Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

IPPC application as seen by TOTAL Refining

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "IPPC application as seen by TOTAL Refining"— Presentation transcript:

1 IPPC application as seen by TOTAL Refining
12 years of practice, one recommendation Workshop European Commission IPPC – EUROPIA - 4/07/08 - X Bontemps TOTAL RM-RAF/HSEjuin 2008 Page 1

2 Total Refining in WE: 15 assets in 7 countries for the moment
TOTAL RM-RAF/HSEjuin 2008 Page 2

3 IPPC (international): 12 years later… There is no uniform practice.
France : Regulatory texts end Full refining emission footprints relating to main BATs reported from 2004 and completed mid BREFs and BATAELs handled by french authorities through a strict numerical reading. UK: Emission footprint reported mid 2005, completed by recent HDS project. IPPC permit delivered end No BATAEL used for ELV setting. Belgium : IPPC permit delivered mid This precedes the BREF documents. Ongoing negotiations since, in line with NECs and water emissions. Germany : IPPC permit also delivered in Prescriptions reviewed mid 2005, then in december 2007. Netherlands : BREF based comparison in 2004/5. IPPC permit delivered in June ELVs not modified as a function of BATAELs. Italy : Full environmental footprint reported 4Q No further request to date from the regulators. TOTAL RM-RAF/HSEjuin 2008 Page 3

4 IPPC (national): There is no uniform practice
IPPC (national): There is no uniform practice. The BREF concept and opportunity is not used. Ref A : the regulators use BATAELs to impose ELVs on SOx and water emissions: SOx : the bubble has been reduced to the theoretical sum of SOx BATAELs from each unit. Water : consumption prescribed at 0,62 m3/t and waste water specs aligned to most BATAELs despite the refinery’s complexity and the absence of genuine environmental impact! Ref B : Benzene waste water spec (5 µg/L) < river EQN (10 µg/L) and equal to the drinking water spec. Ref C : Water BATAELs used to negotiate and intermediate position vs. current best practice. TOTAL RM-RAF/HSEjuin 2008 Page 4

5 IPPC (local): The risk of damaging star industrial performance.
End 2004 : to satisfy FCC dust emission standards, Ref D commissioned an ESP early 2005 3Q 2008 : to comply with new SOx emission limits, the FCC will start a gas scrubber which makes economically redundant the prior investment. As a consequence : Regret expenditure Higher water emissions: sulfates, metals, N (to be challenged next) A borderline situation safetywise (project and operability) TOTAL RM-RAF/HSEjuin 2008 Page 5

6 IPPC : Safety first? TOTAL RM-RAF/HSEjuin 2008 Page 6

7 IPPC : financials IPPC1 equates to 10 €m/y/refinery over 2007-2011.
A burden followed by IPPC2 & ETS at a time when margins are predicted to drop and raw materials will remain on the rise. It remains a competitive threat and accelerator. Net cash margin Source: Solomon TOTAL RM-RAF/HSEjuin 2008 Page 7

8 IPPC : one recommendation
For decades, refiners have successfully applied the « plan - do – check – correct » cycle as a fundamental improvement model. IPPC represents a huge opportunity to improve our environmental abatement effectiveness in a cost effective manner. To fully harvest this opportunity, it requires more implementation time, one common international regulatory lense and a BREF concept that is understood and cross referenced by all stakeholders. To move on to IPPC2 with a sense of great urgency will be counterproductive. TOTAL RM-RAF/HSEjuin 2008 Page 8


Download ppt "IPPC application as seen by TOTAL Refining"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google