1. Nasal place of articulation

2. Not-nasal place of articulation2

3. English Noses 3

4. English Nasals What is distribution of [n] and [m]? ‘seem’, ‘seen’
‘meat,’ ‘neat’ 4

5. English Nasals What is distribution of [n] and [m]? ‘seem’, ‘seen’
‘meat,’ ‘neat’
‘announce,’ ‘amounts’ 5

6. English Nasals What is distribution of [n] and [m]? ‘seem’, ‘seen’
‘meat,’ ‘neat’
‘announce,’ ‘amounts’
They appear in the same context
They form minimal pairs 6

7. English Nasals What is distribution of [n] and [m]? ‘seem’, ‘seen’
‘meat,’ ‘neat’
‘announce,’ ‘amounts’
They appear in the same context
They form minimal pairs
They belong to different phonemes 7

8. English Nasals What is distribution of [n] and [ŋ]? ‘neat’ ’*[ŋ]eat’
‘announce, ‘*a[ŋ]ounce’
Do any words begin with [ŋ]? 8

9. English Nasals What is distribution of [n] and [ŋ]? ‘neat’ ’*[ŋ]eat’
‘announce, ‘*a[ŋ]ounce’
Do any words begin with [ŋ]?
They never occur in same place so they are allophones of same phoneme
Are you sure? 9

10. English Nasals Minimal pairs with [ŋ] and [n] word internally?
wie[n]er, wi[ŋ]er 10

11. English Nasals
Minimal pairs with [ŋ] and [n] word finally? 11

12. English Nasals Minimal pairs with [ŋ] and [n] word finally?
feig[n], fa[ŋ]g 12

13. English Nasals
Minimal pairs with [ŋ] and [n] word initially? 13

14. English Nasals
Minimal pairs with [ŋ] and [n] word initially? No 14

15. English Nasals Minimal pairs with [ŋ] and [n] word initially? No
Why not? Historical reason
All cases of [ŋ] come from /ng/ > [ŋ] 15

16. English Nasals Historical /ng/ > [ŋ] fi[ng]er si[ng]
Nasal assim. fi[ŋg]er si[ŋg]
[g] deletion after [ŋ] fi[ŋg]er si[ŋ] 16

17. English Nasals Historical /ng/ > [ŋ] fi[ng]er si[ng]
Nasal assim. fi[ŋg]er si[ŋg]
[g] deletion after [ŋ] fi[ŋg]er si[ŋ]
English never had ng- at beginning of words 17

18. English Nasals Tend to be homorganic (same place of art.) bli[nd]
bli[mp]
ta[ŋk] 18

19. English Nasals Tend to be homorganic (same place of art.) bli[nd]
bli[mp]
ta[ŋk]
mu[ɲʧ]
Even across word boundaries 19

20. English Nasals Tend to be homorganic (same place of art.) bli[nd]
bli[mp]
ta[ŋk]
mu[ɲʧ]
Even across word boundaries
gree[ɲ ʃ]ores of Ireland 20

21. English Nasals Tend to be homorganic (same place of art.) bli[nd]
bli[mp]
ta[ŋk]
mu[ɲʧ]
Even across word boundaries
gree[ɲ ʃ]ores of Ireland
fa[m b]oy
i[ɱ f]ront of me 21

22. English Nasals Exception to homorganicity are -s and -ed suffixed
fla[md] *fla[nd]
lo[ŋd] *lo[nd] 22

23. English Nasals Exception to homorganicity are -s and -ed suffixed
fla[md] *fla[nd]
lo[ŋd] *lo[nd]
la[mz] *la[nz]
fli[ŋz] *fli[nz] 23

24. Spanish Nasals
Spanish has /ŋ, m, n/
Ñapa-tip
Mapa-map
Napa-leather 24

25. Spanish Nasals Is this a minimal pair (triplet)?
co[m] papas with potatoes
co[n] Lucas with Luke
co[ŋ] ganas with desires 25

26. Spanish Nasals Is this a minimal pair (triplet)?
co[m] papas with potatoes
co[n] Lucas with Luke
co[ŋ] ganas with desires
No, so [ŋ, m, n] are allophones of the same phoneme 26

