Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Can micro channeling improve the TOTEM experiment

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Can micro channeling improve the TOTEM experiment"— Presentation transcript:

1 Can micro channeling improve the TOTEM experiment
Suggestions by V. Avati and K. Eggert Idea: Crystal placed at 6 s from the LHC beam, deflecting the protons, can improve considerably the proton acceptance of the TOTEM Roman pots Principle lay-out Physics example: Higgs search in central diffraction Crystal Collimation in Hadron Storage Rings, CERN 7-8 March 2005

2 TOTEM ROMAN POT IN CERN SPS BEAM

3 ROMAN POT DETECTORS and ELECTRONICS
TOTEM APV hybrid Flexible connections (In production) beam Readout chip VFAT detector Pitch adapter on detector Test card for VFAT

4 Detector Distance vs. Beam
Detector distance vs. beam is determined by the beam halo. nσ-reach? (RA LHC MAC 13/3/03) ns = dmin/sx,y(z)  10-15 Expected halo rate: 6kHz (for 43 bunches, Np = 1010, eN = 1mm, ns = 10) Active detector starts at the distance d from the physical edge Closest approach : ns = 10 d = 200mm

5 Elastic Scattering b* = 1540 m acceptance

6 Double Pomeron Exchange:
Example Processes Single Diffraction: X p1 ds/dh proton:p2’ MX2 = x s diffractive system X rapidity gap P Dh =–ln p2’ hmin hmax p2 ln(2pL/pT) Measure leading proton ( x) and rapidity gap ( test gap survival). Double Pomeron Exchange: p1 p2 p2’ p1’ P diffractive system X proton:p2’ proton:p1’ rapidity gap hmin hmax X MX2 = x1 x2 s P Dh2=– ln x2 Dh1=– ln x1 Measure leading protons ( x1, x2) and compare with MX, Dh1, Dh2

7 Diffractive Higgs Production
-jet H gap h p (1-x2)p (1-x1)p MH2 = x1x2 s beam p’ roman pots dipole

8 Roman Pots in the forward regions
y(mm) x(mm) 220m y(mm) x(mm) 420m Dispersion D = 0.08 m D=1.5m x Leading diffractive protons seen at different detector locations (b* = 0.5m)

9 6 x beam profile with crystal extraction
RP stations 6 x beam profile with crystal extraction RP stations Crystal extraction

10 Hit distribution in the RP detector
protons deflected by the crystal the other protons in RP X [m] Y [m] 10 s beam profile Detector edge

11 Angular distribution in the detector
 = 15rad Bent by the crystal (by 0.5 mrad) rad

12 -acceptance for a Higgs with MH=120 GeV/c2
In Totem acceptance (68% of 1) With cristal extraction 2<1 Totem acceptance with cristal extraction (87% of 1)

13 Conclusions Crystal extraction is promising to approach the LHC beams closer than with standard RP detectors Larger acceptance for diffractively produced Higgs Same method could be used for elastic scattered protons to reach the Coulomb region Needs extensive tests with crystals and Roman Pots in the SPS (see talk of Marco Oriunno)


Download ppt "Can micro channeling improve the TOTEM experiment"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google