1. Peer-Review Mechanism
for the Improvement of Water Framework Directive Implementation
Findings at Data Management Workshop – October 2016 at WG DIS 18th October
Niklas Holmgren

2. RBDistricts candidates for a PR mission
16 Expressions of Interest from 11 MS

3. Geographic distribution of reviewing experts
70 candidate reviewing experts from 15 MS

4. Thematic workshops Ground water, 8-9th September, Kalmar Sweden
Data Management, 5-6th October, Nice France
Programme of Measures, 18-19th October Lourdes

5. Conclusions

6. Different structures information systems
Finland
Sweden …
Germany
France …
Governance not allways formalised – for example France have formalised thorugh SANDRE, in Sweden institutions cooperate through bilateral agreements.
Institutional reforms – reorganisation – makes problems for governance of datamanagement.
IS at institution scale – not shared.

7. Reporting Driving force for database improvements in many MS
Keep stabile
Vizualising tools for the outcomes – graphs and statistics as test and incitement available.

8. Reference data sets INSPIRE not enough
National Data Dictionaries are being built and National Reference data are increasing. Looking for mutualisation of efforts could help for better compatability
Proposal – make a lessons learned on the reporting in 2017 to make sure that problems encountered can be handled early in the coming cycle and be implemented on national level.
National categories of measures – harmonize KTM índicators and intercalibrate on EU level.

9. Open data needed for Understanding Decision Actions
Need to balance against growing insecurity, find and limit the sensitive areas.
User-friendly on the web, consider Wikipedia

10. WFD reporting is not for EC, it is for managing our common resource - water