Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
1
BEC 30325: MANAGERIAL ECONOMICS
Session 11 Market Structures Part III Dr. Sumudu Perera
2
Monopolistic Competition
Many sellers of differentiated (similar but not identical) products Limited monopoly power Downward-sloping demand curve Increase in market share by competitors causes decrease in demand for the firm’s product
3
Monopolistic Competition Short-Run Equilibrium
4
Monopolistic Competition Long-Run Equilibrium
Profit = 0
5
Monopolistic Competition Long-Run Equilibrium
Cost with selling expenses Cost without selling expenses
6
BEC 30325: MANAGERIAL ECONOMICS
Session 11 Game Theory and Strategic Behavior Dr. Sumudu Perera
7
Session Outline Strategic Behavior Prisoners’ Dilemma
Extensions of Game Theory Dr.Sumudu Perera 19/11/201819/11/2018
8
Strategic Behavior Decisions that take into account the predicted reactions of rival firms Interdependence of outcomes Game Theory Players Strategies Payoff matrix
9
Strategic Behavior Types of Games Nash Equilibrium Zero-sum games
Nonzero-sum games Nash Equilibrium Each player chooses a strategy that is optimal given the strategy of the other player A strategy is dominant if it is optimal regardless of what the other player does
10
Advertising Example 1
11
Advertising Example 1 What is the optimal strategy for Firm A if Firm B chooses to advertise?
12
Advertising Example 1 What is the optimal strategy for Firm A if Firm B chooses to advertise? If Firm A chooses to advertise, the payoff is 4. Otherwise, the payoff is 2. The optimal strategy is to advertise.
13
Advertising Example 1 What is the optimal strategy for Firm A if Firm B chooses not to advertise?
14
Advertising Example 1 What is the optimal strategy for Firm A if Firm B chooses not to advertise? If Firm A chooses to advertise, the payoff is 5. Otherwise, the payoff is 3. Again, the optimal strategy is to advertise.
15
Advertising Example 1 Regardless of what Firm B decides to do, the optimal strategy for Firm A is to advertise. The dominant strategy for Firm A is to advertise.
16
Advertising Example 1 What is the optimal strategy for Firm B if Firm A chooses to advertise?
17
Advertising Example 1 What is the optimal strategy for Firm B if Firm A chooses to advertise? If Firm B chooses to advertise, the payoff is 3. Otherwise, the payoff is 1. The optimal strategy is to advertise.
18
Advertising Example 1 What is the optimal strategy for Firm B if Firm A chooses not to advertise?
19
Advertising Example 1 What is the optimal strategy for Firm B if Firm A chooses not to advertise? If Firm B chooses to advertise, the payoff is 5. Otherwise, the payoff is 2. Again, the optimal strategy is to advertise.
20
Advertising Example 1 Regardless of what Firm A decides to do, the optimal strategy for Firm B is to advertise. The dominant strategy for Firm B is to advertise.
21
Advertising Example 1 The dominant strategy for Firm A is to advertise and the dominant strategy for Firm B is to advertise. The Nash equilibrium is for both firms to advertise.
22
Advertising Example 2
23
Advertising Example 2 What is the optimal strategy for Firm A if Firm B chooses to advertise?
24
Advertising Example 2 What is the optimal strategy for Firm A if Firm B chooses to advertise? If Firm A chooses to advertise, the payoff is 4. Otherwise, the payoff is 2. The optimal strategy is to advertise.
25
Advertising Example 2 What is the optimal strategy for Firm A if Firm B chooses not to advertise?
26
Advertising Example 2 What is the optimal strategy for Firm A if Firm B chooses not to advertise? If Firm A chooses to advertise, the payoff is 5. Otherwise, the payoff is 6. In this case, the optimal strategy is not to advertise.
27
Advertising Example 2 The optimal strategy for Firm A depends on which strategy is chosen by Firms B. Firm A does not have a dominant strategy.
28
Advertising Example 2 What is the optimal strategy for Firm B if Firm A chooses to advertise?
29
Advertising Example 2 What is the optimal strategy for Firm B if Firm A chooses to advertise? If Firm B chooses to advertise, the payoff is 3. Otherwise, the payoff is 1. The optimal strategy is to advertise.
30
Advertising Example 2 What is the optimal strategy for Firm B if Firm A chooses not to advertise?
31
Advertising Example 2 What is the optimal strategy for Firm B if Firm A chooses not to advertise? If Firm B chooses to advertise, the payoff is 5. Otherwise, the payoff is 2. Again, the optimal strategy is to advertise.
32
Advertising Example 2 Regardless of what Firm A decides to do, the optimal strategy for Firm B is to advertise. The dominant strategy for Firm B is to advertise.
33
Advertising Example 2 The dominant strategy for Firm B is to advertise. If Firm B chooses to advertise, then the optimal strategy for Firm A is to advertise. The Nash equilibrium is for both firms to advertise.
34
Prisoners’ Dilemma Two suspects are arrested for armed robbery. They are immediately separated. If convicted, they will get a term of 10 years in prison. However, the evidence is not sufficient to convict them of more than the crime of possessing stolen goods, which carries a sentence of only 1 year. The suspects are told the following: If you confess and your accomplice does not, you will go free. If you do not confess and your accomplice does, you will get 10 years in prison. If you both confess, you will both get 5 years in prison.
35
Payoff Matrix (negative values)
Prisoners’ Dilemma Payoff Matrix (negative values)
36
Dominant Strategy Both Individuals Confess
Prisoners’ Dilemma Dominant Strategy Both Individuals Confess (Nash Equilibrium)
37
Application: Price Competition
Prisoners’ Dilemma Application: Price Competition
38
Application: Price Competition Dominant Strategy: Low Price
Prisoners’ Dilemma Application: Price Competition Dominant Strategy: Low Price
39
Application: Nonprice Competition
Prisoners’ Dilemma Application: Nonprice Competition
40
Application: Nonprice Competition Dominant Strategy: Advertise
Prisoners’ Dilemma Application: Nonprice Competition Dominant Strategy: Advertise
41
Application: Cartel Cheating
Prisoners’ Dilemma Application: Cartel Cheating
42
Application: Cartel Cheating Dominant Strategy: Cheat
Prisoners’ Dilemma Application: Cartel Cheating Dominant Strategy: Cheat
43
Extensions of Game Theory
Repeated Games Many consecutive moves and countermoves by each player Tit-For-Tat Strategy Do to your opponent what your opponent has just done to you
44
Extensions of Game Theory
Tit-For-Tat Strategy Stable set of players Small number of players Easy detection of cheating Stable demand and cost conditions Game repeated a large and uncertain number of times
45
Extensions of Game Theory
Threat Strategies Credibility Reputation Commitment Example: Entry deterrence
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.