TGn Opening Report Orlando, FL, US 802 Plenary – March ‘07

TGn Opening Report Orlando, FL, US 802 Plenary – 12-16 March ‘07
doc.: IEEE /0211r0 March 2007 TGn Opening Report Orlando, FL, US 802 Plenary – March ‘07 Date: Authors: Notice: This document has been prepared to assist IEEE It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein. Release: The contributor grants a free, irrevocable license to the IEEE to incorporate material contained in this contribution, and any modifications thereof, in the creation of an IEEE Standards publication; to copyright in the IEEE’s name any IEEE Standards publication even though it may include portions of this contribution; and at the IEEE’s sole discretion to permit others to reproduce in whole or in part the resulting IEEE Standards publication. The contributor also acknowledges and accepts that this contribution may be made public by IEEE Patent Policy and Procedures: The contributor is familiar with the IEEE 802 Patent Policy and Procedures < ieee802.org/guides/bylaws/sb-bylaws.pdf>, including the statement "IEEE standards may include the known use of patent(s), including patent applications, provided the IEEE receives assurance from the patent holder or applicant with respect to patents essential for compliance with both mandatory and optional portions of the standard." Early disclosure to the Working Group of patent information that might be relevant to the standard is essential to reduce the possibility for delays in the development process and increase the likelihood that the draft publication will be approved for publication. Please notify the Chair as early as possible, in written or electronic form, if patented technology (or technology under patent application) might be incorporated into a draft standard being developed within the IEEE Working Group. If you have questions, contact the IEEE Patent Committee Administrator at Name Company Address Phone Bruce Kraemer Marvell +1 - 321 4 27 4098 marvell .com Garth Hillman AMD 5402 East Ben White, Austin TX 78741 +1 (512) 602 7869 Sheung Li Atheros 5480 GAP , Santa Clara, CA 95054 +1 (408) 773 5295 Adrian Stephens Intel Corporation 15 JJ Thompson Avenue, Cambridge, CB3 0FD, UK +1 (503) 616 3800 om 5488 Marvell Lane, Santa Clara, CA, 95054 Bruce Kraemer, Marvell Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

March 2007 doc.: IEEE /0211r0 March 2007 Welcome to Orlando, Florida Monday – Friday, March This document 07/0211 Caribe Royale Meetings Rooms TGN 1 (Main Room) = Grand Sierra D TGN 2 (ad hoc) = Curacao 5 & 6 TGN 3 (ad hoc) = Curacao 7 & 8 Bruce Kraemer, Marvell Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

March 2007 Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

Inappropriate Topics for IEEE WG Meetings
March 2007 doc.: IEEE /0211r0 Inappropriate Topics for IEEE WG Meetings March 2007 Don’t discuss the validity/essentiality of patents/patent claims Don’t discuss the cost of specific patent use Don’t discuss licensing terms or conditions Don’t discuss product pricing, territorial restrictions, or market share Don’t discuss ongoing litigation or threatened litigation Don’t be silent if inappropriate topics are discussed… do formally object. If you have questions, contact the IEEE-SA Standards Board Patent Committee Administrator at or visit This slide set is available at Approved by IEEE-SA Standards Board – March 2003 (Revised January 2006) Bruce Kraemer, Marvell Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

Attendance, Voting & Document Status
March 2007 Attendance, Voting & Document Status Make sure your badges are correct If you plan to make a submission be sure it does not contain company logos or advertising Questions on Voting status, Ballot pool, Access to Reflector , Documentation, member’s area see Harry Worstell – Cell Phones Silent or Off Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

Templates changed Jan ‘07 - Note
March 2007 doc.: IEEE /0211r0 March 2007 Templates changed Jan ‘07 - Note Notice: This document has been prepared to assist IEEE It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein. Release: The contributor grants a free, irrevocable license to the IEEE to incorporate material contained in this contribution, and any modifications thereof, in the creation of an IEEE Standards publication; to copyright in the IEEE’s name any IEEE Standards publication even though it may include portions of this contribution; and at the IEEE’s sole discretion to permit others to reproduce in whole or in part the resulting IEEE Standards publication. The contributor also acknowledges and accepts that this contribution may be made public by IEEE Patent Policy and Procedures: The contributor is familiar with the IEEE 802 Patent Policy and Procedures < > , including the statement "IEEE standards may include the known use of patent(s), including patent applications, provided the IEEE receives assurance from the patent holder or applicant with respect to patents essential for compliance with both mandatory and optional portions of the standard." Early disclosure to the Working Group of patent information that might be relevant to the standard is essential to reduce the possibility for delays in the development process and increase the likelihood that the draft publication will be approved for publication. Please notify the Chair as early as possible, in written or electronic form, if patented technology (or technology under patent application) might be incorporated into a draft standard being developed within the IEEE Working Group. If you have questions, contact the IEEE Patent Committee Administrator at templates have changed Bruce Kraemer, Marvell Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

