Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Differences between the groups Results: Adult Characteristics

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Differences between the groups Results: Adult Characteristics"— Presentation transcript:

1 Differences between the groups Results: Adult Characteristics
Influence of adults, clinicians, and environments upon type of psychiatric hospitalization Christine R. Wydeen, Ph.D. Introduction Method (cont’d) Differences between the groups Conclusion The costs associated with the psychiatric hospitalization of adults are immense (Geppert, 2003; Murray & Lopez, 1996) Personal losses from mental illness to the adult and the current system of care are being calculated (Stein et al., 2005) PA goals are that no adult should be involuntarily hospitalized >2/year Predictor variables have been identified leading to an adult’s first and subsequent psychiatric hospitalization (Arfken et al., 2002) The role of ED utilization by this population, and description of unmet needs within the literature (Gibbons et al., 2005; Hackman et al., 2006; Stanton, 2007) The variables within the adult, the assessing clinician, and the environment speak to the complexity of the process leading to hospitalization (Walsh et al., 2005) To inform clinicians and policy makers, the study describes the differences between the 2 groups; identifies which variables are most important in predicting probability of involuntary hospitalization Dependent Variable: Hospitalization Type (Voluntary/Involuntary) Analyses: Chi-square to investigate the differences between the groups (voluntary vs. involuntary): see Table 2. Multiple logistic regression analyses of those variables with significant beta weights (age group, symptom manifestation, and diagnosis) conducted to predict the probability of involuntary hospitalization Table 2. Better understanding of the factors associated with depression in the young adult, the potential life and earning potential lost due to mental illness is needed (Geppert, 2003) The regression model that included age group, symptom manifestation, and diagnostic categories correctly classified 80% of the cases into the involuntary group: noting significant change in the likelihood for those age and 65+ Future research is needed to better understand the complexity of the clinical assessment process as an opportunity to divert hospitalization once an adult presents to an ED Efforts must be made to ensure that behavioral health services are well integrated into the community, and that decreasing in-patient utilization is offset by the increased 24-hour community based services responsive to those they serve (Stein et al., 2005) Variable n OR p-value Age (yrs) <.001 18 – 45 – Symptom Manifestation <.001 Intrinsic Extrinsic Both Diagnosis <.001 Depressive Disorder Bipolar Disorder Schizophrenia Dementia Results: Adult Characteristics Table 1. Variable n___ Total Gender Female Male Age (yrs) County A B C Other Symptom Manifestation Extrinsic Intrinsic Both Diagnosis Depressive Disorder 937 Bipolar Disorder Schizophrenia Psychotic Disorders 129 Anxiety Disorders Dementia Hx. of Prior Hospitalization No Yes Voluntary Admissions Involuntary Admissions _________________________________________ Those 65+ were involuntarily hospitalized 49% of the time, all other age categories had a much greater percentage within the voluntary category Adults classified as presenting intrinsic symptom manifestation had 84% voluntary admissions Dementia led to involuntary hospitalization over 94% of the time 49% male, 51% female 43% between the ages of 18 – 34; 5% were 60+ 82% presented with intrinsic symptom manifestation (behaviors directed toward self harm) 54% diagnosed with Depressive Disorder 75% of the admissions occurred thru one agency 72% occurred from ED’s after normal agency business hours: 77% voluntary, 23% involuntary 78% were voluntary admissions; 22% involuntary 47% had a history of prior hospitalization Clinician Sample (43): 9 accounted for 70% of the admissions – 5/9 were BA; 58% had Masters and completed 30% of the assessments; 40% BA’s did 58%. Of the total, 42% had 11+ yrs. experience References Arfken, C.J., Zeman, L.L., Yeager, L., Mischel, E. & Amirsadri, A. (2002). Frequent visitors to psychiatric emergency services: staff attitudes and temporal patterns. Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research 29: Geppert, C.M.A. (2003). Lost years. Psychiatric Times 20:26-28. Gibbons,C., Bedard, M., & Mack, G. (2005). A comparison of client and mental health worker assessment of needs and unmet needs. Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research 32: Hackman, A.L., Goldberg, R.W., Brown, C.H., Fang, L.J., Dickerson, F.B., Wohlheiter, K., Medoff, D.R., Kreyenbuhl, J.A., & Dixon, L. (2006). Use of emergency department services for somatic reasons by people with serious mental illness. Psychiatric Services 57: Murray, C.J.L. & Lopez, A.D. (1996). The global burden of disease. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard School of Public Health. Stanton, K. (2007). Communicating with ED patients who have chronic mental illnesses. American Journal of Nursing 107:61-65. Stein, C.H., Dworsky, D.O., Phillips, R.E., & Hunt, M.G. (2005). Measuring personal loss among adults coping with serious mental illness. Community Mental Health Journal 41: Walsh, J., Green, R., Matthews, J., & Bonucelli-Puerto, B. (2005). Social Workers’ views of the etiology of mental disorders: results of a national study. Social Work 50:43-53. Method Sample and data source: Using administrative data from a 3-County MH/MR Administrative Unit, identified 1724 adults hospitalized within a 12-month period in PA At the time of the study, all admissions passed through this county authorizing unit Sample of 43/59 (73%) clinicians that completed the clinical assessments that led to the hospitalization approval by the attending physician was also included Variables of interest: Within the adult: see Table 1. Clinician variables included educational background/area of concentration, experience, and proportion of admissions within the 12-month period Environmental variables included setting, date, and time Disclosure of Interest: Dr. Wydeen is affiliated with Community Care Behavioral Health Organization (570) ;


Download ppt "Differences between the groups Results: Adult Characteristics"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google