Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Upper Gallatin Drought/Water Supply Focus Group

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Upper Gallatin Drought/Water Supply Focus Group"— Presentation transcript:

1 Upper Gallatin Drought/Water Supply Focus Group
Meeting Topic: Vulnerability Assessment April 27 10:30-12PM Big Sky Water & Sewer District Conference Room

2

3 What is a Vulnerability Assessment?
A tool we can use to organize our thoughts to: 1. Identify impacts 2. Prioritize our watershed’s risk to drought/water supply issues Answers these questions: Where are we most vulnerable? What will happen if we run out of water? Goal: Use assessment information to develop strategies that improve resiliency and reduce drought risk (long and short term) Graphic taken from Drought Resilient Communities webinar training Spring 2016 -Presentation developed by NIDIS (National Integrated Drought Information System) and NDMC staff Core element to drought management planning

4 Vulnerability Assessment Examples
Example: Zunni Nation Water Use & Drought Risk Matrix Table Examples taken from Drought Resilient Communities Webinar Training Series (Spring 2016) Other examples: brainstorming sessions/collaborative discussion, literature reviews, scenario building, gis modeling, proxy indicators

5 SNAPP Framework Way to conceptualize drought in an ecological sense, connects ecological impacts to human communities How we interact with our environment Resource use and management Physical attributes, climate info Water demand, land use, local policies SNAPP: A partnership among National Center Ecological Analysis and Synthesis, The Nature Conservancy, Wildlife Conservation Society, USGS Science for Nature And People Partnership

6 SNAPP Fr amewo r k

7 SNAPP Fr amewo r k This is what we are working towards

8 SNAPP Framework Meteorological Drought
Source: Emily Casey Roundtable Discussion Presentation Palmer Drought Severity Index: SW MT in severe or extreme drought % of the time since 1895 600 Years of Snowpack History: prolonged and severe drought in the area is chronic

9 SNAPP Framework EXPOSURE Upper Gallatin Landscape Characteristics
Topography: ft Geography: Alpine valleys draining into Gallatin Canyon Annual Precipitation: 19” in lower elevations to 61” in higher Soils: Higher permeability in higher elevations, Lower elevation soils = low to moderate permeability and susceptibility to erosion Geology: Gallatin range: Volcanic rocks Meadow: Alluvial & glacial deposits Lone Mountain: Igneous intrusion of dacite porphyry (erosion resistant) Surface Water: Peak flows can occur early May to late July, average annual peak = 3000 cfs, average annual lows occur in February at 300 cfs Groundwater: Shallow alluvial (most used for PWS) and bedrock aquifers Landscape Characteristics Source: GRTF’s 2012 WRP p 5-6

10 SNAPP Framework SENSITIVITY/ADAPTIVE CAPACITY Upper Gallatin Ecological Characteristics Vegetation: Coniferous forest, grasslands, shrublands, willow and aspen groves in riparian areas Wildlife: Black and grizzly bear, elk, bighorn sheep, mountain goat, mule and white-tailed deer, moose, bald eagles, peregrine falcon, osprey, magpie, fox, gray wolf, mountain lion, wolverine, pika Aquatic life Native: Westslope cutthroat trout, mountain whitefish, longnose dace, longnose sucker, mountain sucker, white sucker, mottled sculpin Introduced: Brook, brown, golden, rainbow trout Invasive: Didymo (rock snot) Ecological Characteristics Source: GRTF 2012 WRP, pg 7

11 SNAPP Framework EXPOSURE Montana’s Anthropogenic Climate Change
Montana Water Trends & Projections Between : Snowpack has declined, especially since 1980s Earlier spring runoff Streamflow is influenced by warming & climate variability (ex. El Nino) Future Snowpack will continue to decline, with earlier snowmelt Streamflow may increase, especially in spring/early summer Late-summer water availability will decrease Droughts will be exacerbated by warming Demands for groundwater will increase Anthropogenic Climate Change Source: Brad Bauer Climate 101 Presentation, MT Climate Assessment