http://newton Register Indicate attendance Attendance
March 2007 Attendance Register Indicate attendance See document for more details Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

TGn Minutes of Jan ’07 07/0062r0 March 2007
Executive Summary (also see Chairs’ meeting doc r5 and closing report doc r0): The goal of the meeting was to resolve all 230 remaining comments and generate Draft 2.0 which would go to LB and complete before the start of the Plenary session in Orlando, March Going into the meeting the ad hocs had the following number of comments to resolve: PSMP-0, CA-0, General-5, Phy-3, Frame Format-24 (deferred), Coexistence-150 (138 related to 40/20 in 2.4 GHz), MAC-45, Beam Forming and Link Adaptation-3. Result – the goal was met as all comments were resolved in 30 motions. Motion to hold a 15day LB to approve Draft 2.0 and hold a 30 day LB on D 2.0 to complete before the March Plenary passed unanimously. No teleconferences or ad hoc meetings will be held between the Jan session and the March session due to the LB. Between the March and May sessions one ad hoc on April was tentatively planned at a location to be determined at the March session. A pre-May Interim ad hoc (May9-11) in Montreal was committed to. The official .11n timeline was pushed out 6 months and now shows the .11n amendment will be published October xxx Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

March 2007 Approve Minutes Motion to approve London, January ‘07 TGn minutes as contained in r0 Move: Second: Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

TGn Quick Review of Events prior to this meeting
March 2007 TGn Quick Review of Events prior to this meeting Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

March 2007 doc.: IEEE /0211r0 March 2007 One Page History of TGn HTSG formed – First meeting (Sep-11-’02 Monterey) TGn formed – First meeting (Sep-15-’03 Singapore) Began call for proposals (May 17 ’04 Garden Grove) 32 First round presentations (Sep 13 ’04 Berlin) Down selected to one proposal (Mar ’05 Atlanta) –first confirm vote failed Confirmation vote #2 failed - reset to 3 proposals -left the May ‘05 meeting with a serious deadlock. (Cairns) 3 proposal groups agreed to a joint proposal activity (Jul ’05 San Francisco) JP proposal accepted by vote of 184/0/4, editor instructed to create draft (Jan ’06 Waikoloa) Baseline specification converted into Draft 1.0 (335p). Letter ballot issued (LB84) March 20, ’06 (Denver) and closed on April 29, ‘06 (failed) Draft 1.0 Comment resolution begins (May ’06 Jacksonville) Approved 6711 editorial and 1041 technical resolutions; Created Draft (Jul ’06 San Diego) Approved 568 technical resolutions (Sep ’06 Melbourne); Created Draft 1.06 (388p) Approved 703 technical resolutions (Nov ’06 Dallas); Created Draft 1.09 (444p) Approved 496 technical resolutions (Jan ’07 London); created D (500p); went to WG letter ballot Feb 7, ’07 with D 2.0; closed March 9, ‘07 Bruce Kraemer, Marvell Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

11n - Overall timeline March 2007 HT SG Formed PAR Approved TGn Formed
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 HT SG Formed PAR Approved TGn Formed Publication REVCOM Approval First Sponsor Letter Ballot Selection Process & Criteria 2nd WG Letter Ballot Call for Proposals 1st WG Letter Ballot Proposal Presentations Confirmation Renewal required Down Select Joint proposal Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

Letter Ballot 95 Requesting Release of Draft 2.0
March 2007 Letter Ballot 95 Requesting Release of Draft 2.0 Official Results of IEEE WG Letter Ballot #95: Procedural Vote Closing date: 1. This ballot has met the 50% returned ballot requirement. 330 eligible people in this ballot group. 293 affirmative votes 6 negative votes 14 abstention votes ===== 313 votes received = 94.85% returned 4.47% abstention 2. The 75% affirmation requirement is being met. 293 affirmative votes 6 negative votes 299 votes = % affirmative - MOTION PASSES 2.01% disapprove Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

