Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Capabilities-Based T&R Presentation

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Capabilities-Based T&R Presentation"— Presentation transcript:

1 Capabilities-Based T&R Presentation
CNAP/CNAL Capabilities-Based T&R Presentation PXO Course 1 July 2018

2 General Policy Guidance T&R Matrix Format NCEA
Agenda This Capabilities-based T&R course will cover the following topics General Policy Guidance T&R Matrix Format NCEA Reporting (SHARP/DRRS-N)

3 Overview General Policy Guidance

4 The CB T&R is based on the Major Combatant Operations (MCO) standard
Introduction – Building Block Approach “ The mission of Naval Aviation training is to prepare tactically and technically skilled aircrew to win at war.” We do this by carefully using our many resources to achieve the highest level of training attainable: The CB T&R is based on the Major Combatant Operations (MCO) standard

5 Policy Overview - Current
Current Training and Readiness policy is delineated by CNAP/CNAL (CB T&R), dated 10 Dec 2015 This instruction includes the following references: Enclosures 1-15 contain the specific TMS matrices Appendix A - Matrix Format Appendix B - Ordnance Categories Appendix C - Reserved for Interim Matrices Appendix D - Equivalent Sortie Length Matrix Appendix E - Number of Authorized Aircrew Appendix F - FRTP Ordnance Expenditure Plan Appendix G - Glossary of Terms

6 Policy Overview - Future
The next update to the T&R Instruction (CNAP/CNALINST A) is awaiting signature from the CNAP/CNAL Chiefs of Staff Significant changes include; Skill sets replaced with flight tasks (aligns the METs directly to flight tasks) All flight tasks are now mandatory (no more optional tasks) Deleted the Sustainment/Production sections of every matrix Flight and simulator hours clearly mapped to flight tasks Clarified how detachment-based squadrons apportion flight hours to detachments when flying aircrew from different detachments New Format currently in use by; HM (new matrix + SHARP 7) VR (new matrix + SHARP 7) VP/VQ (in transition to the new matrix + SHARP 7) VAW (in transition to the new matrix only)

7 General Policy Guidelines - CVW/EXP FRTP Cycle
OFRP is based on a 36 month cycle even though the FRTP standards show 27 months TSTA AWF C2X ARP Depicted is a notional FRTP cycle. The actual FRTP cycle is determined by the operational schedule for the CVN, CVW, squadron, or detachment. Basic Integrated Sustain Deployment Maintenance ULT/ACTC

8 General Policy Guidelines - Key FRTP Dates
FRTP Start/End Date - Both Defines the unit FTRP cycle Affects ordnance expenditures and FRTP milestones (ARP, AWF, C2X, ISATT, CERTEX, Phase Transition) The dates can be adjusted for special circumstances Employability Start Date – Current matrix only For CVW squadrons, this is the completion of C2X or Fallon, whichever happens last For non-CVW units, this is the completion of C2X or as defined by your TYPEWING For all units, this date marks the crossover point between Production and Sustainment skills Phase Transition date – Current matrix only Normally used by non CVW based units (VP, Exp, etc.) Indicates the date the unit moves from Production to Sustainment skills Managed by CNAP/CNAL N40 via the Master Aviation Plan (MAP) and, in some cases, delegated to TYPEWINGs for management.

9 General Policy Guidelines - FDNF Units
FDNF Units include: CVW-5 HSM-51 Due to the dynamic schedule and OPLAN requirements, FDNF units are required to maintain higher levels of readiness Higher Flight Hour funding to maintain higher readiness All FDNF ordnance is considered End-to-End

10 General Policy Guidelines - Reserve Units
Reserve Units Include: TSW (VFC-12, VFC-111, VFC-13, VFA 204, VAQ-209) VR (C-40/C-130/C-20G) MSW (VP-62, VP-69, HSC-85, HSM-60) HM-14 and HM-15 reserve components use the Active Component HM matrix Reserve matrices … Use the same format and methodology as their Active Component counterparts Tend to have higher periodicities due to greater experience levels FHP funded by number of aircraft vice number of crews

11 General Policy Guidelines - Waivers
Waivers may be requested when resources are not available or when external factors (weather, operational tasking, range availability, etc.) preclude execution of tasks in the T&R matrix Carrier Air Wing Commanders shall initiate waiver requests for squadrons under their operational control Type Wing Commanders shall initiate waiver requests for squadrons not attached to a CVW and all detachments under their administrative control Waiver format example included in T&R instruction Waivers are submitted to the CNAP or CNAL N40 for approval. Expect CNAP or CNAL to deny ordnance waivers in order to “Show the Pain” Only Ef items can be waived in the T&R matrix.

