Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Cognitive Processes PSY 334

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Cognitive Processes PSY 334"— Presentation transcript:

1 Cognitive Processes PSY 334
Chapter 6 – Human Memory: Encoding and Storage May 9, 2003

2 Factors Influencing Memory
Study alone does not improve memory – what matters is how studying is done. Shallow study results in little improvement. Semantic associates (tulip-flower) better remembered than rhymes (tower-flower), 81% vs 70%. Better retention occurs for more meaningful elaboration.

3 Elaborative Processing
Elaboration – embellishing an item with additional information. Anderson & Bower – subjects added details to simple sentences: 57% recall without elaboration 72% recall with made-up details added Self-generated elaborations are better than experimenter-generated ones.

4 Self-Generated Elaborations
Stein & Bransford – subjects were given 10 sentences. Four conditions: Just the sentences alone – 4.2 adjectives Subject generates an elaboration – 5.8 Experimenter-generated imprecise elaboration – 2.2 Experimenter-generated precise elaboration – 7.8 Precision of detail (constraint) matters, not who generates the elaboration.

5 Advance Organizers PQ4R method – use questions to guide reading.
64% correct, compared to 57% (controls) 76% of relevant questions correct, 52% of non-relevant. These study techniques work because they encourage elaboration. Question making and question answering both improve memory for text (reviewing is better than seeing the questions first).

6 Meaningful Elaboration
Elaboration need not be meaningful – other sorts of elaboration also work. Kolers compared memory for right-side-up sentences with upside-down. Extra processing needed to read upside down may enhance memory. Slamecka & Graf – compared generation of synonyms and rhymes. Both improved memory, but synonyms did more.

7 Incidental Learning It does not matter whether people intend to learn something or not. What matters is how material is processed. Orienting tasks: Count whether work has e or g. Rate the pleasantness of words. Half of subjects told they would be asked to remember words later, half not told. No advantage to knowing ahead of time.

8 Flashbulb Memories Self-reference effect -- people have better memory for events that are important to them and close friends. Flashbulb memories – recall of traumatic events long after the fact. Seem vivid but can be very inaccurate. Thatcher’s resignation: 60% memory for UK subjects, 20% non-UK

9 Neural Correlates of Encoding
Better memory occurs for items with stronger brain processing at the time of study: Words evoking higher ERP signals are better remembered later. Greater frontal activation with deeper processing of verbal information. Greater activation of hippocampus with better long-term memory.


Download ppt "Cognitive Processes PSY 334"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google