1. Mid Day Meal Scheme MDM-PAB Meeting – TAMIL NADU On 16.02.2010
Ministry of HRD
Government of India
MDM-PAB Meeting – TAMIL NADU On

2. Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India
Part-I
Review of Implementation of MDMS in Tamil Nadu (Primary + Upper Primary) ( to )
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

3. Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India
Questions?
What is the level of coverage – Institution-wise, No. of children-wise, in terms of No. of meal served?
What is the level of unspent balances (Inventory) as on as well as ?
How regular the lifting of food grains? Is there any disruption/shortage in availability of food grains?
What is the level of lifting?
How about cooking cost? Was disbursed to Districts? What is the level of utilisation at school level?
How synchronous utilisation of food grains and cooking cost?
How utilisation of foodgrains reconcile with number of meal served?
…… contd
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

4. Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India
Contd ….., Questions?
How much MME was utilized? Under what activities?
What is the progress in construction of Kitchen Sheds and procurement of kitchen devices?
Part –II
What is the trend in Enrollment and No. of children availing MDM from 2008 to 2009?
How well MDM data compares with SSA data and Census data?
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

5. Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India
Benchmarks
Target Coverage: 100% (Institution-wise, No. of children-wise, in terms of No. of meal served)
Desirable stock in hand : 15% (+ or - 5%)
Availability of foodgrains [ to ]: 85% (+ or – 10%)
Utilisation of foodgrains and cooking cost [ to ]: 75% (+ or – 10%)
Every month 1/12th of foodgrains is lifted & distributed.
Utilisation of foodgrains & cooking cost is synchronous.
State’s AWP&B is in accordance with M/HRD’s guidelines.
Data in the AWP&B is authentic, reliable & based on the records.
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

6. Approval Vs Achievement (No. of Meals)
(Primary + Upper Primary)
(5% more)
No. of Meal (in Crore)
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

7. Non-Coverage : Number of Meals ( PY + U PY)
Sl. No.
Districts
Target as per MDM-PAB Approval for ( In Cr.)
Meals actually served during to ( In Cr.)
Short-served
No. of meals %
Low 1
Chennnai
1.88
1.62
0.26
-14% 2
Kancheepuram
3.28
2.97
0.31
-10%
Excess
Dharmapuri
1.76
3.14
-1.37
78%
Theni
1.68
1.94
-0.26
16% 3
Nagapattinam
2.59
2.86
-0.27
10% 4
Tuticorin
1.79
1.96
-0.17
Probable Reasons: -
Over / Under Budgeting, Non-coverage, Disruptions, Poor Quality of meals .

8. Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India
Approval Vs Achievement: (Avg. no of children during to )
( 2% More)
No. of children (In lakh)
(3% more)
(2% more)
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

9. Non-coverage : No. of Children availing MDM (Primary)
Sl. No.
Districts
Target as per MDM-PAB Approval for
Average No. of children availing MDM during to
Difference
No. of children %
LOW 1
Perambalur
34337
20809
-13528
-39% 2
Chennai
69697
54915
-14782
-21% 3
Kancheepuram
137095
112451
-24644
-18% 4
Karur
52775
44702
-8073
-15%
Excess
Dharmapuri
60724
90773
30049
49%
Vellore
197884
265995
68111
34%
Coimbatore
96090
119166
23076
24%
Tuticorin
73201
84256
11055
15%
Probable Reasons: -
Over / Under Budgeting, Non-coverage, Disruptions, Poor Quality of meals .

10. Non-coverage : No. of Children availing MDM (Up. Primary)
Sl. No.
Districts
Target as per MDM-PAB Approval for
Average No. of children availing MDM during to
Difference
No. of children %
LOW 1
Vellore
112632
48936
-63696
-57% 2
Coimbatore
96913
77038
-19875
-21%
EXCESS
Dharmapuri
54735
95994
41259
75%
Probable Reasons: -
Over / Under Budgeting, Non-coverage, Disruptions, Poor Quality of meals .

