Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Vanderbilt University Honors 182: Neuroethics

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Vanderbilt University Honors 182: Neuroethics"— Presentation transcript:

1 Vanderbilt University Honors 182: Neuroethics
I Cannot Tell a Lie: The Biological Basis of the Excited Utterance Exception to the Hearsay Rule Michael Vandenbergh David Chooljian Vanderbilt University School of Law April 6, 2006

2 What is the hearsay rule?
Key Questions What is the hearsay rule? What is the excited utterance exception? Why do we have these rules? Does our understanding of the brain provide support for the excited utterance exception? Does it suggest modifications to the excited utterance exception? Can law help frame questions for biological research? 2

3 The Problem: Reliability of
The Hearsay Problem The Problem: Reliability of Testimony The Legal Solution: Cross- Examination The Next Problem: Hearsay Cross Examination: Witness v. Declarant 3

4 Federal Rules of Evidence 801, 802
The Hearsay Rule Federal Rules of Evidence 801, 802 Out of court statement By someone other than the witness Offered for the truth of the proposition Example: “that has been on the floor several hours” 4

5 The Excited Utterance Exception
Federal Rule of Evidence 803(2) Utterance admissible: If declarant experiences a startling event or condition; and If declarant makes a statement while under the stress of excitement caused by the condition 5

6 The Excited Utterance Exception
Unavailability of the declarant not required. Tesimony that declarant was distraught and that there was a basis for the distress often sufficient to establish that the statement was made in a state of excitement. 6

7 The Excited Utterance Exception
Courts vary on the length of the temporal gap that may occur between the event and the statement (“duration of the state of excitement”). Declarant’s increased trustworthiness is a surrogate for cross-examination. Wigmore on Evidence § 1747 (1904): “a condition of excitement which temporarily stills the capacity of reflection and produces utterances free of conscious fabrication.” 7

8 The Neurophysiology of Excited Utterances: Key Questions
Is it physically impossible to lie when making an excited utterance? If not impossible, is it more difficult? Any utterance or only wordless exclamations? What is the maximum time interval? What is the necessary extent of excitement? Do certain events “still the mind” more than others? 8

9 The Neurophysiology of Excited Utterances: Overview
ACG Preconscious Utterance Laugh, Cry, Scream t = ms Normal Utterance t is variable; ms min. Deceptive Utterance 100ms < t < 3s fMRI limits 9

10 Implications, Part I Is it physically impossible to lie when making an excited utterance? Any utterance or only wordless exclamations? What is the maximum time interval? What is the necessary extent of excitement? 10

11 Implications, Part II Broader Questions
Does biological research offer insights for other rules of evidence (e.g., exception for present sense impressions)? When can law frame questions for biological research? When can the results of biological research influence legal doctrines? Should law reflect the product of biological research? 11


Download ppt "Vanderbilt University Honors 182: Neuroethics"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google