Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Stanford Center of Reservoir Forecasting 26th Annual Meeting

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Stanford Center of Reservoir Forecasting 26th Annual Meeting"— Presentation transcript:

1 Stanford Center of Reservoir Forecasting 26th Annual Meeting
Relating stratigraphic architecture to morphodynamic processes - Implications from a dynamic model of a channelized depositional system Yinan Wang and Tapan Mukerji

2 SCRF 26th Annual Meeting Talk Outline

3 SCRF 26th Annual Meeting Seismic imaging primary means for studying subsurface systems. Despite high quality, details of heterogeneity are not resolved. How to predict spatial features of sub-resolution depositional bodies?

4 SCRF 26th Annual Meeting As an alternative, Process-based models
Pros: a highly realistic representation of the subsurface Cons: computation power and time As an alternative, Cell-based/rule-based models:Zoltán Sylvester et al., 2010; Douglas Jerolmack and Chris Paola, 2007; Surface-based and objected-based models:Alejandro Leiva, 2009; Antoine Bertoncello, 2010;

5 SCRF 26th Annual Meeting Talk Outline

6 SCRF 26th Annual Meeting In a channel system,what processes control the spatial distribution of channel bodies? Model of channel clustering 1. Sensitivity of water flow to topography gradient 2. Avulsion – change of channel courses Two scales Model of avulsion Slingerland and Smith, 2004

7 SCRF 26th Annual Meeting Model Development
Model prototype proposed by Jerlmack and Paola, 2007 Cell Size: taken to be larger than channel width (100m) Model Domain: 39*39 cells Boundary Conditions: Reflecting boundaries on the left and right sides Plan-view channel system in the model

8 SCRF 26th Annual Meeting Model Development Model inputs:
sediment discharge (Qs) water discharge(Qw) subsidence rate avulsion threshold floodplain deposition rate initial system slope initial topographic roughness

9 SCRF 26th Annual Meeting Flow Path Selection
Sensitivity of water flow to topography Path searching on unvisited floodplain surface Yellow cells indicate cells occupied by active flow. Blue line indicates active flow. Elevation is in gray scale. Five cells are detected for lowest elevation.

10 SCRF 26th Annual Meeting Flow Path Selection Channel Reoccupation
Yellow cells indicate cells occupied by active flow. Orange cells indicate cells reoccupied by flow. Blue line indicates active flow. Dashed blue line indicates an old channel course. Elevation is in gray scale. Path searching on visited floodplain surface

11 Deposition and erosion along the flow path
SCRF 26th Annual Meeting Deposition and erosion along the flow path Diffusion Equation: k - diffusion coefficient; η - elevation 1 2 3

12 SCRF 26th Annual Meeting Avulsion h – channel depth
Superelevation in the model Superelevation Jerolmack, 2007 ηbottom – elevation of channel bed ηtop – elevation of levee crest vfp – floodplain deposition rate h – channel depth Superelevation of levee crests above attendant floodplain are 0.6 to 1.1 times channel flow depth for the Guadalope-Matarranya and Wasatch systems (Morhig et al., 2000). h – channel depth

13 = + SCRF 26th Annual Meeting Model Avulsion Topography-driven
path searching Model Avulsion Evolution of the entire floodplain Evolution of channel system Qs=0.01 m^3/s ; Qw=20 m^3/s ; System slope = ; Subsidence = 0.5 m/yr ; Avulsion threshold = 1 m ; Floodplain deposition rate = m/yr ; Topography Roughness = N(0,0.1)

14 SCRF 26th Annual Meeting Talk Outline

15 SCRF 26th Annual Meeting Sensitivity Analysis Monitored model inputs:
Monitored model outputs: sediment discharge water discharge avulsion threshold floodplain deposition rate initial topographic roughness initial system slope subsidence rate. compensation index channel sinuosity grading interval avulsion frequency, local avulsion frequency regional avulsion frequency

16 SCRF 26th Annual Meeting Sinuosity decays through time. The inflection point of sinuosity plot indicate the grading interval. Beyond this interval, slope system evolves into equilibrium state.

17 SCRF 26th Annual Meeting - Standard deviation of sedimentation to subsidence ratio

18 SCRF 26th Annual Meeting Compensation Index k clustering random
Power law exponent tells us about the randomness, evenness, or unevenness of basin filling. 0.5 = Random filling 1.0 = Perfect compensation 0.0 = Perfect “anti” compensation (clustering) 101 clustering k = 0 100 k = 0.5 random σss k = 1 10-1 σss = aT-k compensation 10-2 10-3 100 101 102 103 Measurement Window (distance or time)

19 SCRF 26th Annual Meeting Plackett-Burman Experimental Design
We investigated the control of parameters by 8 combinations

20 SCRF 26th Annual Meeting Spatial distribution of avulsion occurences
Conceptual illustration of avulsion location

21 SCRF 26th Annual Meeting Talk Outline

22 SCRF 26th Annual Meeting Summary Future Work
Cell-based models can be simplified an alternative to full physics to reduce computation. Sensitivity analysis of model parameters and responses. Slope and Qs Stratigraphic organization, Grading interval Qw Channel sinuosity Superelevation Regional avulsion frequency Future Work Use as a forward model in a stratigraphic inversion scheme. Feedback and advice welcome!


Download ppt "Stanford Center of Reservoir Forecasting 26th Annual Meeting"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google