Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Seismic Developments at LASTI LIGO-G Z

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Seismic Developments at LASTI LIGO-G Z"— Presentation transcript:

1 Seismic Developments at LASTI LIGO-G050184-00-Z
Luarent Ruet Richard Mittleman  Lei Zuo March 2005

2  OUTLI NE 1) Geophone tilt correction HAM BSC (non-linear bending??) 2) BSC Stack Characterization Resonant Gain  Noise Study 3) Modal Control/Adaptive Filters 4) Estimators 5) HAM Plant Modifications 6) System identification noise subtraction Triple BSC Noise Measurements 7) Future Plans

3 Tilt Correction The source of tilt can be divided into two categories, inherent and induced.

4 Geophone Tilt Subtraction
Tilt transfer function of an inertial sensor Assumptions The plant is linear The induced angle is proportional to the displacement We can then predict the tilt-induced signal from the geophones

5

6

7 A B Control Strategy Fsts FPS FGeo FTilt FSup STS PS + Geo + Wit Plant
() STS Fsts K1 () Ground Output () ()=0 + FPS PS + Input A B + + Geo FGeo + + () () Wit + () Output Plant FTilt FSup K2 Feedback Control Strategy

8 BSC Transfer Functions

9 Beam Bending

10 Blow UP

11 vs. drive

12 BSC Stack Transfer Functions
From the Support table to the Optics Table

13 BSC Stack X-Mode

14 Resonant Gain Results

15 Adaptive Algorithm e d x FIR-Filter y Plant + - Gradient =
FIR filter, of length N, has coefficients h

16 Simulink Diagram

17 A B Control Strategy Fsts FPS FGeo FSup STS PS Geo Wit Plant
() STS Fsts K1 () Ground () ()=0 + FPS PS + Input A B + Geo FGeo + () () () Wit + Plant Adaptive Filter + + K2 FSup Control Strategy Feedback

18 HAM Optics Table Results

19 Modal control

20 Modal Control Results

21 Estimator Model - + Ground Noise (w) Sensor Noise (v) Plant Drive (u)
Gain K + Model Modal Signals

22 Estimator Math Where Ce is a selector Matrix
Where TFm is the model transfer function if A large K will give A small K will give

23 Noise Model

24 Estimator Results

25 Estimator Model - + Ground Noise (w) Sensor Noise (v) Plant Drive (u)
Gain Filter K + Model Modal Signals

26 F dependant K

27 Results

28 Spectrum

29 Future Estimator Work How Good does the Model Need to Be?
How do we optimize the Estimator Gain vs. the Control Gain? Try it on a piece of hardware; the triple pendulum control prototype. Other Ideas?

30 HAM Table Resonance

31 Stiffener

32 Y-Optical table

33 X–Position Sensors

34 Noise Subtraction

35 BSC Vertical Noise

36 Vertical Noise 2

37 Horizontal Noise #1

38 Horizontal Noise Low

39 Horizontal Noise Mid

40 Horizontal Noise High

41 Transfer Function from dSpace to Position Sensors
Transfer Function from dSpace to Support Table Geophones Open Loop transfer function Transfer Function from Ground STS to Witness Sensor Transfer Function from dSpace to Witness Sensor Control Equations Closed Loop Transfer Function from ground to witness sensor

42 THE END


Download ppt "Seismic Developments at LASTI LIGO-G Z"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google