1. Menu Analysis & Engineering
HRT383

2. References
Mill, Robert Christie (1998) Restaurant Management: Customers, operations, and employees / Menu Scoring & Menu Engineering, pp Upper Saddle River, N.J. : Prentice Hall.
Drysdale, John A. & Jennifer Adams Aldrich (2002). Profitable menu planning / Chapter 5: Menu Analysis, pp rd ed. Upper Saddle River, N.J. : Prentice Hall, TX911.3.M45 D  
CD-ROM TX911.3.M45 D  
11/20/2018
HRT383

3. Objectives
By the completion of this presentation you should be able to:
Analyze a menu for profitability
Apply menu engineering to menu analysis
Price menu items
Locate menu items on a menu.
11/20/2018
HRT383

4. Important Terms Menu engineering Menu Plowhorses Puzzles Stars Dogs
Placement
Pricing
11/20/2018
HRT383

5. Introduction This presentation explains how to evaluate a menu
When measuring a menu to see if it is successful 2 criteria must be met to declare it a winner:
Must be profitable in terms of individual item profitability
Most profitable item must be selling the best.
For evaluating menus, several systems are available. Two of the most widely used methods will be presented here.
11/20/2018
HRT383

6. Stars, Plowhorses, Puzzles, & Dogs
Method, called menu engineering, developed by Donald Smith Ph.D., Westin Hotels Distinguished Professor at Washington State University
This method rates the menu by measuring each entrée as to its profitability (gross profit) and its sales. It then combines these measurements and places each menu item into one of four classifications.
Puzzle
Plow
Horse
Star
Dog
11/20/2018
HRT383

7. Selling Price – Food Cost = Contributing Margin
Determine the contributing margin (CM) of each item
CM same as item’s Gross Profit
Use total food cost (include garnish, accompaniments served with entrée such as salad, potatoes, rolls, butter etc.).
Selling Price – Food Cost = Contributing Margin
One point to understand before delving into menu engineering is the theory of contributing margins.
11/20/2018
HRT383

8. Contribution Margin Dollars vs. Food Cost Percentage
Sirloin
Pasta
Coffee
Selling Price
$22.00
$18.00
$2.00
Cost
$10.36
$4.54
$0.19
Food Cost %
47.09%
25.22%
9.5%
Cont. Margin $
$11.64
$13.46
$1.81
Note:
Relationship between food cost % and contribution margin in $ is not consistent.
An item that has a high contribution margin in $ does not necessarily have a low food cost %.
Too often, management is led to believe that low food cost % are the primary objective.
Not so, you can’t take % to the bank, you take money.
11/20/2018
HRT383

9. Contribution Margin Dollars vs. Food Cost Percentage
Sirloin
Pasta
Coffee
Selling Price
$22.00
$18.00
$2.00
Cost
$10.36
$4.54
$0.19
Food Cost %
47.09%
25.22%
9.5%
Cont. Margin $
$11.64
$13.46
$1.81
Note:
Relationship between food cost % and contribution margin in $ is not consistent.
An item that has a high contribution margin in $ does not necessarily have a low food cost %.
Too often, management is led to believe that low food cost % are the primary objective.
Not so, you can’t take % to the bank, you take money.
11/20/2018
HRT383

10. Data Trap Fall ‘07
See Lunch Hand Out
11/20/2018
HRT383

11. Desserts MENU ITEM RKR Apple Crisp Panna Cotta Sampler
Menu
Plate
Contribution
Quantity
Net
Total
MENU ITEM
Price
Cost %
Margin
Sold
Income
RKR Apple Crisp
4.00
0.80
20.00%
3.20
213
852.00
170.40
Panna Cotta
1.64
41.00%
2.36 9
36.00
14.76
Sampler
1.69
42.25%
2.31 41
164.00
69.29
Manager Dessert $
1.61
40.25%
2.39
640
TOTAL DESSERTS
20%
 2.58
922
11/20/2018
HRT383

12. Popularity Average Popularity
80% of the average item sales per Dessert:
100 / 4 X 80% = 20%
11/20/2018
HRT383

13. Popularity MENU ITEM RKR Apple Crisp Sampler Cheesecake Seasonal Fruit
Menu
Plate
Contribution
Quantity
Net
Total
Popularity
MENU ITEM
Price
Cost %
Margin
Sold
Income
Engineering
RKR Apple Crisp
5.00
0.82
16.40%
4.18 58
290.00
47.56
11.79%
Sampler
1.71
34.20%
3.29 30
150.00
51.30
6.10%
Cheesecake
0.94
18.80%
4.06 11
55.00
10.34
2.24%
Seasonal Fruit
1.12
22.40%
3.88 1
0.20%
Manager Dessert $
1.61
32.20%
3.39
392
631.12
79.67%
TOTAL DESSERTS
30.14%
$3.49
492
741.44
20%
11/20/2018
HRT383