12 T&R Matrix Format (Enclosures 1-15 )

13 T&R Matrices - Overview
Standardized format across all communities Max value on CAG/CO judgment Aligned to the FRTP Advanced Readiness Program (ARP) Air Wing Fallon Embarked Operations (ISATT/TSTA/C2X) Phase transition/CERTEX Incorporates training resources Flight Hour Execution ACTC syllabus Simulators Ordnance Aircrew Qualifications Critical Schools Matrix Enclosures (1) VFA/VFC (2) VAQ (3) VAW (4) VRC (5) VP (6) VPU (7) VQ(E) (8) VQ(T) (9) VR (C-20/C-40/C-130) (10) HSC (SH-60F/HH-60H) (11) HSC (EXP/NSW) (12) HSC (CVW/ M-197/UGR) (13) VTUAV (MQ-8B/C) (14) HSM (MH-60R) (15) HM (MH-53E)

14 Skill to flight task mapping + Skill periodicity
T&R Matrix Elements - Current NTAs Ef = SRS Pf = IARS Flight Tasks Flight Tasks Notes Skill to flight task mapping + Skill periodicity TFOM = Training Figure of Merit SRS = Squadron Requirements Section IARS – Individual Aircrew Requirements Sections Note: The 27.0 hours per Crew per month applies to the VFA matrix. The actual hours required to execute each matrix are included on the matrix. TFOM = Ef x Pf 80-100 60-79 0 -59 Simulators

15 NTA to flight task mapping + task periodicity
T&R Matrix Elements - New Flight Tasks NTAs Ef = SRS Pf = IARS Notes NTA to flight task mapping + task periodicity TFOM = Training Figure of Merit SRS = Squadron Requirements Section IARS – Individual Aircrew Requirements Sections Flight/sim hours Sub Tasks TFOM = Ef x Pf 80-100 60-79 0 -59 No longer has a Sustainment/Production section All Flight Tasks are required SRS section and TFOM calculations remain the same

16 Mission Essential Tasks (MET) – Both
NTA Navy unit level Mission Essential Tasks Most common type of MET used in a matrix Subset of the NMETL in DRRS-N NMETL COCOM/OPLAN driven Developed by the Type Wings TYCOM managed USFFC approved NMETL = Navy Mission Essential Task List) Mission Essential Tasks (METs) is technically the correct term for the list of tasks. NTAs are just one type of METs. VQ(T) matrix has other types (e.g., OP, SN, etc.).

17 Experience Factor (Ef) - Both
Measure of squadron level training requirements ACTC, ARP, C2X, Fallon Ordnance 90 day avg flight hours T/M/S specific quals/designations Ef is a number from 0.0 – 1.0 but displays as a whole number in DRRS-N Ef items are minimums Resourcing ensures minimums are met over the FRTP

18 Experience Factor (Ef) – Average 90 day FHP - Both
Flight Hour Execution is a measure of Readiness Target Value 90 day entitlement rolling average T&R (baseline) hours only Measurement Value 90 day actual rolling average All hours flown MESH not factored into training hours but does count towards total flight hours MESH = Mission Essential Support Hours (Also called Afloat/Ashore Support Hours)

19 Performance Factor (Pf) - Current
Skills Completed by executing flight tasks Periodicity driven by; Number of required iterations by crew seat (pilot, NFO, Aircrew etc) How often the skill needs to be repeated Flight Tasks Specific events required to achieve a skill The Wing Training Manual contains the prerequisites Individual Crews formed when all required crew positions have achieved all the required skills for a given NTA VAQ (CVW) Skills VQ (T) Skills