11. Approval Vs Achievement (No. of Working Days as on 31.12.09)
6% excess
No. of working days
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

12. Analysis: Foodgrains lifting (Month-wise cumulative)
Foodgrains (in MTs)
*: Including unspent balance as on
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

13. Analysis: Foodgrains lifting (Month-wise)
Foodgrains (in MTs)
*: Including unspent balance as on
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

14. Analysis: Foodgrains Availability (1.4.09 to 31.12.09)
Foodgrains (in MTs)
100%
56%
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

15. Foodgrains lifting (Availability) – Dist. wise
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

16. Foodgrains Utilisation (1.4.09 to 31.12.09)
Benchmark : 75%
1.26 Lakh MTs
0.71 Lakh MTs
0.68 Lakh MTs
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

17. Foodgrains Utilization– Dist. wise
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

18. Cooking Cost Disbursed and Utilisation (1.4.2009 to 31.12.2009)
Cooking Cost (in % Disbursed and utilisation.)
Benchmark :75%
Rs Cr.
Rs Cr.
Rs Cr.
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

19. Mismatch in Utilisation of foodgrains and cooking cost (District-wise)
State average: 54%(FG) & 75%(CC)
Benchmark: 75%
% Utilisation
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

20. Reconciliation : No. of meals Vs Qty of Food grains
Sl. No
District
No. of Meals served [In Cr.]
Expected consumption of Food grains (MTs)
Actual Consumption of Food grains (MTs)
Deficit in %
Defeat Consumption 1
Theni
1.94
-43% 2
Chennai
1.62
-42% 3
Krishnagiri
2.43
-39% 4
Dharmapuri
3.14
-35% 5
Namakkal
1.71
-34% 6
Nagapattinam
2.86
-33% 7
Perambalur
0.73
928.31
626.09 8
Virudhunagar
2.34
-32% 9
Villupuram
5.36 10
Sivaganga
1.61 11
The Nilgiris
0.82
985.41
685.26
-30% 12
Madurai
3.02 13
Trichy
2.82

21. Reconciliation : No. of meals Vs Qty of Cooking Cost
Sl. No
District
No. of Meals served [In Cr.]
Expected Utilization of cooking cost (Rs. In Lakh)
Actual Utilization of cooking cost (Rs in Lakh)
Deficit in %
Deficit Consumption 1
Dharmapuri
3.14
835.20
529.37
-37% 2
Theni
1.94
506.48
414.62
-18% 3
Namakkal
1.71
441.35
370.64
-16% 4
Pudukottai
2.90
753.32
651.35
-14%
Excess
Nagapattinam
2.86
748.40
+39%
Krishnagiri
2.43
630.08
762.17
+21%
Kancheepuram
2.97
775.13
907.76
+17%
Ramanathapuram
1.59
414.43
478.37
+15% 5
Perambalur
0.73
195.64
224.97 6
Chennai
1.62
430.40
483.77
+12%

22. Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India
MME Utilisation ( to )
Utilisation(Rs. In lakhs)
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

23. Transport Assistance Utilisation (1.4.09 to 31.12.09)
Rs Lakhs
Utilisation(Rs. In lakhs)
(100%)
(20%)
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

24. Achievement during 2009-10 (Kitchen Sheds)
Progress (in %)
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

25. Achievement during 2009-10 (Kitchen Devices)
Progress (in %)
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

26. Performance Score card – A Summary
Sl. No.
Component
Achievement
Benchmark 1.
Foodgrains Availability
56%
85% 2.
Foodgrains Utilisation
54%
75% 3.
Cooking Cost Utilisation 4.
MME Utilisation 7%
100% 5.
Kitchen Shed construction
91% 6.
Kitchen Devices procurement
72% 7
QPRs received
2nos.
3 nos.
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

27. Analysis of State’s Proposal for 2010-11
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

28. Time Series – No. of Children (PRIMARY)
(Down by 4%)
(Up by 3%)
No. of children (in lakhs)
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

29. Primary School Enrolment – SSA [Govt. + Govt.-aided + LB) Vs MDM
No. of children (in lakhs)
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

30. Population Vs Enrolment Vs Availing MDM (PRIMARY)
No. of children (in lakhs)
Q-1
Q-2
(Proposed)
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

31. Population Vs Enrolment Vs Availing MDM during 2009-10 (UPPER PRIMARY)
No. of children (in lakhs)
Q-1
Q-2
(Proposed)
*:SSA= Govt+LB+GA
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

32. No. of School Working Days (Pry & U Pry) DISE Vs MDM
Sl. No
Year
As per DISE Data
As per MDM Sanctions 1
217
220 2
Pry-214 U Pry-210 3
Not available
Pry-217 U Pry-207 4
Pry-220 U Pry-200
(State’s claim for )
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

33. Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India
Thank You
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India