Letter Ballot 97 Requesting to move Draft 2.0 to Sponsor
March 2007 doc.: IEEE /0211r0 March 2007 Letter Ballot 97 Requesting to move Draft 2.0 to Sponsor Official Results of the recently closed IEEE WG Letter Ballot #97: Ballot Summary: Technical Vote Closing date: 1. This ballot has met the 50% returned ballot requirement. 325 eligible people in this ballot group. 231 affirmative votes 46 negative votes 28 abstention votes ===== 306 votes received = 94.2% returned % abstention 2. The 75% affirmation requirement is being met. 231 affirmative votes 46 negative votes 277 votes = 83.4% affirmative - MOTION PASSES 16.6% disapprove Bruce Kraemer, Marvell Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

Letter Ballot # 2.0 Comments
March 2007 Letter Ballot # 2.0 Comments 3163 Editorial & Technical Unique Duplicate 3076 87 Editorial Technical 1635 1441 Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

Draft 2.0 - Comment Distribution
March 2007 Draft Comment Distribution Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

TGn Ad Hoc Organization
March 2007 TGn Ad Hoc Organization Ad Hoc Topic LB 1.0 Ad hoc leader LB 2.0 Ad hoc leader PSMP Naveen Kakani CA Doc Sheung Li Frame Format Peter Loc PHY Jim Petranovich MAC Matt Fischer Coexistence Don Schultz Eldad Perahia Beamforming & Adaptation John Ketchum Joonsuk Kim General Jon Rosdahl Joe Levy Editorial Adrian Stephens Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

LB 2.0 - Ad Hoc Output Document Summary
March 2007 LB Ad Hoc Output Document Summary Ad Hoc Topic Ad hoc leader .xls res file # Mar pm Composite TG 00 MAC Matt Fischer Coexistence Eldad Perahia PHY Jim Petranovich Beamforming & Adaptation John Ketchum Joonsuk Kim TGn all Bruce Kraemer Frame Format Peter Loc Editorial Adrian Stephens PSMP Naveen Kakani General Joe Levy CA Doc Sheung Li xxx Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

March 2007 Orlando TGn Agenda Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

March 2007 (Orlando) WG Agenda (07/0075)
Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday am 1 am 2 pm 1 pm 2 eve Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

TGn – Mar ‘07 Schedule Mar 12 Mar 13 Mar 14 Mar 15 requested schedule
March 2007 doc.: IEEE /0211r0 March 2007 TGn – Mar ‘07 Schedule Mar 12 Mar 13 Mar 14 Mar 15 Time Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday am 1 8:00-10:00 X Ad hocs am 2 10:30-12:30 pm 1 13:30-15:30 pm 2 16:00-18:00 Full TGn eve 19:30-21:30 8-11 TGn ad hocs Xxx? requested schedule Bruce Kraemer, Marvell Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

TGn – Mar ‘07 Schedule requested schedule Mar 12 Mar 13 Mar 14 Mar 15
March 2007 requested schedule doc.: IEEE /0211r0 March 2007 TGn – Mar ‘07 Schedule Mar 12 Mar 13 Mar 14 Mar 15 Time Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday am 1 8:00-10:00 X Ad hocs am 2 10:30-12:30 pm 1 13:30-15:30 pm 2 16:00-18:00 Full TGn Full TGn Timeline Telecons eve 19:30-21:30 8-11 TGn ad hocs Bruce Kraemer, Marvell Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

TGn –Mar ‘07 Schedule Mar 12 Mar 13 Mar 14 Mar 15 X 10 16 4 18 6 12 2
March 2007 doc.: IEEE /0211r0 March 2007 TGn –Mar ‘07 Schedule Mar 12 Mar 13 Mar 14 Mar 15 Time Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday 8:00-10:00 X 10 16 10:30-12:30 4 WG Plenary 18 13:30-15:30 6 12 16:00-18:00 2 8 14 20 19:30-21:30 Social Prep for Friday 8-11 TGn ad hocs Carribean VI & VII am 1 am 2 802 Plenary pm 1 pm 2 eve Bruce Kraemer, Marvell Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

