Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byNatalie Walton Modified over 6 years ago
1
Affiliation Moor House School & University College London Lay summary
Name Lucy Nicoll Affiliation Moor House School & University College London Lay summary A comparison of two interventions for developing the ability of 14 to 16 year olds with SLI to identify, interpret, explain and use curriculum-linked idioms across multiple contexts. Question/Rationale Pupils require support to access English curriculum texts due to figurative language. Investigated effectiveness of two intervention approaches; 1:1 SLT & Teacher. What did you do? Students received 30 minutes of 1:1 SLT and 30 minutes of classroom support during English lessons each week. Pre- and post-therapy idiom explanation scores on the bespoke test were compared. SLT most effective (sig), then classroom (non-sig), then control. Curriculum-linked idioms were allocated randomly to one of 3 groups; SLT, Teacher and Control. What did you find out? Both intervention approaches are effective but more investigation is required to find the effectiveness of each approach when used in isolation & to find if these skills can be generalised. Next steps: Doctorate assessment & intervention project. Trial with younger students. Implications: Clinical: tools for monitoring and supporting idiom knowledge and skills (IKS) for SLTs and teachers either individually or collaboratively. Research: More evidence/information on IKS in SLI, SLT-CT collaboration.
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.