14. HRT383 Lunch Desserts 100% Plowhorse Star Dog Puzzle Popularity 20%
In the example; CHICKEN would be dropped from the menu, while the FILET would be promoted more heavily. The prices on the BEEF and the TURKEY might be raised a little and featured more visibly on the menu.
20%
11/20/2018
Contribution Margin $2.58
HRT383

15. HRT383 Lunch Desserts 100% Plowhorse * Manager Special $2.39/70.87%
Star
* Apple Crisp
$3.20/23.59%
* Sampler $2.31/4.54%
Dog * Panna Cotta $2.36/1.0%
Puzzle
Popularity
In the example; CHICKEN would be dropped from the menu, while the FILET would be promoted more heavily. The prices on the BEEF and the TURKEY might be raised a little and featured more visibly on the menu.
20%
11/20/2018
Contribution Margin $2.58
HRT383

16. Menu Engineering MENU ITEM RKR Apple Crisp Panna Cotta Sampler
Menu
Plate
Contribution
Quantity
Net
Total
Popularity
MENU ITEM
Price
Cost %
Margin
Sold
Income
Engineering
RKR Apple Crisp
4.00
0.80
20.00%
3.20
213
852.00
170.40
23.59%
STAR 
Panna Cotta
1.64
41.00%
2.36 9
36.00
14.76
1.00%
DOG 
Sampler
1.69
42.25%
2.31 41
164.00
69.29
4.54%
Manager Dessert $
1.61
40.25%
2.39
640
70.87%
Plow Horse 
TOTAL DESSERTS
35.57%
2.58
903
20%
11/20/2018
HRT383

17. The Four Key Menu Categories
Plowhorses are items that are relatively popular but have a high contribution margin. Items in this category can have their menu prices increased or the portion size cut in a attempt to increase CM. If market is price resistant
Stars have both high popularity and high CM
Puzzles have relatively low popularity and high margins; lower price.
Dogs are both low in popularity and CM; eliminate
Plowhorses
If the market does not resist the price increase, this action will move a plowhorse into the star category.
If market is price resistant, the item can be buried in a inconspicuous place on the menu in the knowledge that people will find these relative bargains anyway.
Stars
It may be possible to increase menu price and/or cut portion size to increase profits while maintaining volume
Puzzles
They need to be promoted more to stimulate sales.
Dogs
Prime candidates to be dropped from the menu.
In the example; CHICKEN would be dropped from the menu, while the FILET would be promoted more heavily. The prices on the BEEF and the TURKEY might be raised a little and featured more visibly on the menu.
11/20/2018
HRT383

18. HRT383 Lunch Desserts Eliminate? 100% Plowhorse * Manager Special
$2.39/70.87%
Star
* Apple Crisp
$3.20/23.59%
* Sampler $2.31/4.54%
Dog * Panna Cotta $2.36/1.0%
Puzzle
Increase $
Cut Portion ?
Popularity
In the example; CHICKEN would be dropped from the menu, while the FILET would be promoted more heavily. The prices on the BEEF and the TURKEY might be raised a little and featured more visibly on the menu.
20%
Eliminate?
11/20/2018
Contribution Margin $2.58
HRT383

