1. Mid Day Meal Scheme MDM-PAB Meeting - MIZORAM on 27.04.2010
Ministry of HRD
Government of India
MDM-PAB Meeting - MIZORAM on 1 1

2. Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India
Part-I
Review of Implementation of MDMS in MIZORAM (Primary + Upper Primary) ( to )
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

3. No. of Schools Covered (PY + UP.PY)3 3

4. PAB Approval Vs State Performance (No. of Working Days in Q1+Q2+Q3)
100%
76%
77%
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

5. PAB Approval Vs State Performance (No. of children in Q1+Q2+Q3)
91% Covered
96%
96%
97%
117% Covered
Note:
(Primary): All Districts are showing exactly 96% coverage district wise.
(Upper Primary): All Districts are showing exactly 97% coverage district wise. 5
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

6. PAB Approval Vs State Performance (No. of Meals in Q1+Q2+Q3)
PRIMARY
No. of Meal (in Crore)
UPPER PRIMRY
100%
76%
73%
100%
76%
75%
Note:
(Primary): All Districts are showing 73% meals served.
(Upper Primary): All Districts are showing 75% meals served. 6

7. Food Grains Utilisation(1.4.09 to 31.12.09)
81%
76% Benchmark
Foodgrains (in MTs) 7

8. Food grains lifting Month-wise(Q1+Q2+Q3)[FCI BIILS]
Foodgrains (in MTs)
* Including Unspent balance 8
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

9. Cooking Cost Utilisation (1.4.09 to 31.12.09)
106%
76% Benchmark 9
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

10. Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India
Mismatch of no of meals served, Cooking Cost utilised & Foodgrains utilised (Q1+Q2+Q3)
Benchmark : 76% 10
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

11. Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India
MME Utilisation ( to )
47%
100% 11
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

12. Transport Assistance Utilisation (1.4.09 to 31.12.09)
66%
100% 12
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

13. Performance during 2006-10 (Kitchen Sheds)
100% utilisation of Physical
100% utilisation of Financial 13
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

14. Performance during 2006-10 (Kitchen Devices)
100% utilisation of Physical
100% utilisation of Financial 14
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

15. Performance Score card 2009-2010Sl
Component
Performance
Benchmark 1.
No of Schools covered under MDM
100% 2.
No of Children (PY+ UP.PY)
96% 3.
No of Working Days
77%
76% 5.
Foodgrains Utilisation
81% 6.
Cooking Cost Utilisation
106% 7.
Meals Served
74% 8.
MME Utilisation
47%
75% 9.
Transport Assistance
66%
10.
Kitchen Shed construction
11.
Kitchen Devices procurement
12.
QPRs
3 nos.

16. Analysis of State’s Proposal for 2010-1116
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

17. Time Series No of Children (PRIMARY)
DISE NOT AVAILABLE 17
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

18. No of Children (PRIMARY)
DISE NOT AVAILABLE
DISE 08-09
PAB Approval
09-10
STATE PROPOSAL
OPTED MDM
AVAILED MDM
Additional requirement – 4983 Children
DISE (08-09) – Govt + Govt.Aided 18

19. Time Series No of Children (UPPER PRIMARY)
DISE NOT AVAILABLE 19 19
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

20. No of Children (UPPER PRIMARY)
DISE NOT AVAILABLE
DISE (Govt +GA)
STATE PROPOSAL
MDM-PAB Approval
09-10
OPTED MDM
AVAILED MDM
Additional Requirement Children 20 20
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

21. No. of School days No Source of Data No of Days 1 DISE 2008-09 198 2
MDM approval (09-10)
205 3
Benchmark(Q1+Q2+Q3)
155 4
Performance(Q1+Q2+Q3)
157 5
State Proposal: Primary
Upper Primary
214
220 21

22. Proposal for Kitchen DevicesNo
Item
No. 1
Total No. of Institutions
2412 2
Total Sanctioned (06-10)
1294 4
Gap
1118 5
State Proposal ( ) 6.
Additional requirement 16 22 22

23. No. of Cook-cum-helpers
Item
No. 1
Total No. of Institutions
2412 2
Total requirement
5035 3
Already Sanctioned
2790 4
Balance requirement (2-3)
2245 5
Additional requirement
101 23 23

24. Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India
Thank You 24
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India