Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Jon Baran – BWIG Dhaval Desai – Communications

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Jon Baran – BWIG Dhaval Desai – Communications"— Presentation transcript:

1 Device to monitor/control differentiation of stem cells to β-islet cells
Jon Baran – BWIG Dhaval Desai – Communications Kyle Herzog – Team leader Tim Pearce – BSAC Client: Victoria Browning, Ph.D. Advisor: Naomi Chesler, Ph.D.

2

3 Outline Background Problem statement Client requirements
(1) Human Islet Transplantation (HIT), (2) stem cells, (3) microfluidics Problem statement Client requirements Current gradient generation methods (1) Flow, (2) non-flow, (3) dropdown Our decision Future work References Questions

4 Human Islet Transplantation
Current method used to treat patients with type 1 diabetes [2]

5 Stem Cells [1]

6 Stem Cells Client has derived foregut-committed cell lines
Region from which pancreas develops Certain GFs induce differentiation into insulin producing cells Low purity, complete differentiation requirements largely unknown GF gradients play a large role in wild-type embryonic development

7 Microfluidics Behavior of fluids on the micro-level is very different than on the macro-level Laminar flow dominates Fluids will not mix readily via turbulence, and diffusion alone is responsible for mixing This property allows microchannels to establish concentration gradients [3,4]

8 Microfluidics Devices are relatively inexpensive and easy to make
PDMS used for channels can be imaged through and can withstand immunofluorescense Dr. Beebe is an expert in the field and is willing to guide us through the design process

9 Problem Statement Client would like to differentiate foregut committed progenitor cells into insulin-producing pancreatic β-islet cells These cells could replace or supplement transplanted donor beta cells Would like to test a large number of growth factors (GFs) for their ability to affect conversion of these progenitor cells into mature insulin-secreting cells Continuous linear growth factor gradient would be ideal

10 Client Requirements Capable of holding >=100 cells ( would be ideal) Compatible with imaging Capable of withstanding immunofluorescense Able to withstand 7-28 day incubation period at 37 degrees Celsius Minimal amount of GF required Total cost of under $500

11 Flow System Multiple fluid streams converge to form gradient
Allows rapid fluid exchange Laminar flow ensures only diffusion Syringe pumps induce flow

12 Flow System Pros Cons More widely researched
Gradient is set up very quickly Flow would make staining for imaging easy Cons No autocrine/paracrine signaling High reagent volume required Shear forces could have adverse effects Syringe pump required to maintain flow

13 Non-flow System Linear gradient forms via diffusion between source and sink Long term testing a possibility Used in migration studies System pioneered by student in Dr. Beebe’s lab

14 Non-flow System Pros Cons Autocrine/paracrine signaling uninhibited
Low volume of reagent required No syringe needed to maintain flow Cons Gradient takes time to develop Staining for imaging may be a problem Not as widely researched as flow systems

15 Dropdown System Fluid is flown across the top of the area which contains the cells The fluid flows across a variable permeable membrane The variation in the permeability causes a concentration gradient to form across the cells Two gradients will be formed One leftright and one topbottom

16 Dropdown System Pros Cons
Gradient could be easily established and maintained Two different gradients formed Could be patentable Cons May be difficult using different growth factors as they may be different sizes Construction of a variable permeable membrane may be difficult Large volume of GF required

17 Our Decision Non-flow system 5000 cells plated Channel dimensions
10 micron diameter Channel dimensions 2mm x 0.3mm x 0.3mm 0.01mm Matrigel coating Channel volume 0.157 nL Sink 0.01ng GF in 1microL (10ng/mL) Source concentration 0.15ng GF in 1microL (150ng/mL)

18 Future Work Final design constraints will be determined
Construction of prototype Verification of functionality Cell seeding efficiency Concentration gradients Cell viability Testing The system will be given to the client to test if the system identically meets their needs Due to the complexity of the project, multiple systems will be constructed with input from the client

19 References [1] Stephanie Watson. How Stem Cells Work.  11 Nov 2004  16 Oct 2007 [2] Islet cell transplantation. Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. 16 Sep 2007 < 16 Oct 2007 [3] Chung BG, Flanagan LA, Rhee SW, Schwartz PH, Lee AP, Monuki ES, Jeon NL Human nueral stem cell growth and differentiation in a gradient generating microfluidic device. Lab Chip. 5(4): [4] Whitesides GM The origins and the future of microfluidics. Nature. 442:

20 Questions?


Download ppt "Jon Baran – BWIG Dhaval Desai – Communications"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google