19. Data Trap Spring ‘07 See Lunch Hand Out for Main Courses 11/20/2018
HRT383

20. Main Courses 5.30 11/20/2018 HRT383 Menu Plate Quantity Net Total
Menu
Plate
Contribution
Quantity
Net
Total
Popularity
MENU ITEM
Price
Cost %
Margin
Sold
Income
Engineering
Caesar Salad
8.00
1.34
16.75%
6.66 8
64.00
10.72
0.61%
3.41%
Caesar Salad with Chicken
9.00
2.80
31.11%
6.20 18
162.00
50.40
1.36%
Puzzle 
Caesar Salad with Shrimp
3.90
43.33%
5.10 19
171.00
74.10
1.44%
Cobb Salad
2.91
32.33%
6.09 54
486.00
157.14
4.09%
Puzzle
Southwestern Salad
2.72
30.22%
6.28 69
621.00
187.68
5.22%
Cheese Quesadilla
6.00
3.12
52.00%
2.88
324.00
168.48
9.01%
Quesadilla with Chicken
7.00
4.58
65.43%
2.42 40
280.00
183.20
3.03%
Plow Horse
Quesadilla with Shrimp
4.87
69.57%
2.13 25
175.00
121.75
1.89%
Turkcado
30.25%
5.58 88
704.00
212.96
6.66%
Plow Horse 
Burger
1.82
22.75%
6.18
104
832.00
189.28
7.87%
8.32%
Cheese Burger
8.50
2.08
24.47%
6.42 6
51.00
12.48
0.45%
 Puzzle
Salmon
12.00
5.29
44.08%
6.71
148
782.92
11.20%
 Plow Horse
Rib Eye Steak
11.83
98.58%
0.17 86
6.51%
Ravioli
1.78
22.25%
6.22 77
616.00
137.06
5.83%
STAR 
Manager Special Entrée
8.95
3.22
35.98%
5.73
525
39.74%
SUBTOTAL MAIN DISHES
41.66%
5.30
1321 5%
11/20/2018
HRT383

21. Exercise
Please work with your fellow students and come up with suggestions/decisions.
11/20/2018
HRT383

22. HRT383 Lunch Main Courses 100% Plowhorse Star Dog Puzzle Popularity
In the example; CHICKEN would be dropped from the menu, while the FILET would be promoted more heavily. The prices on the BEEF and the TURKEY might be raised a little and featured more visibly on the menu.
5.33%
11/20/2018
Contribution Margin $4.88
HRT383

23. Main Courses 11/20/2018 HRT383 Menu Plate Quantity Net Total
Menu
Plate
Contribution
Quantity
Net
Total
Popularity
MENU ITEM
Price
Cost %
Margin
Sold
Income
Engineering
Caesar Salad
8.00
1.34
16.75%
6.66 8
64.00
10.72
0.61%
3.41%
Caesar Salad with Chicken
9.00
2.80
31.11%
6.20 18
162.00
50.40
1.36%
Caesar Salad with Shrimp
3.90
43.33%
5.10 19
171.00
74.10
1.44%
Cobb Salad
2.91
32.33%
6.09 54
486.00
157.14
4.09%
Southwestern Salad
2.72
30.22%
6.28 69
621.00
187.68
5.22%
Cheese Quesadilla
6.00
3.12
52.00%
2.88
324.00
168.48
9.01%
Quesadilla with Chicken
7.00
4.58
65.43%
2.42 40
280.00
183.20
3.03%
Quesadilla with Shrimp
4.87
69.57%
2.13 25
175.00
121.75
1.89%
Turkcado
30.25%
5.58 88
704.00
212.96
6.66%
Burger
1.82
22.75%
6.18
104
832.00
189.28
7.87%
8.32%
Cheese Burger
8.50
2.08
24.47%
6.42 6
51.00
12.48
0.45%
Salmon
12.00
5.29
44.08%
6.71
148
782.92
11.20%
Rib Eye Steak
11.83
98.58%
0.17 86
6.51%
Ravioli
1.78
22.25%
6.22 77
616.00
137.06
5.83%
Manager Special Entrée
8.95
3.22
35.98%
5.73
525
39.74%
SUBTOTAL MAIN DISHES
41.66%
5.30
1321 5%
11/20/2018
HRT383

24. Main Courses 11/20/2018 HRT383 Menu Plate Quantity Net Total
Menu
Plate
Contribution
Quantity
Net
Total
Popularity
MENU ITEM
Price
Cost %
Margin
Sold
Income
Engineering
Caesar Salad
8.00
1.34
16.75%
6.66 8
64.00
10.72
0.61%
3.41%
Caesar Salad with Chicken
9.00
2.80
31.11%
6.20 18
162.00
50.40
1.36%
PUZZLE 
Caesar Salad with Shrimp
3.90
43.33%
5.10 19
171.00
74.10
1.44%
Cobb Salad
2.91
32.33%
6.09 54
486.00
157.14
4.09%
PUZZLE
Southwestern Salad
2.72
30.22%
6.28 69
621.00
187.68
5.22%
Cheese Quesadilla
6.00
3.12
52.00%
2.88
324.00
168.48
9.01%
Quesadilla with Chicken
7.00
4.58
65.43%
2.42 40
280.00
183.20
3.03%
Plow Horse
Quesadilla with Shrimp
4.87
69.57%
2.13 25
175.00
121.75
1.89%
Turkcado
30.25%
5.58 88
704.00
212.96
6.66%
STAR
Burger
1.82
22.75%
6.18
104
832.00
189.28
7.87%
8.32%
Cheese Burger
8.50
2.08
24.47%
6.42 6
51.00
12.48
0.45%
 PUZZLE
Salmon
12.00
5.29
44.08%
6.71
148
782.92
11.20%
Rib Eye Steak
11.83
98.58%
0.17 86
6.51%
Plow Horse 
Ravioli
1.78
22.25%
6.22 77
616.00
137.06
5.83%
STAR 
Manager Special Entrée
8.95
3.22
35.98%
5.73
525
39.74%
SUBTOTAL MAIN DISHES
41.66%
5.30
1321 5%
11/20/2018
HRT383

