1. 101 innovations in scholarly communication
Motiverend en voor ons belangrijk, afgelopen 20 jaar en vooral laatste 5-10 jaar meer in onderzoek/publiceren veranderd dan 350 jaar daarvoor
Aspects of Open Science training
available at: /m9.figshare
Bianca Kramer & Jeroen Bosman, Utrecht University Library
FOSTER Open Science Bootcamp, April 18-20, 2018
@MsPhelps
@jeroenbosman
(except logos)

2. 101 innovations in scholarly communication: project overview & examples
Fields:
Scholarly communication
Tools for research
Research practices
Open Science
Workflows
Activities:
Exploration
Research
Supporting information
Advocacy
Workshops
CC-BY
Bianca Kramer & Jeroen Bosman
101innovations.wordpress.com
exploration
tools database
global survey
open science
research
workflows
research practices
advocacy
workshops

3. What will we do this morning ?
9:30-9:50
20 min
Goals of open science training
9:50-10:10
Your role as trainer (self-reflection)
10:10-10:30
Setting the scene for participants (creating a safe space)
10:30-11:00
30 min
Experience various training formats
11:00-11:30
Comparing experiences + final discussion

4. Goals of Open Science training

5. Open Science is … Open to participation Open to (re)use
Open to the world
No barriers based on race, gender, income, status, language
Involvement of societal partners in research priority setting
Evaluations that include societal relevance
Citizen science
Open Access, for people and machines, to:
Proposals and applications
Data
Code
Preprints, working papers
Papers and books
Reviews and comments
Posters and presentations
Open, non-proprietary standards
Open licences
Full documentation of process
Translations
Plain language explanations
Outreach beyond academia
Open to questions from outside academia
Curation and annotation of non-scholarly information
Participation in public debate
and: Open educational resources / Open source software / Open hardware / (no) patents
From: Bosman & Kramer (2017) Defining open science definitions

6. It’s up to you ... in groups of 3 ...
each pick an aspect of OS that interests you
write it down on the coloured sheet
think of a learning goal for training on your chosen aspect
... and for the aspects chosen by your group members
write them down on the coloured sheet, your own the last
compare & discuss the results in your group

7. Open Science is … Open to participation Open to (re)use
Open to the world
No barriers based on race, gender, income, status, language
Involvement of societal partners in research priority setting
Evaluations that include societal relevance
Citizen science
Open Access, for people and machines, to:
Proposals and applications
Data
Code
Preprints, working papers
Papers and books
Reviews and comments
Posters and presentations
Open, non-proprietary standards
Open licences
Full documentation of process
Translations
Plain language explanations
Outreach beyond academia
Open to questions from outside academia
Curation and annotation of non-scholarly information
Participation in public debate
and: Open educational resources / Open source software / Open hardware / (no) patents
From: Bosman & Kramer (2017) Defining open science definitions

8. Types of learning goals
knowledge
skills ?

9. Types of learning goals
knowledge
skills ? ? ? ?

10. Types of learning goals
knowledge
skills
awareness
discuss
prioritize
experience
change mindset
change behaviour

11. Your role as trainer (self-reflection)

12. It’s up to you ... In groups of 2 ...
Look at the scenarios on your handout
In each column, choose the one you’d be most and least comfortable with. Do this individually.
Compare & discuss the results with your neighbour
What makes certain scenarios easier or harder for each of you?

13. Setting the scene for participants

14. concentrated
increasing
complexity
serious
confrontational
facilitator-led
COMFORTABLE
CHALLENGING
cooperative
participant-led
SAFE
fun
repetitive
relaxed

15. PARTICIPANTS comfortable challenging safe safe
Background flower with labels for personality modification by Ykon and also used in a scholarly commons workshop. Central circle added by us.

16. It’s up to you ...
In groups of 3-4, think back to yesterday’s sessions
Can you describe one of the sessions using the terms on the handout?
What made it so?
Do you all have the same impression of the session?
If not, why would that be?

