The Mechanism of the vdW-to-Covalent Well Transitions
We found that a small group of trajectories (~10% of the sample) make the dominant contribution to the stabilization (~65% of the cross section). They describe the super-collision events:
t = a.u.

19. The Mechanism of the vdW-to-Covalent Well Transitions
We found that a small group of trajectories (~10% of the sample) make the dominant contribution to the stabilization (~65% of the cross section). They describe the super-collision events:
t = a.u.

20. The Mechanism of the vdW-to-Covalent Well Transitions
We found that a small group of trajectories (~10% of the sample) make the dominant contribution to the stabilization (~65% of the cross section). They describe the super-collision events:
t = a.u.

21. The Mechanism of the vdW-to-Covalent Well Transitions
We found that a small group of trajectories (~10% of the sample) make the dominant contribution to the stabilization (~65% of the cross section). They describe the super-collision events:
t = a.u.

22. The Mechanism of the vdW-to-Covalent Well Transitions
We found that a small group of trajectories (~10% of the sample) make the dominant contribution to the stabilization (~65% of the cross section). They describe the super-collision events:
t = a.u.

23. The Mechanism of the vdW-to-Covalent Well Transitions
We found that a small group of trajectories (~10% of the sample) make the dominant contribution to the stabilization (~65% of the cross section). They describe the super-collision events:
t = a.u.

24. The Mechanism of the vdW-to-Covalent Well Transitions
We found that a small group of trajectories (~10% of the sample) make the dominant contribution to the stabilization (~65% of the cross section). They describe the super-collision events:
t = a.u.

25. The Mechanism of the vdW-to-Covalent Well Transitions
We found that a small group of trajectories (~10% of the sample) make the dominant contribution to the stabilization (~65% of the cross section). They describe the super-collision events:
t = a.u.

26. The Mechanism of the vdW-to-Covalent Well Transitions
We found that a small group of trajectories (~10% of the sample) make the dominant contribution to the stabilization (~65% of the cross section). They describe the super-collision events:
t = a.u.

27. The Mechanism of the vdW-to-Covalent Well Transitions
We found that a small group of trajectories (~10% of the sample) make the dominant contribution to the stabilization (~65% of the cross section). They describe the super-collision events:
t = a.u.

28. The Mechanism of the vdW-to-Covalent Well Transitions
We found that a small group of trajectories (~10% of the sample) make the dominant contribution to the stabilization (~65% of the cross section). They describe the super-collision events:
t = a.u.

29. The Mechanism of the vdW-to-Covalent Well Transitions
We found that a small group of trajectories (~10% of the sample) make the dominant contribution to the stabilization (~65% of the cross section). They describe the super-collision events:
t = a.u.

30. The Mechanism of the vdW-to-Covalent Well Transitions
We found that a small group of trajectories (~10% of the sample) make the dominant contribution to the stabilization (~65% of the cross section). They describe the super-collision events:
t = a.u.

31. The Mechanism of the vdW-to-Covalent Well Transitions
We found that a small group of trajectories (~10% of the sample) make the dominant contribution to the stabilization (~65% of the cross section). They describe the super-collision events:
t = a.u.

32. The Mechanism of the vdW-to-Covalent Well Transitions
We found that a small group of trajectories (~10% of the sample) make the dominant contribution to the stabilization (~65% of the cross section). They describe the super-collision events:
t = a.u.