March 2007 TGn Room Assignments Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

TGn – Meeting Rooms Mar ‘07 Schedule
March 2007 doc.: IEEE /0211r0 March 2007 TGn – Meeting Rooms Mar ‘07 Schedule Mar 12 Mar 13 Mar 14 Mar 15 Time Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Fri 8:00-10:00 X 10 - ad hocs Grand Sierra D Curacao 5 & 6 Curacao 7 & 8 16 - ad hocs Grand Sierra D 10:30-12:30 4 - ad hocs Grand Sierra D 18 - ad hocs Grand Sierra D 13:30-15:30 6 - ad hocs Grand Sierra D 12 - ad hocs Grand Sierra D 16:00-18:00 2 - Full TGn Grand Sierra D 8 - ad hocs Grand Sierra D 14- ad hocs Grand Sierra D 20 - Full TGn Grand Sierra D 19:30-21:30 8-11 TGn ad hocs Caribbean VI & VII am 1 am 2 pm 1 pm 2 eve Bruce Kraemer, Marvell Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

TGn – Monday Mar 12 Schedule
March 2007 doc.: IEEE /0211r0 March 2007 TGn – Monday Mar 12 Schedule Time Monday Main Room TGN 1 Grand Sierra D TGN 2 Curacao 5 & 6 TGN 3 Curacao 7 & 8 8:00-11:00 TGn ad hoc Caribbean VI & VII Preparations 11:30-12:30 802 Plenary 13:30-15:30 WG Plenary 16:00-18:00 2 - Full TGn Opening report, minutes, agenda Technical editor report 19:30-21:30 X am 1 am 2 pm 1 pm 2 eve Bruce Kraemer, Marvell Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

TGn –Tuesday Mar 13 Schedule
March 2007 doc.: IEEE /0211r0 March 2007 TGn –Tuesday Mar 13 Schedule Time Tuesday Main Room TGN 1 Grand Sierra D TGN 2 Curacao 5 & 6 TGN 3 Curacao 7 & 8 8:00-10:00 X 10:30-12:30 4 - ad hocs PHY 13:30-15:30 6 - ad hocs MAC 16:00-18:00 8 - ad hocs Coex 19:30-21:30 am 1 am 2 pm 1 pm 2 eve Bruce Kraemer, Marvell Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

TGn –Wednesday Mar 14 Schedule
March 2007 doc.: IEEE /0211r0 March 2007 TGn –Wednesday Mar 14 Schedule Time Wednesday Main Room TGN 1 Grand Sierra D TGN 2 Curacao 5 & 6 TGN 3 Curacao 7 & 8 8:00-10:00 10 - ad hocs Beam General PSMP 10:30-12:30 X 13:30-15:30 12 - ad hocs Frame 16:00-18:00 14 - ad hocs PHY MAC 19:30-21:30 am 1 am 2 pm 1 pm 2 eve Bruce Kraemer, Marvell Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

TGn –Thursday Mar 15 Schedule
March 2007 doc.: IEEE /0211r0 March 2007 TGn –Thursday Mar 15 Schedule Time Thursday Main Room TGN 1 Grand Sierra D TGN 2 Curacao 5 & 6 TGN 3 Curacao 7 & 8 8:00-10:00 16 - ad hocs Coex PSMP General 10:30-12:30 18 - ad hocs Beam Frame 13:30-15:30 X 16:00-18:00 20 - Full TGn Plans now to May Teleconferences ad hoc events Time line 19:30-21:30 am 1 am 2 pm 1 pm 2 eve Bruce Kraemer, Marvell Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

March 2007 Approve Agenda Motion to approve March ’07 TGn agenda as contained on slide (with any minuted amendments). Move: Second: Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

Process Moving Forward
March 2007 Process Moving Forward Resolve comments received during WG LB97 on TGn Draft 2.0 Comments attached to yes and no votes See P & P slides Ad hoc leaders will summarize comments allocated by topic, suggest groupings, solicit submissions As before, .xls spreadsheets and submissions will be primary vehicles Technical Editor and ad hoc leaders will use new Access data base to collect information and generate .xls spreadsheets. Target release of Draft 3.0 for September ’07 (see schedule slide) Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