17. Experience various training formats

18. Each group does a different preset training activity
It’s up to you ...
4 groups of 8 people, people getting the Jack & Queen cards are facilitators in each group
Each group does a different preset training activity

19. What the groups don’t know is that they will get
a surprise intervention...
(that was intended to still feel safe)

20. Comparing experiences (final discussion)

21. Your group gets a set of 10 cards with open science practices
Show the cards one by one to your group and ask how many people in the group have done that particular activity.
Let these participants share their experiences with the rest of the group (what did they do, why did they decide to do it, did it work well for them?)
Stimulate the rest of the group to ask questions
Simpel, kan nog simpeler, blijft model; werkelijk onderzoek nooit sequentieel

22. (to simulate less people showing up than expected)
INTERVENTION
Right from the start, 4 of the 6 participants were removed from this group
(to simulate less people showing up than expected)
The 4 people removed were assigned a role of observer/rapporteur,
1 for each of the 4 groups
Simpel, kan nog simpeler, blijft model; werkelijk onderzoek nooit sequentieel

23. Your group gets a set of cards with open science practices.
The cards are color-coded for different research phases (see separate handout for overview of phases)
With the group, decide on the 1-2 ‘best’ practices per phase
For example, select the practices that are most realistic and/or would have a big effect
The selected practices together make an open science workflow !
Simpel, kan nog simpeler, blijft model; werkelijk onderzoek nooit sequentieel

24. Two participants in this group were asked (in secret)
INTERVENTION
Two participants in this group were asked (in secret)
to act as disruptive/difficult participants:
e.g. try to monopolize the discussion, question everything, etc.
Simpel, kan nog simpeler, blijft model; werkelijk onderzoek nooit sequentieel

25. A model of the research workflow
funding & project management
preparation
discovery
search information &
getting access
including being
assessed/evaluated
assessment
Simpel, kan nog simpeler, blijft model; werkelijk onderzoek nooit sequentieel
analysis
data collection,
experimenting & analyzing
incl. communication
with the general public
outreach
also including sharing
papers and data sets
publication
writing
including reference management & citing

26. The participants in your group will take a short online survey on which research tools/platforms they use in different research phases (see separate handout for overview of phases)
The survey can be accessed at:
When everyone is finished, view the results at
Discuss which tools/platforms are used the most, and to what extent people use open science tools/platforms
Simpel, kan nog simpeler, blijft model; werkelijk onderzoek nooit sequentieel
NB The survey links were only generated for this workshop – it is not an ongoing survey

27. Opening up the research workflow
Preparation:
Define & crowdsource research priorities
Organize project, team, collaborations
Get funding / contract
preparation
Assessment:
Comment / peer review
Determine impact of research output
Determine impact of researchers
Discovery:
Search literature / data / code / …
Get access
Get alerts / recommendations
Read / view
Annotate
assessment
discovery
Outreach:
Archive/share posters
Archive/share presentations
Tell about research outside academia
Researcher profiles/networks
Analysis:
Collect, mine, extract data / experiment
Share protocols / notebooks / workflows
Analyze
outreach
analysis
Simpel, kan nog simpeler, blijft model; werkelijk onderzoek nooit sequentieel
Publication:
Archive / share publications
Archive / share data & code
Select journal to submit to
Publish
Writing:
Write / code
Visualize
Cite
Translate
publication
writing

28. INTERVENTION
After 5-10 minutes, the group was told they no longer have internet / wifi
Simpel, kan nog simpeler, blijft model; werkelijk onderzoek nooit sequentieel

29. Use this unanswered question from the Ask Open Science Q&A website:
“What ethical caveats exist when doing Open Science?”
Have the group discuss this quite in depth and formulate an answer of words to this question
Simpel, kan nog simpeler, blijft model; werkelijk onderzoek nooit sequentieel

30. INTERVENTION
This group was constantly interrupted and their working environment was made noisy
Simpel, kan nog simpeler, blijft model; werkelijk onderzoek nooit sequentieel

31. Goals of Open Science training
Your role as trainer (self-reflection)
Setting the scene for participants
Experience various training formats