Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byEleanore Lindsey Modified over 6 years ago
1
National Park Service Balancing Bonneville Cutthroat Trout with Non-native Salmonids in Great Basin National Park Gretchen M. Baker, Neal W. Darby, Tod B. Williams
2
Great Basin National Park
10 perennial streams 6 streams in Bonneville cutthroat trout (BCT) habitat
3
BCT Background Lake Bonneville BCT Declines Highest extent Desiccation
Non-native fish Logging Grazing Great Basin National Park
4
1999 Park Fisheries Management Plan
Two-pronged approach Balancing management BCT Restoration Recreational Fishing 1999 Park Fisheries Management Plan Objectives
5
2000 BCT Rangewide Conservation Agreement
Planning 2000 BCT Rangewide Conservation Agreement Signed by states of Utah, Wyoming, Idaho, Nevada US Fish and Wildlife Service, Bureau of Land Management, National Park Service US Forest Service Utah Reclamation Mitigation and Conservation Commission Support from Trout Unlimited and others
6
Methods-BCT Reintroduction
BCT Reintroduction Steps Baseline surveys Pre-treatment surveys Treatment Post-treatment effectiveness monitoring BCT reintroduction Post-reintroduction effectiveness monitoring
7
Fishing Streams Strawberry— BCT 2002
BCT Stream Other Fish Strawberry— BCT 2002 Mill Creek—remnant BCT population found South Fork Baker—BCT 2005 Upper Snake Creek—BCT 2004 South Fork Big Wash—BCT 2000 Big Wash—BCT 2003 Pine & Ridge Creeks—pure BCT
8
Methods-Recreational Fishing
Monitoring Volunteer recruitment Inclusion in park planning
9
Results-BCT BCT in 17 miles of streams Good recruitment
Increase in size
10
South Fork Big Wash--2000
11
South Fork Big Wash--2002
12
South Fork Big Wash--2004
13
Results-BCT Strawberry Creek- 55% increase in BCT from 2003 to 2004
Macroinvertebrate recovery
14
Results-Recreational Fishing
Perception of no fish due to lack of stocking
15
Baker Population Surveys
Population increasing Brown trout decreasing in size Brook and rainbow trout increasing slightly Year Fish/mile Method 2003 2527 3 pass, 100 m 1990 750* 1 pass, 500 ft *1088/mile including recorded misses
16
Lehman Population Surveys
Population increasing Size of fish fluctuating Caught 9/2/04 340 mm (13 in) Year Fish/mile Method 2004 2157 3 pass, 100 m 2003 2528 1990 449* 1 pass, 600 ft 1984** 1109^ 1 pass, 100 ft 1952 163 not specified *774 fish/mile including recorded misses ** Pop survey done 17 days after a plant of 749 fish; 41% of fish caught were planted based on fin wear characteristics; ^1373 fish/mile including recorded misses
17
Comparing BCT to non-natives
BCT density greater than other species
18
Results-Publicity Brochure Interviews Articles
19
Other results Volunteers Thinning Park planning Fire rehab
20
Discussion Successful park project Politics Adaptive Management
Timetable
21
The Future Monitor non-native populations
Monitor/manage BCT populations 5-10 years, BCT sustainable fishery within park
22
Acknowledgements National Park Service Nevada Department of Wildlife
US Forest Service BLM Trout Unlimited
23
Macroinvertebrate Recovery
Decline of macroinvertebrate abundance one month following the antimycin treatment on Snake Creek and the rotenone treatment on Strawberry Creek.
24
Macroinvertebrate Recovery
Decline of macroinvertebrate taxa one month following the antimycin treatment on Snake Creek and the rotenone treatment on Strawberry Creek.
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.