802.11 P&P (11-06-0812r3) 2.9.2 Draft Standard Balloting Requirements
March 2007 P&P ( r3) 2.9.2 Draft Standard Balloting Requirements For a WG letter ballot to be considered valid the abstention rate must be less than 30% as per the 802 LMSC Policies and Procedures. The WG is only obligated to consider comments that are received with ballots and other comments that are received by the close of the ballot. The ballot shall close at 23:59 USA Eastern Time (ET) on the date specified on the ballot. If the ballot has not achieved a 75% return by the specified closing date, the ballot may be extended to close when a 75% return of the balloting group is received. This extension for receipt of a 75% return shall not be longer than 60 days. Comments received after the close of balloting will be provided to the TG. The TG shall acknowledge the receipt of these comments to the initiator and take such action the TG deems appropriate. Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

802 Policies & Procedures 7.2.4.2.2 Voting by Letter Ballots
March 2007 802 Policies & Procedures Voting by Letter Ballots The decision to submit a draft standard or a revised standard to the Sponsor Ballot Group must be ratified by a letter ballot. Other matters may also be decided by a letter ballot at the discretion of the Working Group Chair. The Working Group Chair may vote in letter ballots. The ballot shall contain three choices: • Approve. (May attach non-binding comments.) • Do Not Approve. (Must attach specific comments on what must be done to the draft to change the vote to “Approve”.) • Abstain. (Must include reasons for abstention.) To forward a draft standard or a revised standard to the Executive Committee for approval for Sponsor Ballot Group voting, a letter ballot (or confirmation letter ballot) must be done first within the Working Group. A 75 percent approval of the Working Group confirmation letter ballot is necessary with at least 50 percent of the members voting. The 75 percent figure is computed only from the “Approve” and “Do Not Approve” votes. Subsequent confirmation ballots to the Sponsor Ballot Group do not require Executive Committee approval. The Working Group Chair determines if and how negative votes in an otherwise affirmative letter ballot are to be resolved. Normally, the Working Group meets to resolve the negatives or assigns the task to a ballot resolution group. Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

IEEE SA - Standards Companion
March 2007 IEEE SA - Standards Companion Above all, keep in mind that the goal is to achieve a75% approval rate in a timely manner. If the ballot objection raises a vital point that should be changed, make that change. If the ballot objection has merit but would severely reduce consensus, decide if there is any merit in making such a decision (in other words, is the loss of consensus worth the technical gain?). If the ballot objection would severely reduce consensus and offer only a minor change, then you should probably not make it. Good technical judgment should be exercised at all times when examining the ballot. Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

IEEE Standards Companion
March 2007 IEEE Standards Companion Affirmative votes with technical comments Since this is an affirmative vote, it is not necessary to accommodate formally or reply to such comments. However, you should consider incorporating them if they can be implemented without raising objections from other balloters. Such changes, if made, do constitute technical changes to the document and must be clearly identified in the required recirculation ballot draft. Affirmative votes with editorial comments Since this is an affirmative vote, it is not necessary to accommodate formally or reply to such comments. However, you should consider incorporating them if they can be implemented without raising objections from other balloters. Such changes, if made, do not constitute technical changes to the document and need not be recirculated. Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

Draft 3.0 Schedule Focus on 1635 Technical Comments
March 2007 Draft 3.0 Schedule Focus on 1635 Technical Comments Event March Orlando April – telecon only May ad hoc May interim July ad hoc July Plenary Sept ad hoc Sept interim Activity organize for submissions Prepare submissions Review subs for voting May interim July ad hoc July Plenary Sept ad hoc Sept interim Prepared 100 500 200 300 Voted in 700 300 Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

March 2007 End of Chair's Opening Report Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

Technical Editor’s Report 11-07-0305r0
March 2007 Technical Editor’s Report r0 Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

March 2007 Recess Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

TGn Opening Report Orlando, FL, US 802 Plenary – March ‘07

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "TGn Opening Report Orlando, FL, US 802 Plenary – March ‘07"— Presentation transcript:

Similar presentations

About project

Feedback

Log in

Auth with social network:

TGn Opening Report Orlando, FL, US 802 Plenary – March ‘07

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "TGn Opening Report Orlando, FL, US 802 Plenary – March ‘07"— Presentation transcript:

Similar presentations

About project

Feedback