Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

IEEE P Wireless RANs Date:

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "IEEE P Wireless RANs Date:"— Presentation transcript:

1 IEEE P802.22 Wireless RANs Date: 2007-05-16
March 2007 doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 May 2007 Advanced FEC Results IEEE P Wireless RANs Date: Authors: Notice: This document has been prepared to assist IEEE It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein. Release: The contributor grants a free, irrevocable license to the IEEE to incorporate material contained in this contribution, and any modifications thereof, in the creation of an IEEE Standards publication; to copyright in the IEEE’s name any IEEE Standards publication even though it may include portions of this contribution; and at the IEEE’s sole discretion to permit others to reproduce in whole or in part the resulting IEEE Standards publication. The contributor also acknowledges and accepts that this contribution may be made public by IEEE Patent Policy and Procedures: The contributor is familiar with the IEEE 802 Patent Policy and Procedures including the statement "IEEE standards may include the known use of patent(s), including patent applications, provided the IEEE receives assurance from the patent holder or applicant with respect to patents essential for compliance with both mandatory and optional portions of the standard." Early disclosure to the Working Group of patent information that might be relevant to the standard is essential to reduce the possibility for delays in the development process and increase the likelihood that the draft publication will be approved for publication. Please notify the Chair Carl R. Stevenson as early as possible, in written or electronic form, if patented technology (or technology under patent application) might be incorporated into a draft standard being developed within the IEEE Working Group. If you have questions, contact the IEEE Patent Committee Administrator at > John Benko, Orange Labs Patrick Pirat, France Telecom

2 Simulation environment for synching
March 2007 doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 May 2007 Simulation environment for synching Downlink FFT size : 2048 Guard sub-carriers: 184 on the left side, 183 on the right side DC sub-carrier: 1 Pilots: 240 Data sub-carriers: 1440 Sub-channel size: 24 data symbols Coded Block size: 576 Channel coding: Convolutional as in working document 0.1 Channel model: AWGN and Profile B Tail-biting encoding, Classical Viterbi Decoding Further details described in document John Benko, Orange Labs Patrick Pirat, France Telecom

3 Stage 1: Simulation results match! Convolutional Code, R=1/2 QPSK
March 2007 doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 May 2007 Stage 1: Simulation results match! Convolutional Code, R=1/2 QPSK John Benko, Orange Labs Patrick Pirat, France Telecom

4 Stage 2:Advanced Coding Simulations
March 2007 doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 May 2007 Stage 2:Advanced Coding Simulations Most simulations are of different block sizes! -Spent a lot of time agreeing how to simulate WRAN channel B Only agreed on sim/ block sizes last week: a) 384 coded bits, with QPSK R=1/2, Channel B, DS Frequency spreading the coded blocks in frequency (not time) b) 1728 coded bits, with 64-QAM R=3/4, Channel B, US Spreading the coded blocks in time (over 12 symbols) Only one company submitted these results! John Benko, Orange Labs Patrick Pirat, France Telecom

5 Simulation results from I2R (I)
March 2007 doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 May 2007 Simulation results from I2R (I) 16-QAM Rate =1/2 Coded Block Size: 288bits # of test positions: 6 # of iterations: John Benko, Orange Labs Patrick Pirat, France Telecom

6 Simulation results of I2R (II)
March 2007 doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 May 2007 Simulation results of I2R (II) 64-QAM Rate = 1/2 Coded Block Size: 288bits # of test positions: 6 # of iterations: John Benko, Orange Labs Patrick Pirat, France Telecom

7 CTC vs LDPC May 2007 AWGN, R=1/2, QPSK
March 2007 doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 May 2007 CTC vs LDPC AWGN, R=1/2, QPSK Duo-Binary TC, 8 iterations, Max-Log-MAP decoding IEEE e structured LDPC, BP decoding, 50 iterations N=576 and 2304 (coded blocksize) John Benko, Orange Labs Patrick Pirat, France Telecom

8 May 2007 March 2007 doc.: IEEE 802.22-yy/xxxxr0
John Benko, Orange Labs Patrick Pirat, France Telecom


Download ppt "IEEE P Wireless RANs Date:"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google