20 Partial List – for illustration only
Performance Factor (Pf) - Current Numbers = Number of required tasks “O” = Optional items Partial List – for illustration only

21 Performance Factor (Pf) - New
Flight Tasks No longer have production and sustainment sections All Flight Tasks are required all the time Flight Tasks now directly relate to NTAs Old optional tasks are now accomplished through Sub-Tasks mapped to a Parent Task The Wing Training Manual contains the prerequisites Individual Crews formed when all required crew positions have achieved all the required skills for a given NTA Sample HM Matrix

22 Wing Training Manuals (WTM)
Wing Training Manual provides community-specific details for each training task in the T&R Matrix including: Detailed description Prerequisites Training objectives aligned with T/M/S NMETLs  Requirements for completion Pass/fail criteria  The Measures of Performance (MOP) and MOE shall be used to evaluate each task. Debrief sheets will be included when applicable. 

23 Partial Matrix – for illustration only
Simulator Contribution – Current Simulator only Skills Simulator contribution to all skills Some matrix have required sim skills on top. Partial Matrix – for illustration only

24 Simulator Contribution – New
Some matrix have required sim skills on top.

25 Non-Combat Expenditure Allocation (NCEA) Appendix F

26 VFA T&R Ordnance Requirements
T/M/S Specific Notes: 1. Indicates the number of weapons per squadron that must be expended. (E2E) 2. Indicates the number of weapons/rounds per aircrew that must be expended. (TO) 3. Indicates the number of crews that must expend a weapon. (HTV) 17 Crews Onboard (COB)

27 Ordnance Categories CATMS HTV FLIGHTS & SIMULATORS
End-to End (E2E) $$$$$ Validates full kill chain Ordnance Loading Aircrew planning and tactics Weapon reliability 1-2 per squadron High Training Value (HTV) $$ Combat ordnance (live/inert) 1-7 per aircrew Training Ordnance (TO) & CATM $ Repetition E2E HTV Training Ordnance CATMS FLIGHTS & SIMULATORS Note: TO ordnance will not be a category in the new T&R matrix Readiness requires the complete combination of simulators, CATMs, Training Ordnance, HTV, & E2E in training.

28 High Training Value Ordnance
Ordnance Categories Training Ordnance (TO) 20MM (VFA) BDU-45 LGTR (VFA) Mk-76 Chaff/Flares Sonobuoys CSW Mk-58 High Training Value Ordnance (HTV) LGB (GBU-12/16/10) GP Live (Mk-80) HELLFIRE JDAM Torpedoes (HSM) ” rockets 20MM (HSC) End to End Ordnance (E2E) IR Missiles SLAM-ER Radar Missiles Harpoon HARM Maverick JSOW GBU-24B/B Note: The new T&R Instruction will only have HTV and E2E categories

29 COMPTUEX Air Wing Fallon ARP ULT
Appendix F – FRTP Ordnance Expenditure Plan Appendix F delineates NCEA allocation to each training event in the FRTP. Type Wing Weapon Schools, NSAWC, and CSFTL/P provide inputs for their FRTP events during the annual T&R Conference. ULT ordnance is allocated in 90-day blocks as determined by CNAL NCEA Readiness Officer. NOTE: TSTA is currently considered ULT. Changes to Appendix F requires coordination with the respective training organization and CNAL/CNAP. Changes to shipboard events shall be minimized due to logistical constraints. COMPTUEX CSG-15 / CSG-4 Air Wing Fallon NAWDC ARP Type Weapon Schools ULT E2E MISSILEX ULT 90-days ULT 90-days TSTA (ULT) ULT 90-days ULT 30 day Deploy NCEA Maintenance / ULT Basic Integrated Deploy Sustain FY18 FY19

