1. P2P: what do the participants think? Satisfaction with events
Percent of respondents agreeing with the statement*
Expert missions
Workshops
Study visits
Participants
(%/N)
Experts (%/N)
Participants (%/N)
Host institution (%/N)
Event achieved its goals
87% (97)
100% (31)
71% (15)
89% (33)
92% (14)
Knowledge has been improved -
53% (86)
Satisfaction with quality of experts training/presentations
90% (101)
80% (635)**
97% (36)
Satisfaction with logistical arrangements
87% (27)
78% (15)
82% (24)
Source: compiled from the DG NEAR Interim Report on the TAIEX-REGIO PEER 2 PEER (15 March 2016)
Notes: * partial agreements are not included in the calculation, total number of respondents in the parentheses, percentage calculated from the total number of answers provided
**Excellent and good

2. P2P: what do the participants think
P2P: what do the participants think? Expected follow up, results and impact
Percent of respondents agreeing with the statement*
Expert missions
Workshops
Study visits
Participants
(%/N)
Experts (%/N)
Participants (%/N)
Host institution (%/N)
Expectations about the use of results of exchange in practice
74% (83)
87% (27)
62% (100)
57% (12)
91% (34)
50% (7)
Further TAIEX assistance will be needed
77% (59)
83% (23)
85% (71)
80% (17)
90% (30)
57% (8)
Source: compiled from the DG NEAR Interim Report on the TAIEX-REGIO PEER 2 PEER (15 March 2016)
Notes:
* partial agreements are not included in the calculation, total number of respondents in the parentheses, percentage calculated from the total number of answers provided

3. P2P: Distribution of procedural outcomes for applications of the member states to P2P

4. P2P: monthly intensity of workload (applications and events)

5. P2P: who uses it most and who doesn’t?

6. P2P: who contributes most and who stays on the sidelines?

7. P2P: what do they talk about? (word cloud)

8. Is P2P expensive?
400 k EUR for P2P vs 790 mio EUR for TA (per annum, ERDF only) (1:1975)
Cost per event:
10.3 k EUR (workshop)
7.7 k EUR (expert mission)
3.2 k EUR (study visit) (all excl. VAT)

9. Is P2P really that fast? (Difference between target and actual dates of events, in days)
Data available for 24 events of 34
Minimum: -13 (i.e. event two weeks earlier than targeted)
Maximum: 86 (almost three months later than target)
Number of cases with zero or negative scores (i.e. events on or ahead of the target date): 5 (21%)
Number of cases with the difference of one calendar week or less: 9 (37%)
Median: 22 (interpretation: 50% of events took place in approximately less than three weeks past the target dates)
Average: 27