1. „Emission & Regeneration“ Unified Field Theory Osvaldo Domann
An approach where Subatomic Particles (SPs) are represented as focal points of rays
of Fundamental Particles (FPs) that extend from infinite to infinite.
The energy of SPs is distributed over the whole space about their FPs and interactions
between SPs are the product of the interactions of their FPs.
Fundamental
Particle

2. Motivation and
Methodology
Postulated

3. Particle representations
Point-like: Is the representation used by our classical physics
Wave packet: Is used in quantum mechanics
Focal Point: Is used in the theory of “Emission & Regeneration” UFT
Subatomic Particles represented as Focal Points of rays of Fundamental Particles (FPs)
Fundamental
Particles

4. Particles as focal points
Distribution in space of the relativistic energy of a BSP with v c
Fundamental
particle
Focal point FP
Opposed angular momenta

5. Particles as focal points
Linear momentum out of opposed angular momentum

6. Characteristics of the introduced fundamental particles (FPs)
Particles as focal points
Definition of field magnitudes dH based on Energy and angular momenta of FPs
Longitudinal emitted field
Longitudinal regenerating field
Transversal regenerating field
Characteristics of the introduced fundamental particles (FPs)
Fundamental Particles are postulated.
FPs move with light speed relative to the focal point.
FPs store energy as rotations in moving and transversal directions
FPs interact through their angular momenta or dH fields.
Pairs of FPs with opposed transversal angular momenta generate
linear momenta on subatomic particles.

7. Interactions between particles
Interaction laws between two SPs (electrons and positrons)
1) Interaction between two static SPs (Coulomb)
2) Interaction between two moving SPs (Ampere, Lorentz, Bragg, Gravitation)
3) Interaction between a moving and a static SP ( Induction, Maxwell, Gravitation)
These three interactions between SPs correspond to the three following interactions between the longitudinal and transversal dH fields of the
Interacting SPs. 1)
Longitudinal X longitudinal (Coulomb) 2)
Transversal X transversal (Ampere) 3)
Transversal * longitudinal (Induction)
The three following slides show each interaction in detail.

8. Interactions between particles
1) Interaction law between two static SPs (Coulomb)

9. Interactions between particles
2) Interaction law between two moving SPs (Ampere, Lorentz , Bragg and gravitation)

10. Interactions between particles
3) Interaction law between a moving and a static SP (Maxwell, Gravitation)
„Induction law“

11. Motivation and
Methodology
Postulated

12. 12 Coulomb at atomic distances
Linear momentum as a function of the distance between static BSPs
Coulomb
Nuclei core o o
Migrated electron
or positron o + o + o - - o
Electrons and positrons that migrate outsite the nucleus core are reintegrated or
expulsed. Reintegration generates the gravitation forces while expulsion radioactivity.

13. Newton and Ampere gravitation forces
Gravitation between two neutrons due to parallel and aligned
reintegration of migrated BSPs
Neutrons composed of electrons and positrons
Nuclei core
Nuclei core
Newton component
Ampere component
Gravitation is explained with the electromagnetic induction and Ampere laws. No difference between inertial and passive-gravitational mass exists.

14. Newton and Ampere gravitation forces
Total gravitation force due to the reintegration of BSPs
Ampere
component
Newton
component
For galactic distances the Newton component can be neglected and explains:
with a positive sign the flattening of galaxie‘s speed curve without the need of
dark matter
with a negative sign the expansion of galaxies without the need of dark energy.

15. 15 Particle representations
Point-like: Is the representation used by our classical physics
Wave packet: Is used in quantum mechanics
Focal Point: Is used in the theory of “Emission & Regeneration” UFT
The relation between QM and the representation of particles
QM is a theory based on potentials and is heavily based on classical physics.
Classical physics with its point-like representation requires four types of forces
(interactions) between particles (weak, strong, electromagnetic, gravitation) and
consequently QM needs four different gauge theories (QED, QCD, Electroweak,
Gauge/Gravity Duality) and is not a UFT .
“E & R” with its focal-point representation derives all four interactions from one
electromagnetic field , the field, and consequently QM needs only one gauge
theory, namely QED.

16. 16

17. Approches used in theoretical physics
Mythologocal: The easiest way to build a model to explain new experimental data. Fictitious particles or entities are defined with the characteristics required to explain new data. Gluons, Gravitons, dark energy and matter, etc. All religious models use this type of approach.
Mathematical: Equations are adapted so that calculated data match with experimental data violating physical reality and accepting contradictions. Special and General Relativity, MOND theory, etc.
Physical: Particle definition differs from the point-like representation of our Standard Model. Vortex, strings, wave package in quantum mechanics, focal points in “Emission & Regeneration UFT”.
All theoretical models are made consistent so that all direct or indirect obtained data don’t contradict the model. To make his model for relativity consistent, Einstein simply adapted reality postulating that emission theories are wrong and accepted the un-physical results of time dilation and length contraction.
The argument “Experimentally proven” doesn´t prove that the particle or concept really exist. It is only a confirmation that the model is consistent, what means that it is free of internal contradictions.

18. 18 Fallacy used to conclude that the existence of
fictitious entities is experimentally proven 18
Special Relativity as example 1.
Detection of experimental data that don‘t fit with the SM v
Light speed equal c in all relative moving frames 2.
Definition of fictious entities based on
the experimental data that don´t fit v
Time dilation and length contraction
Declaring that emission theories are wrong
because they are not compatible with SR 3.
Making the SM consistent with new
fictious entities as good as possible v 4.
Inventing justifications for remaining
contradictions v
Camouflaging contradictions as paradoxes
Closing all doors to theories that don’t accept the
fictitious entities (Peer review)
Declare fictious entities and contradic-
tions as the new Standard v 5.
Biggest impediment for
scientific progress v
Glorifying and idolizing the fictious
entities and ist creators 6.
Detecting additional experimental data that can be explained with the fictiotius entities v 7.
Increase of Life time of moving muons
Right
Wrong
Prove that fictious entities
really exist
More fictitious entities are: Gluons, gravitons,
dark matter, dark energy, Higgs particle, Axion, etc. v

19. Thank you for your attention,
The complete work is available at
Osvaldo Domann