27. Spanish Nasals Is this a minimal pair (triplet)?
co[m] papas with potatoes
co[n] Lucas with Luke
co[ŋ] ganas with desires
No, so [ŋ, m, n] are allophones of the same phoneme
But, Ñapa, Mapa, Napa says they belong to different phonemes? 27

28. Spanish Nasals Is this a minimal pair (triplet)?
co[m] papas with potatoes
co[n] Lucas with Luke
co[ŋ] ganas with desires
No, so [ŋ, m, n] are allophones of the same phoneme
But, Ñapa, Mapa, Napa says they belong to different phonemes? WTH? 28

29. Spanish Nasals
Phonetic overlap 29

30. Spanish Nasals Phonetic overlap
Neutralization: normally contrasting phones lose contrast in certain environment (before C in Spanish) 30

31. Engma in English [ŋ] comes from /nk, ng/ historically Fi[ng]er si[ng]
Nasal assim. fi[ŋg]er si[ŋg]
[g] deletion after [ŋ] fi[ŋg]er si[ŋ] 31

32. Engma in English
In Modern English [ŋ] is sometimes an assimilated /n/ and others not
/ng/ > [ŋg] then [g] deletes word-finally
lo[ŋ] lo[ŋg]er lo[ŋg]est
stro[ŋ] stro[ŋg]er stro[ŋg]est 32

33. Engma in English
In Modern English [ŋ] is sometimes an assimilated /n/ and others not
[ŋg] can’t come from /ng/
si[ŋ] si[ŋ]er si[ŋ]ing
prolo[ŋ] prolo[ŋ]ing
But, prolo[ŋg]ation 33

34. CV phonology
In CV phonology each phone has all its features associated to it
Another feature is [place of articulation] 34

35. CV phonology
In CV phonology each phone has all its features associated to it
Another feature is [place of articulation]
What does this formalism say in prose? 35

36. CV phonology
In CV phonology each phone has all its features associated to it
Another feature is [place of articulation]
What does this formalism say in prose?
A nasal consonant adopts the place of articulation of following consonant 36

37. Seri article
What is process? 37

38. Seri article
What is process?
What phonemes does article contain? 38

39. Seri article What is process? What phonemes does article contain?
/kom/ Why? 39

40. Seri article What is process? What phonemes does article contain?
/kom/ Why?
What is problem with this? 40

41. Seri article What is process? What phonemes does article contain?
/kom/ Why?
What is problem with this?
Assim. Only applies to article 41

42. Albanian Do a Y diagram of nasals
What are nasal phonemes and allophones? 42

43. Albanian Do a Y diagram of nasals
What are nasal phonemes and allophones?
Process?
CV rep.? 43

44. Albanian Do a Y diagram of nasals
What are nasal phonemes and allophones?
Process?
CV rep.? 44

45. Chumburung Dist. Of [m] vs. [n]? Dist. Of [n] vs. [ɲ]?45

46. Chumburung Dist. Of [m] vs. [n]? Dist. Of [n] vs. [ɲ]?
[ɲ, m, n] are contrastive
/m, n, ɲ/ 46

47. Chumburung
Dist. Of [n] vs. [ŋ]? 47

48. Chumburung Dist. Of [n] vs. [ŋ]? [ŋ] appears before [k]
[ŋ] appears word-finally 48

49. Chumburung Dist. Of [n] vs. [ŋ]? [ŋ] appears before [k]
[ŋ] appears word-finally
[n] intervocalic
[n] word-initial
[n] before [t, d] 49

50. Chumburung Dist. Of [n] vs. [ŋ]? [ŋ] appears before [k]
[ŋ] appears word-finally
[n] intervocalic
[n] word-initial
[n] before [t, d]
So . . .? 50

51. Chumburung
[n] and [ŋ] are allophones of same phoneme 51

52. Chumburung [n] and [ŋ] are allophones of same phoneme
Which phone appears in more cases?
[n] so we assume phoneme /n/ 52

53. Chumburung [n] and [ŋ] are allophones of same phoneme
Which phone appears in more cases?
[n] so we assume phoneme /n/
What is distribution?
/n/ is [ŋ] before [k] and word-finally
/n/ is [n] elsewhere 53

54. Chumburung
What is phonemic representation of
[ləŋ]
[konto]
[aŋko] 54

55. Chumburung What is phonemic representation of [ləŋ] /lən/
[konto] /konto/
[aŋko] /anko/ 55