30 Appendix F – FRTP Ordnance Expenditure Plan (VFA)

31 Appendix F – FRTP Ordnance Expenditure Plan (HSC)

32 CVW FY17 NCEA – Sample Roll-up
This is an example of the Air Wing NCEA worksheet used to plan and distribute NCEA. Ordnance requirements for each VFA squadron’s major FRTP events are displayed and totaled. A similar spreadsheet covers rotary-wing squadron requirements, which are much more robust with advent of APKWS and FFFWS The numbers are rolled up the airwing level and NCEA is issued to the respective CVW NCEA account for allocation directly to individual squadrons

33 FY18 NCEA Shortages Chronic shortages Acute shortages SLAM-ER
Harpoon (P-8) Hellfire Acute shortages Chaff / Flare Mk-25 Smokes 500-lb warheads 500-lb JDAM tail kits

34 Future Weapons AGM-88E Advanced Anti-Radiation Guided Missile (AARGM)
CATM-88E arriving on flight lines now AURs available GBU-53B Small Diameter Bomb (SDB II) Entered LRIP (144 bombs) 12 June, 2015 Planned NCEA AGM-158C Long Range Anti-Ship Missile (LRASM) First airworthiness test with a mass model 14 Dec 2015 No planned NCEA Joint Air-to-Ground Missile (JAGM) USN/USMC re-entered development with USA in March 2014

35 REPORTING (SHARP/DRRS-N)

36 Data Management – SHARP
Single data capture tool for squadron training Only data source to feed the DRRS-N Training Pillar for squadrons and detachments Reports module provides current training status and analysis for readiness reporting SHARP 7.0 implementation HM and VR complete Implementing VP and VQ in July Other units TBD awaiting a portable version SHARP 5.2 Current version Multiple single unit databases SHARP 7.0 New version Single Navy database Updated for modern browsers Improved list management

37 T Pillar Metrics Metric/Process Owner T-Pillar Metric CNO/USFFC TFOM =
OPNAVINST (DRRS-N) NRTP (DRRS-N Manual) TFOM = Pf x Ef Pf = performance factor Ef = Experience factor TYCOM CNAP/CNAL (DRRS-N Supp) CVN and T/M/S DRRS-N Guidance CNAP/CNAL (T&R Matrix) Determines T&R policy and format Contains T/M/S training matrices Pf = Number of Skilled Crews Number of Skilled Crews Required Ef = Number of SRS Items Completed Number of SRS Items Required FFC OPNAV define the TFOM equation. The TYCOM defines how P and E are calculated. The Type Wing determines how P and E are mapped. Type Wing Wing Training Manuals T&R matrix mapping for each TMS Development of the T&R matrix Caveat: If Ef < 100, then Pf is held at 80

38 SHARP Reports and DRRS-N
Two useful SHARP reports to assess readiness in DRRS-N Current Readiness Assessment (CRA) Crew METs with Individual Skills Report Provide a comprehensive picture of the Ef and Pf elements that make up TFOM in DRRS-N Provide basis for CO’s comments in DRRS-N

39 T&R Calculations to DRRS-N
TFOM = Pf x Ef Training NTAs are assigned a color in DRRS-N based on the TFOM calculated in ADW and NTIMS Unit updates Training (T-Pillar) in DRRS-N by submitting a Current Readiness Assessment (CRA) from SHARP CRAs submitted every 15 days or when readiness changes occur 80-100 60-79 0 -59

40 Keys to Success OPS needs to have a plan to execute training and ordnance expenditures Track R+ months throughout your FRTP cycle Quarterly flight hour funding = expected level of readiness Fly your hours to achieve expectations Reference SHARP reports to explain Pf degradations in DRRS-N SHARP Management is critical Logging matters! Especially in skills that cross multiple NTAs Training Officer, AOPS be proficient T&R should be a flight schedule driver

41 Points of Contact CAPT Christopher “Patty” Hurst T&R Officer
SHARP Program Manager LCDR Ford “Tight” Fitzkee NCEA Manager Contractor Support Leads CNAL Support Mr Chris Soler CNAP Support Mr. Tim Leonard Ms. Mary Erausquin Mr. Dan Scholtes Lead SHARP Support Rep Mr. Mark Burgunder SHARP Aviation Support Programs

42 Questions?


Download ppt "Capabilities-Based T&R Presentation"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google