25. The Four Key Menu Categories
Plowhorses are items that are relatively popular but have a high contribution margin. Items in this category can have their menu prices increased or the portion size cut in a attempt to increase CM. If market is price resistant
Stars have both high popularity and high CM
Puzzles have relatively low popularity and high margins; lower price.
Dogs are both low in popularity and CM; eliminate
Plowhorses
If the market does not resist the price increase, this action will move a plowhorse into the star category.
If market is price resistant, the item can be buried in a inconspicuous place on the menu in the knowledge that people will find these relative bargains anyway.
Stars
It may be possible to increase menu price and/or cut portion size to increase profits while maintaining volume
Puzzles
They need to be promoted more to stimulate sales.
Dogs
Prime candidates to be dropped from the menu.
In the example; CHICKEN would be dropped from the menu, while the FILET would be promoted more heavily. The prices on the BEEF and the TURKEY might be raised a little and featured more visibly on the menu.
11/20/2018
HRT383

26. Up Selling
Manager’s Special
11/20/2018
HRT383

27. Placement Two Schools of thought Menu Sequence Focal Points
Menu should follow progression of meal
Focal Points
Use focal points on the menu to push certain menu items
11/20/2018
HRT383

28. Focal Points Focal Point Single Sheet Menu Twofold Menu 11/20/2018
HRT383

29. Focal Points 2 3 4 5
Focal Point
Threefold Menu
11/20/2018
HRT383

30. Specials Larger Bolder type than the rest of menu Longer description
Concept of Closure
people’s eyes are drawn to what ever is enclosed by a box
Color, illustration, and/or pictures, bullets can be used to draw attention to signature items.
11/20/2018
HRT383

31. Branding
Fast food
Coke / Pepsi
TGIF
Jack Daniels
11/20/2018
HRT383

32. Menu Pricing Odd-Cents pricing Price rounding. Placement
Majority of prices end in either a “5” or a “9”
Price rounding.
Within certain price bands, price increases have little negative impact on customers
Placement
11/20/2018
HRT383

33. Price Placement BAKED CHICKEN Tender pieces of chicken breast $8.99
LEMON SOLE
Fresh filets sautéed with lemon caper sauce
$11.99
LAMB STEAK
Center cut of lamb served on a bed of rice
$12.99
SWORDFISH STEAK
Charcoal grilled served with beurre blanc $14.99
Baked Chicken……….$8.99
Lemon Sole………….$11.99
Lamb Steak………….$12.99
Swordfish Steak…..…$14.99
11/20/2018
HRT383

34. Price Placement BAKED CHICKEN Tender pieces of chicken breast
Eight dollars and ninety nine cents
LEMON SOLE
Fresh filets sautéed with lemon caper sauce
Eleven dollars and ninety nine cents
LAMB STEAK
Center cut of lamb served on a bed of rice
Twelve dollars and ninety nine cents
SWORDFISH STEAK
Charcoal grilled served with beurre blanc Fourteen dollars and ninety nine cents
11/20/2018
HRT383

35. Conclusion Menu analysis is important
If demographic studies, internal capacities, cost cards, and markups have been executed correctly, the score should be a good one
Analysis should be done using either the Smith or the Hurst methods to ascertain the profitability of the menu
If the analysis shows a poor menu, make improvements
Good menu: first step has been taken toward running a profitable operation.
It’s just that simple
11/20/2018
HRT383

36. Where to Get More Information
Mill, Robert Christie (1998) Restaurant Management: Customers, operations, and employees / Menu Scoring & Menu Engineering, pp Upper Saddle River, N.J. : Prentice Hall.
Drysdale, John A. & Jennifer Adams Aldrich (2002). Profitable menu planning / Chapter 5: Menu Analysis, pp rd ed. Upper Saddle River, N.J. : Prentice Hall, TX911.3.M45 D  
CD-ROM TX911.3.M45 D  
Most Menu & F&B Management Books
11/20/2018
HRT383