12 SNAPP Framework EXPOSURE Upper Gallatin Land Use
Westfork Watershed Land Ownership Map: GRTF WRP 2012: majority of Big Sky area is privately owned Bullets: from 2011 Capital Improvement Plan for Big Sky/ Gallatin Canyon

13 SNAPP Framework EXPOSURE Water Use Water & Sewer District
Provides service to 4385 SFE in Meadow & Mtn Village Average use: 200 gpd/SFE, in summer Need to increase to 9000 SFE in ~2044 (build out) Water Rights: 3495 gpm, AF in Meadow & Mtn Source: Groundwater, most dense service provided by Meadow Village aquifer via 12 PWS wells Private/Smaller Systems: YC, Spanish Peaks, Moonlight, Ramshorn, Firelights Source: Groundwater 840 Private wells in Big Sky/Gallatin Canyon Demographics Population year round residents, as many as visitors on peak winter/summer days Growth rate: 2.4% Build out estimated by 2044 About 3561 jobs, tourism and recreation based economy most jobs in lodging, services, and retail/commercial Biggest employers: Big Sky Resort, YC -bulk of employees commute from Bozeman area Water Use -water and sewer data from Source Capacity Plan (2015) executive summary, water rights -gwic database Demographics -Ron Edwards, source capacity plan update -2011 capital improvement plan for Big Sky/Gallatin Canyon

14 SNAPP Framework SENSITIVITY/ADAPTIVE CAPACITY
Upper Gallatin Natural Resources Management View BSSWSF ecological health of the river page for full list Forests Custer-Gallatin Forest Plan, Gallatin Community Wildfire Protection Plan River Gallatin River Task Force mission & projects serve to protect the Upper Gallatin Watershed Restoration & conservation projects Long term monitoring, continuous monitoring sites AIS Clean Drain Dry Educational Campaign Wild & Scenic Initiative on Gallatin, Taylor Fork, & Porcupine Groundwater MBMG Groundwater Study Riparian Areas Westfork streambank restoration projects Wetlands Future mapping projects Open Space BSCO trails Conservation easements BSSWSF ecological health of the river resources

15 SNAPP Fr amewo r k

16 Impacts Review: Ecological
Drought Impact Reports by County Common Drought Impacts Reduced snowpack levels Low streamflows Stress on fisheries and wildlife Loss of viable habitat Increased wildfire duration, area burned, and intensity Increased invasive species Fishing restrictions Poor water quality Public health risks from air quality Reduced quality of recreational opportunities Most mentioned impact from Information Sharing meeting: Wildfire 1988 Yellowstone Fires Late 90s & Early 2000s Also: Fishing bans, evacuation notices (livestock and residents), restrictions on highway turnout use

17 Impacts: Ecosystem Services
Impact of Climate Change on MT Outdoor Economy (2015) Big Sky’s economy is based on tourism and recreation Virtually all businesses are impacted by our natural resources Snowpack and streamflows 2016 Yellowstone visitors contributed $680.4 million to the Park’s gateway communities in MT and WY (April 2017 Bozeman Daily Chronicle Article) ITRR: Institute of Tourism and Recreation Research Overall 26% decline in job opportunities Overall 26% loss in labor earnings lost to MT employees -->42,000 people employed by tourism industry

18 Drought Awareness Survey: 50 responses from local community
“Drought can impact not only obvious recreational opportunities such as fishing, rafting, and golf, but also less obvious ones such as mountain biking, hiking, and horseback riding. It can be a huge impact on overall forest health. I am very concerned.” “I am concerned that the area will not be prepared, especially if we have unusually long drought periods.” “It’s water that makes our world go around up here, it affects everything!”

19 Additional Vulnerability Information
Gallatin County Emergency Management Plan Drought risk: Overall Moderate risk Moderate probability of major disaster Moderate probability of property impact Low probability of population impact High probability of economic impact Moderate future development impact Madison County Emergency Management Plan Drought Risk: Overall Moderate-High Risk Up to D4 Magnitude Economic impacts Weeks-months County-wide Highest risk areas: Rural, ag areas Potential size: Valley to county-wide Speed of onset: Weeks to months Duration: Months to years Priority: Moderate


Download ppt "Upper Gallatin Drought/Water Supply Focus Group"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google